Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

"Role-Playing" Games that are an Example of the Illusion of Free Choice

Saldrone

Educated
Joined
Feb 18, 2024
Messages
181
RPGs that, despite being about decisions they all lead to the same path giving an artificial sense of choice. Whetever the game itself or some particular quest.
 

lvl 2 Blue Slime

Educated
Joined
Apr 19, 2023
Messages
245
Location
Australia
But is the definition of an RPG really CYOA-style story choices? So games like Fallout where the first RPGs? I would put forward that what defines an RPG is progression, getting XP and levelling up.
 

Glop_dweller

Prophet
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
1,224
One can make an RPG with no leveling up, and no getting XP. It is simply what the character would do in situ; Papillon —the RPG— might not be that exciting, but every day the character would have the choice to eat, to pace (or not) in his cell, shadow box the chain, and talk to those in the other cells. Essentially TES:Oblivion were the king never to visit the prison, and the PC never to escape. Would Oblivion suddenly not be an RPG if the player character never left the cell?

*Of course it's also possible to have the escape, and have the PC be limited to their equipment use (no leveling), and to manipulate the world without quest XP; only monetary and social rewards. Gameplay could still be about the character's exploration, and about their personal [skill & stat] limitations... they just wouldn't become a demi-god in two weeks.
 
Last edited:

Glop_dweller

Prophet
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
1,224
One can make an RPG with no leveling up, and no getting XP.
Yes but not without stat progression.
Why not?

Imagine a Witcher game where Geralt graduates as a competent adventurer... Does he really need to improve past graduation?

Fallout doesn't have stat progression.

*I am not stating that these mechanics don't make for a better game, they do, but I do not believe that they define a game as an RPG.
 

Harthwain

Magister
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
5,400
But is the definition of an RPG really CYOA-style story choices?
This is the limitation of cRPGs that are based on scripted narratives. That said, it is possible to create cRPGs that are more gameplay/system-oriented/sandboxes, but such RPGs are uncommon and it would require a separate debate on what C&C is (what qualifies as Choices and Consequences).
 

NecroLord

Dumbfuck!
Dumbfuck
Joined
Sep 6, 2022
Messages
14,742
It should be a matter of making those choices meaningful and having consequences in the game.
 

Peachcurl

Arcane
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
10,653
Location
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
RPGs that, despite being about decisions they all lead to the same path giving an artificial sense of choice. Whetever the game itself or some particular quest.
That's nearly every RPG that has choices in the first place.

What is a 'meaningful' consequence anyways?
Clearly, having ending slides in 3 different colors ala Mass Effect 3 is not.
But are ending-slides by themselves, even if more complex, meaningful for the game? They don't change the game itself, only the conclusion.
If we follow that line of thinking, meaningful consequences have to impact the game itself. But where to draw the line? Does simply having combat suffice, as it implies (fatal) consequences of your actions? Or is that too immediate?
 

ind33d

Learned
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
1,800
The illusion of choice is irrelevant. You're not supposed to replay an RPG because that trivializes the decisions you made to begin with. I'm sure everyone thought you could stay with UNATCO in DX1, but the absence of that plotline does not matter as long as you are not aware it was cut, which you would learn on a subsequent replay.
 

Axioms

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
1,630
I mean if a game has a main storyline that terminates in an ending, how could there be choice and consequence? Linear Narrative RPGs can only let you engage with what the writers wrote. If they didn't write something then it can't happen.

Would a game with real choices and consequences even be a CRPG? CK2 had more choice and consequence than any RPG ever did. Of course it wasn't a walking simulator and many people only accept walking simulators as RPGs.
 

Saldrone

Educated
Joined
Feb 18, 2024
Messages
181
RPGs that, despite being about decisions they all lead to the same path giving an artificial sense of choice. Whetever the game itself or some particular quest.
That's nearly every RPG that has choices in the first place.

What is a 'meaningful' consequence anyways?
Clearly, having ending slides in 3 different colors ala Mass Effect 3 is not.
But are ending-slides by themselves, even if more complex, meaningful for the game? They don't change the game itself, only the conclusion.
If we follow that line of thinking, meaningful consequences have to impact the game itself. But where to draw the line? Does simply having combat suffice, as it implies (fatal) consequences of your actions? Or is that too immediate?
Oh well, looks like i'am overstimating the narrative aproach of RPGs since in Fallout New Vegas the way how you influence the world around not only determinates the ending but also the final confrontation (The Second Battle of Hoover) depending the factions you convince to help you or just absent due to being eradicated.
I mean if a game has a main storyline that terminates in an ending, how could there be choice and consequence? Linear Narrative RPGs can only let you engage with what the writers wrote. If they didn't write something then it can't happen.

Would a game with real choices and consequences even be a CRPG? CK2 had more choice and consequence than any RPG ever did. Of course it wasn't a walking simulator and many people only accept walking simulators as RPGs.

Similarly i had the same idea about Stellaris; It has many similarities to a role-playing game. (Such as the character (empire) creation, character (empire) building, emergent storytelling, decision making and dialogue (diplomacy) system to npcs (AI empires)) Yet is considered to be just a 4X Strategy Game.
 
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
2,860
Location
The Present
C&C is overrated. Player agency in how they prosecute the game/plot is far more important. Trying to make C&C influence plot is a fools errand. C&C should be like the Fallout 1 miltary base where you can draw away mutants with the radio, or poisoning the stag lord's wine in Kingmaker. The player achieves the same plot goal, but how they get there has player agency. This is proper C&C that is achievable as it doesn't demand different plots paths our outcomes.
 

Axioms

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Jul 11, 2019
Messages
1,630
C&C is overrated. Player agency in how they prosecute the game/plot is far more important. Trying to make C&C influence plot is a fools errand. C&C should be like the Fallout 1 miltary base where you can draw away mutants with the radio, or poisoning the stag lord's wine in Kingmaker. The player achieves the same plot goal, but how they get there has player agency. This is proper C&C that is achievable as it doesn't demand different plots paths our outcomes.
So Baldur's Gate 3 style. Makes sense in a narrative RPG context.
 

ind33d

Learned
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
1,800
The C&C is supposed to be dying. Most RPGs are just too easy, so that never occurs
 

Readher

Savant
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
696
Location
Poland
But is the definition of an RPG really CYOA-style story choices? So games like Fallout where the first RPGs? I would put forward that what defines an RPG is progression, getting XP and levelling up.
eytrxh-jpg.png
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom