Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Pathfinder Pathfinder: Kingmaker - Enhanced Plus Edition - now with turn-based combat

Self-Ejected

Safav Hamon

Self-Ejected
Village Idiot The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
2,141
Deadfire's itemization is also on another level than Kingmaker.

aBRWDNs.png


sSjDlwe.jpg

0C81D6FFD0C9EB6E42E34F448E0E8CD66386C281
 

Cael

Arcane
Possibly Retarded
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Messages
22,063
You act as if pointing flaws in the game is somehow an assault on your manhood.
There are definitely valid criticisms of this game, a lot of them even.
:retarded:
Like most hypocrites, it is OK if you do it, but if someone else does it, pop goes the weasel. It is not as if it is that rare. The whole SJW and Black Lives Matter camp do it all the time.
Except you don't ever make specific, accurate criticisms of the game's actual issues, which would indicate you've actually played it. You just say "too buggy to play" (not true as of right after launch), "muh SJW" (a bit, but just as much trolling of SJWs), "stat bloat" (true in Ch6 but less of an issue than the banal encounter design) or just the fact that you hate Pathfinder rules (fair enough, I don't like PnP Pathfinder much either, but it works well in the game).
Saying that your vague and useless criticisms are vague and useless for discussing the game isn't hypocrisy it's just the truth.
There is none so blind as he who would not see. To say that I didn't have specific beefs with the flaws of game is an outright lie and shows that you are just trying to defame and troll people with deceit born of butthurt. Welcome to the Ignore list.
 

Incendax

Augur
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
892
I'm just bringing facts & logics to the conversation.

Deadfire is, in raw numbers, a deeper and more complex system than Pathfinder.
You posted eleven pictures about Deadfire. In a thread about Kingmaker. You have an entire thread devoted to Deadfire where you are free to post thousands of pictures.
 
Last edited:

jf8350143

Liturgist
Joined
Apr 14, 2018
Messages
1,358
You know, I'd like to discuss what Deadfire did better then Kingmaker and vice versa, it can be quite fun. But NOT in the Kingmaker thread.

Make a seperate thread, don't continue it here.
 

Lawntoilet

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
1,840
You act as if pointing flaws in the game is somehow an assault on your manhood.
There are definitely valid criticisms of this game, a lot of them even.
:retarded:
Like most hypocrites, it is OK if you do it, but if someone else does it, pop goes the weasel. It is not as if it is that rare. The whole SJW and Black Lives Matter camp do it all the time.
Except you don't ever make specific, accurate criticisms of the game's actual issues, which would indicate you've actually played it. You just say "too buggy to play" (not true as of right after launch), "muh SJW" (a bit, but just as much trolling of SJWs), "stat bloat" (true in Ch6 but less of an issue than the banal encounter design) or just the fact that you hate Pathfinder rules (fair enough, I don't like PnP Pathfinder much either, but it works well in the game).
Saying that your vague and useless criticisms are vague and useless for discussing the game isn't hypocrisy it's just the truth.
There is none so blind as he who would not see. To say that I didn't have specific beefs with the flaws of game is an outright lie and shows that you are just trying to defame and troll people with deceit born of butthurt. Welcome to the Ignore list.
You only post boring, predictable non-issues. The only butthurt is you thinking you're being trolled when people point out how fucking boring your posts are.
Luckily the holidays are when unloved faggots tend to kill themselves so hopefully 2019 will be free of your banalshitboring posts.
 

aweigh

Arcane
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
18,146
Location
Florida
if only 1 person buys a game and finishes it then it will 100% completion rate and thus be the best game ever according to Safav.

giphy.gif
 

Western

Arcane
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
5,934
Location
Australia
Codex 2012 Codex 2014 Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2
And how much of the customer base are veterans of the PnP game or infinity engine? 50%? 40%? 30%? It's definitely higher than 1%.

Yet only 1% beat the game, because that's the only percentage of people with low enough standards to play the game until completion.

But why aren't the vast majority of reviews negative then?

:philosoraptor:

Edit; Also I am the 1%
 

Cael

Arcane
Possibly Retarded
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Messages
22,063
It really doesn't matter how anyone else thinks. It is what YOU think. If you don't like the game, you won't buy it. If you like it, you buy it.

Just remember:
3097134746_71ea6b0842_b.jpg
 

Western

Arcane
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
5,934
Location
Australia
Codex 2012 Codex 2014 Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2
Also things I like and dislike about the game

+ Spell and item effects, spells with long duration negative effects, magic can be devastating (I think this makes real time combat more enjoyable for me)

+ Build variety, the differences between builds can feel quite pronounced, creating and experimenting with builds is very enjoyable.

