Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Red Dead Redemption 2 - now available on PC

Makabb

Arcane
Shitposter Bethestard
Joined
Sep 19, 2014
Messages
11,753
^ autism
 

Oracsbox

Guest
The shooting mechanics in rockstar games have always been a bit shit I can let it slide as long as everything else works.

Anyway in real life gunfights/murders usually involved being shot in the back John Wesley Hardin was a master at it.
 

Ezekiel

Arcane
Joined
May 3, 2017
Messages
6,709
Meaning, you should be able to shoot from the hip instantly, like in a true western.
You really should watch the videos before typing shit.


Shown with the shotgun, shooting from the hip

Can you shoot just by holding R1/R2? I doubt it. It will double as a punch button or some shit. The fact that the camera is zoomed makes that obvious. Looks like you may have two levels of zoom when pressing the trigger.
The shooting mechanics in rockstar games have always been a bit shit I can let it slide as long as everything else works.

Anyway in real life gunfights/murders usually involved being shot in the back John Wesley Hardin was a master at it.
I would argue Max Payne 3 had good shooting mechanics. Moreso in the multiplayer, where you have faster movement, a melee button and grenades. All their other games have bad shooting.
 

sullynathan

Arcane
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
6,473
Location
Not Europe
The shooting mechanics in rockstar games have always been a bit shit I can let it slide as long as everything else works.
Max Payne 3 was excellent with some animation & design problems. RDR2 is following the Max Payne 3 weapon loadout system from what we see

Can you shoot just by holding R1/R2? I doubt it. It will double as a punch button or some shit. The fact that the camera is zoomed makes that obvious. Looks like you may have two levels of zoom when pressing the trigger.
or you have a reticle showing when your gun is pulled out which allows you to shoot and then pressing L2/LT zooms in more like in previous R* games.
 
Last edited:

Kem0sabe

Arcane
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
13,219
Location
Azores Islands
So hyped for this and unfortunately stuck with 2 broken ass rpgs that I can't play until they are patched well into next year, pathfinder and insomnia.
 

Oracsbox

Guest
I remember reading that there were a lot of black cowboys in the late 1800's where the game takes place.
Yes there was but the issue with the video I posted above was the author of the IGN article reviewed and I'm sure more to come in a similar vein is the constant use of identity politics and finding any excuse to ruin enjoyement anyone might have with it seems anything.
The IGN guy just dislikes white people and is happy to use any platform to vent said hatred.
 

SpoilVictor

Educated
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
84
Location
My room, sometimes other rooms
I lost faith in Rockstar after GTA IV and give up after GTA V so I'm not really following news on RDR2.

Did they spilled the beans how much content and activities they want to offload to Online part of the game? And for what we are supposed do grind money (better yet buy it from R*): golden guns? tuned horses? flying stagecoaches?

Just asking.
 

orcinator

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
1,776
Location
Republic of Kongou
And for what we are supposed do grind money (better yet buy it from R*): golden guns? tuned horses? flying stagecoaches?

Don't think so. I too want to know what will be the equivalent of the Orbital Cannon(only 10$ per shot) but I don't think we'll know for a long time since R✡ knows too well that the less info you reveal the less likely someone might think something looks bad.
 
Self-Ejected

unfairlight

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
4,092
Multiplayer shit isn't "content" considering most of it can't be accessed in the single player, not to mention how GTA IV had 2 pretty lengthy DLCs while GTA V had none.
 

sullynathan

Arcane
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
6,473
Location
Not Europe
Multiplayer shit isn't "content" considering most of it can't be accessed in the single player, not to mention how GTA IV had 2 pretty lengthy DLCs while GTA V had none.
No one gives a shit about DLC, people always bring up GTA 4 DLC because the base game is so banal shit boring and devoid of content compared to San Andreas. it was never the norm for GTA, it's the only GTA that had single player DLC.
 

Modron

Arcane
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
11,154
No one gives a shit about DLC, peopel always bring up GTA 4 DLC because the base game is so banal shit boring and devoid of content compared to San Andreas. it was never the norm for GTA, it's the only GTA that had single player DLC.
GTA V is so shit boring and devoid of content compared to 4.
 

Modron

Arcane
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
11,154
There are huge swaths of GTA V that are absolutely devoid of content beyond a few random collection items, they killed off all kinds of side activity and content. Sure it's got what 2-3 memorable heists versus 4's one memorable heist but the rest of the game is lifeless. The focus on multiplayer on GTA V had a negative impact and all but the most diehard fans can see it.

All in all Rockstar is just like Bethesda where each further iteration of a series is a whittling down of what came before it and I was highly disappointed by GTA V such that anytime Rockstar starts hyping multiplayer content now it turns me into Metro in the sense I am not buying that game until 75% off the goty version.
 
Last edited:

sullynathan

Arcane
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
6,473
Location
Not Europe
There are huge swaths of GTA V that are absolutely devoid of content beyond a few random collection items, they killed off all kinds of side activity and content. Sure it's got what 2-3 memorable heists versus 4's one memorable heist but the rest of the game is lifeless. The focus on multiplayer on GTA V had a negative impact and all but the most diehard fans can see it.
GTA V is about 3 times the size of 4, just like San Andreas was about twice the size of 4. Of course the larger game has large swaths of land that has nothing going on it, just like GTA 4 did but GTA4 is far smaller.

What Side Activity did they kill off and content? By pure numbers GTA V has more content than GTA 4, a point you have failed to counter. Instead, you would rather point out the only decent main mission in GTA 4 something that is not a side content or optional activity. Go replay three leaf clover ad infinitum if it is that fun to you, but I would rather not replay 1 out of the 90 shitty missions in GTA 4 and use that as a reason for GTA V being devoid of content, nor do i want to hang out with my retarded cousin as side content.

All in all Rockstar is just like Bethesda where each further iteration of a series is a whittling down of what came before it and I was highly disappointed by GTA V such that anytime Rockstar starts hyping multiplayer content now it turns me into Metro in the sense I am not buying that game until 75% off the goty version.
I don't give a shit about their multiplayer content, I don't play them. I do want to see why you have barely any real complaints about GTA V outside of "muh multiplayer" yet have no complaints about the whittling down that happened between San Andreas to GTA 4 and the fact that GTA V returned to the scale and large amount of content of San Andreas.
 
Last edited:

Volrath

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
4,299
GTAV was utter shit if you look back at it. A huge downgrade compared to IV which on itself was already a huge step back from San Andreas.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom