Volourn said:
Oh please. Another one pulling that 'You ahve changed . Youw ere so kewl, and now you suck" types. *yawn* My posting style hasn't changed. You just don't like the fact that it's directed at you now because you are being silly.
Drop the mouth stuffing. What I don't like is the fact that someone I could pretty much have decent conversations with suddenly pulls all kinds of stupid crap during conversation. If what you suggest was true - that I'm reacting in some or other way because you're telling me something - than I would've reacted like this earlier, because it's no the first time we disagree in less than friendly terms. Yet, I didn't. But it's too hard to understand this, I guess, and the blame has to be mine.
I read you silly posts, and sugar coat it all you want; your basic point from what I read was that you need dialogue skills for it to be a realz RPG; if not it's just pretend RPG or some silly pseudo RPG. It's either a RPG, or it's not. Gothic 2, even without dialogue skillz, is a RPG.
Your argument (and I use the term loosely here) is starting to get pathetic and with enough holes to drive an SUV through it. I made two statements where I've implied I found a lack of dialogue skills to limit roleplaying, not that it would be the ultimate factor in determining wheter it was an RPG or not. As Whip pointed out, the Ultimas didn't had a speech skill, and I considered them RPGs - on the other hand, the creation and use of such a skill could have improved the roleplaying in the game.
Nowhere did I state a lack of it would not make it an RPG, merely that it resembled more of an adventure game in mechanics (which isn't that hard to realize, given the mechanic is widely used in both, but its the CRPG that
tends to use dialogue in other ways, and in conjunction with other mechanics). Yet, you keep making the same baseless assumption and going for the radical viewpoint where you have to try and prove yourself as the one with the winning argument.
At this point I don't care wheter you're going to dig yourself even deeper, or if you are finally going to realize what I've said. My point is clear, it's only upon you to understand it or fib some more to try and save face.
Learn to read. Again.
Bullshit. The fact you think that shows how little you know.
Yeah, maybe I should consider you stupid instead. Hey, y'know what? That's just the kind of material you'd need to make
yet another moronic assumption that I have a particular line of thought because I post around here.
What you menat to say, however
Don't presume to know what I want to say or not.
if Volourn posts exactly like I want him to, or his diatribes are targeted at others, it's all cool; but if it's directed at me, :" Waaaaaaaaa!".
Go fuck yourself.
You, more than anyone, should know what you posted there is plain and utter bullshit, Volourn, and as proof I can perfectly dig up situations where we disagreed, as I've said before, in less than friendly ways, where you directed your 'diatribes', as you put it, against me or something I said, and yet I didn't reacted in any out of the ordinary way. I had no reason to do so then, and I certainly don't have a reason to do so now - and I certainly wouldn't do it over simple disagreements.
Play the victim all you want, and lie all you want, but don't do it at my expense. Ever. Again.