+ Impact of kingdom management decisions

+/- Decent implementation of real-time combat, found it to be a lot less clusterfucky than POE, though I tend to prefer turn-based

+/- Writing is ok/meh, but I feel like there are enough story threads and good bits to carry the day as a backbone for all the other games positive elements.

- Number of load screens in kingdom management (a bit less bad now as stats can be trained while adventuring)

- Uneven difficulty spikes, high difficulty trash mobs in the end game which punish suboptimal builds/party composition.

- Bugs, thankfully the worst bugs seem to be over, but still plenty of non-game breaking bugs, which can be irritating to see things like Octavias mum standing around from the start of the game, etc.

Overall I give it a recommend. I have personally enjoyed it more than either of the POE games (I finished POE 1, but grew bored with POE2 towards the end game, sailed around picking fights then never bothered with the final battle).
 
Last edited:
Self-Ejected

Safav Hamon

Self-Ejected
Village Idiot The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
2,141
purpleblob Except they aren't. Deadfire has better scores from critics and users. It has already won GOTY awards from the worlds largest PC gaming magazine and worlds longest running PC gaming magazine. 20 times as many people finish it over Kingmaker.

Kingmaker's popularity on the codex is largely contrarianism, due to spending three years fostering a vitriolic anti-Obsidian circlejerk. Yet as soon as turn-based mode for Deadfire was announced, this thread died until I started posting about its pathetic completion rate.
 
Last edited:

Efe

Erudite
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Messages
2,605
its not new. happened to me at least. it would be nice if you have a save just before those events and they see it.
 

PrettyDeadman

Guest
purpleblob Except they aren't. Deadfire has better scores from critics and users. It has already won GOTY awards from the worlds largest PC gaming magazine and worlds longest running PC gaming magazine. 20 times as many people finish it over Kingmaker.

Kingmaker's popularity on the codex is largely contrarianism, due to spending three years fostering a vitriolic anti-Obsidian circlejerk. Yet as soon as turn-based mode for Deadfire was announced, this thread died until I started posting about its pathetic completion rate.
POE is a surprising mix. It has some quality but with it comes corporate watering down. It seems like a game which wants to be nice and likeable to everyone instead of trying to be something great or even particulary good.
It also has a lot of incompetence (systems balance, writing), but incompetence without pretense for something great or fun. I can appreciate failure if someone tried to do something interesting, but they seem to be stumbling all the time without trying to do something particulary worthwhile.

Kingmaker is just on another level compared to POE.
Bugs or some overpowered builds of Kingmaker are nothing compared to fundamentally boring game systems or inconsistent and unfocused narrative of POE.
 

Sharpedge

Prophet
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Messages
1,061
Yeah, I'm still not buying the 'muh hardcore RPG' narrative as to why 90% of players are quitting before the halfway point.

If it was actually a good game, then more than 1% of players would beat it regardless of the difficulty (and it's not remotely challenging).

It is more challenging than pillars, which for my 1st playthrough I did potb blind solo with level upscaling on a pale elf votary. That game was completely devoid of any difficult combat encounters.
 

ArchAngel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
21,331
purpleblob Except they aren't. Deadfire has better scores from critics and users. It has already won GOTY awards from the worlds largest PC gaming magazine and worlds longest running PC gaming magazine. 20 times as many people finish it over Kingmaker.

Kingmaker's popularity on the codex is largely contrarianism, due to spending three years fostering a vitriolic anti-Obsidian circlejerk. Yet as soon as turn-based mode for Deadfire was announced, this thread died until I started posting about its pathetic completion rate.
This topic died off because:
#1 people move on to new games after a while and this game has been out for 3 months.
#2 Atom has been released and by all accounts it is a good game so people moved there.

Still nobody cares for your retard game.
 

Volrath

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
4,299
purpleblob Except they aren't. Deadfire has better scores from critics and users. It has already won GOTY awards from the worlds largest PC gaming magazine and worlds longest running PC gaming magazine. 20 times as many people finish it over Kingmaker.

Kingmaker's popularity on the codex is largely contrarianism, due to spending three years fostering a vitriolic anti-Obsidian circlejerk. Yet as soon as turn-based mode for Deadfire was announced, this thread died until I started posting about its pathetic completion rate.
This topic died off because:
#1 people move on to new games after a while and this game has been out for 3 months.
#2 Atom has been released and by all accounts it is a good game so people moved there.

Still nobody cares for your retard game.
#3 the fucking Jew had one of his fits and split up a legendary thread.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom