Wilian
Arcane
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,846
Dude, 1070 is 7 year old card. It's time to get over it.AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti as minimum specs, for something that mostly looks like a xbox 360 game.
Dude, 1070 is 7 year old card. It's time to get over it.AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti as minimum specs, for something that mostly looks like a xbox 360 game.
You do realise that if it's running at 30 FPS on consoles then it's probably just optimized like shit, and will therefore run like a turd on PC too, right?I will get the game on pc. So the fps problem dosn't really bother me. I am quite impressed with what i saw.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 4.7 GHz 6-Core ProcessorYou do realise that if it's running at 30 FPS on consoles then it's probably just optimized like shit, and will therefore run like a turd on PC too, right?I will get the game on pc. So the fps problem dosn't really bother me. I am quite impressed with what i saw.
You sell new expensive GPUs by making super good looking games everyone wants to play or by releasing super hyped terribly optimized games everyone wants to play. 2nd type costs less to make. And then you get a bit of action from those overpriced GPUsThis was always going to be 30 frames.
Most pc fags are in for a shock as well when they see the requirements.
5700 is 2019 only , brand new...Dude, 1070 is 7 year old card. It's time to get over it.AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti as minimum specs, for something that mostly looks like a xbox 360 game.
So with a bit of luck , unchecking some options you may be running starfield on 1080p at 60fps.AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 4.7 GHz 6-Core ProcessorYou do realise that if it's running at 30 FPS on consoles then it's probably just optimized like shit, and will therefore run like a turd on PC too, right?I will get the game on pc. So the fps problem dosn't really bother me. I am quite impressed with what i saw.
DeepcoolLT720 85.85 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler
Gigabyte B650 GAMING X AX ATX AM5 Motherboard
Corsair Vengeance 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5-5200 CL40 Memory
Kingston NV2 1 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive
Kingston NV2 2 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive
MSI VENTUS 3X OC GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB Video Card
Fractal Design Torrent ATX Mid Tower Case
Corsair RM1000x (2021) 1000 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply
I am not concerned. Also Consoles are generally low in term of hardware.
Oh come on now lol. I hope that was a joke.So with a bit of luck , unchecking some options you may be running starfield on 1080p at 60fps.AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 4.7 GHz 6-Core ProcessorYou do realise that if it's running at 30 FPS on consoles then it's probably just optimized like shit, and will therefore run like a turd on PC too, right?I will get the game on pc. So the fps problem dosn't really bother me. I am quite impressed with what i saw.
DeepcoolLT720 85.85 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler
Gigabyte B650 GAMING X AX ATX AM5 Motherboard
Corsair Vengeance 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5-5200 CL40 Memory
Kingston NV2 1 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive
Kingston NV2 2 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive
MSI VENTUS 3X OC GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB Video Card
Fractal Design Torrent ATX Mid Tower Case
Corsair RM1000x (2021) 1000 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply
I am not concerned. Also Consoles are generally low in term of hardware.
Bad optimization on console dosn't usually affect PC. Consoles have by default outdated hardware.If its dogshit optimization and 30 fps on consoles , then it might not be a joke.
Whatever you think about your average game dev in a programming position, it's likely much worse.That's the caliber of developers we're dealing with now, huh.
And you people wonder why I call devs scum.
https://www.ph3.at/en/about.htmlOn two separate occasions where the originally contracted team had essentially stated it was impossible to increase the performance any further, Peter was able to optimize the titles significantly with barely any support or additional tools. I was impressed by his professionalism and responsiveness.
Well the xbox is like 12 terraflops , completely shitty compare to a late nivdia card which is 81 terraflops . Shitty shitty console indeed, but do you remember how games were looking on a simple PS2 which was a simple 1gigaflop, not terra, of power. Does games looks 12000X better now ? I dont think so.Bad optimization on console dosn't usually affect PC. Consoles have by default outdated hardware.If its dogshit optimization and 30 fps on consoles , then it might not be a joke.
Sorry but yes... Starfield looks way better than skyrim. And not only in post processing but also in cluttering specular maps overall models and textures. Does look top notch graphics? Not of course not. But they are also different games to start with. Starfield has a lot of features as it stands that skyrim dosn't like procedurally generated terrain. And a lot of other things.Well the xbox is like 12 terraflops , completely shitty compare to a late nivdia card which is 81 terraflops . Shitty shitty console indeed, but do you remember how games were looking on a simple PS2 which was a simple 1gigaflop, not terra, of power. Does games looks 12000X better now ? I dont think so.Bad optimization on console dosn't usually affect PC. Consoles have by default outdated hardware.If its dogshit optimization and 30 fps on consoles , then it might not be a joke.
Ok the PS2 is old , lets look at skyrim working really well on a xbox 360, only 240 gigaflops . Does Starfield looks 50X better than skyrim ? Dont think so either, i genuinely doesnt soemthing jaw dropping there.
Optimization > hardware , devs got lazy and that hardware consume too much power, raise the bill and heat my room, its already 27°c right now fuuuck...
*Yells at cloud*
Doesn't really matter if both have TAA/DLSS and that means all shading+geometry is undersampled garbage ( =shit in shit out). The better the display the more obviously, and that means displays suck too.Well the xbox is like 12 terraflops , completely shitty compare to a late nivdia card which is 81 terraflops . (...)Bad optimization on console dosn't usually affect PC. Consoles have by default outdated hardware.If its dogshit optimization and 30 fps on consoles , then it might not be a joke.
Toad HowardOne of leaked concept art showing easter egg small critter:
More or less my feelings about it.Gonna be honest. On the one hand this seems like the most interesting game from Bethesda Game Studios since Morrowind. Settings looks interesting, I like the art design and exploring the universe with your own spaceship and crew will be probably intriguing. And since this is a new IP, I'm okey with their character system. But it's still a game from BGS, so story, story telling, characters and C&C will probably suck.
Oh my bad. I had no memory AMD was SO behind the curve still at the time.5700 is 2019 only , brand new...Dude, 1070 is 7 year old card. It's time to get over it.AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti as minimum specs, for something that mostly looks like a xbox 360 game.
I thought this was me for a second.Gonna be honest. On the one hand this seems like the most interesting game from Bethesda Game Studios since Morrowind. Settings looks interesting, I like the art design and exploring the universe with your own spaceship and crew will be probably intriguing. And since this is a new IP, I'm okey with their character system. But it's still a game from BGS, so story, story telling, characters and C&C will probably suck.
Optimization takes a lot of resources (time and money), which might not always return a positive ROI.Well the xbox is like 12 terraflops , completely shitty compare to a late nivdia card which is 81 terraflops . Shitty shitty console indeed, but do you remember how games were looking on a simple PS2 which was a simple 1gigaflop, not terra, of power. Does games looks 12000X better now ? I dont think so.Bad optimization on console dosn't usually affect PC. Consoles have by default outdated hardware.If its dogshit optimization and 30 fps on consoles , then it might not be a joke.
Ok the PS2 is old , lets look at skyrim working really well on a xbox 360, only 240 gigaflops . Does Starfield looks 50X better than skyrim ? Dont think so either, i genuinely doesnt see something jaw dropping there.
Optimization > hardware , devs got lazy and that hardware consume too much power, raise the bill and heat my room, its already 27°c right now fuuuck...
*Yells at cloud*
The 1000 series is the best series nvidia ever put out, they thought AMD was going to blow them out of the water that generation and they poured everything into it. The 4000 series equivilents make marginal improvements at best, especially for the price. Once you realize RTX is a meme for lazy developers to skimp on doing good lighting and that it's useless without DLSS (which unless you game from your couch is a washed out mess) it becomes obvious that you get far more out of a 1000 series card.Dude, 1070 is 7 year old card. It's time to get over it.AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti as minimum specs, for something that mostly looks like a xbox 360 game.
Unless I'm mistaken, they haven't specifically shown the fast travel system in action. It's very likely that you'll have the option to fast travel directly inside your ship.If you go over the trailer with a fine tooth comb there’s a lot of questionable shit in it. Like the fact that your ship’s interior isn’t loaded with the planet, you have to switch cells and go through a loading screen everytime you want to go back into your ship.
So you have a loading screen when you fast travel back to your ship, and ANOTHER loading screen to go INSIDE your ship.
Remember when SSDs practically removed loading screens or reduced them to a few seconds? I'm so glad we have such fast technology, that way they could make them a hardware requirement and make use of the insane speed to give us loading screens again and take us right back to where we started.If you go over the trailer with a fine tooth comb there’s a lot of questionable shit in it. Like the fact that your ship’s interior isn’t loaded with the planet, you have to switch cells and go through a loading screen everytime you want to go back into your ship.
So you have a loading screen when you fast travel back to your ship, and ANOTHER loading screen to go INSIDE your ship.
They actually did. The moment your ship take flight there is a tiny scene playing. It is most likely then when you get teleported you will get teleported outside in front of your ship. And when you interact with the door inside the hangar will load up and you will find yourself inside the ship. Wich is something i don't mind. Seems like to be sort of an hub based system they said terrain is often procedurally generated and mixed with handcrafted point of interest.Unless I'm mistaken, they haven't specifically shown the fast travel system in action. It's very likely that you'll have the option to fast travel directly inside your ship.If you go over the trailer with a fine tooth comb there’s a lot of questionable shit in it. Like the fact that your ship’s interior isn’t loaded with the planet, you have to switch cells and go through a loading screen everytime you want to go back into your ship.
So you have a loading screen when you fast travel back to your ship, and ANOTHER loading screen to go INSIDE your ship.