Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Decline The lack of sincerity in RPGs (and gaming in general)

Iucounu

Scholar
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
1,220
So, what, if anything at all, is the way out of this dynamic? Just do our best to support the good amongst the bad?
Because as we know the trash keeps selling like hot cakes.
People with bad taste need to be shamed and ridiculed, to prevent them from having a negative influence on others.
 

retardgrand

Novice
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
9
The pop culture references in Fallout 2 were stupid, yes, but despite its silliness the game still takes its premise more seriously than your average modern game. It's not just about content, but about tone, and the tone of writing has shifted heavily towards insincerity.

The tone of gaming 20 years ago, even when it was dumb and self-referential, was more along the lines of "Look at this awesome shit! We're having fun in an awesome fantasy world, fuck yeah!"
Today, the tone is more like "Look at this silly and stupid world with all its silly tropes! But don't worry, we're totally aware of these tropes and don't take it too seriously. Being serious about fantasy is for nerds, right? Ha, anyway, here's some modern social issues that REALLY matter, unlike all this made up fantasy stuff!"
Fallout 2 was absolutely horrid about this and it should not be just handwaved. President of the Enclave is fucking named "Dick Richardson", with his vice president being an over the top Dan Quayle caricature. When your main villains are a complete joke, what's left. No matter of apologist can change the fact that Fallout 2 is massive decline compared to the first game.
 

Red Rogue

Augur
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
175
Location
The Squat Rack
So, what, if anything at all, is the way out of this dynamic? Just do our best to support the good amongst the bad?
Because as we know the trash keeps selling like hot cakes.
People with bad taste need to be shamed and ridiculed, to prevent them from having a negative influence on others.
The problem is shaming is most effective when the majority opinion is exerting that pressure. We can shame Joe T. Asswipe from the Codex but no one will give a shit.
 

Iucounu

Scholar
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
1,220
So, what, if anything at all, is the way out of this dynamic? Just do our best to support the good amongst the bad?
Because as we know the trash keeps selling like hot cakes.
People with bad taste need to be shamed and ridiculed, to prevent them from having a negative influence on others.
The problem is shaming is most effective when the majority opinion is exerting that pressure. We can shame Joe T. Asswipe from the Codex but no one will give a shit.
I wasn't entirely serious. But in many cases a respected individual may exert enough pressure to create doubt in the target's mind. So if a friend plays a despicable game, don't let him think it's the normal thing to do, and force him to acknowledge that it's indeed despicable.
 

Beastro

Arcane
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
10,238
Location
where east is west
The pop culture references in Fallout 2 were stupid, yes, but despite its silliness the game still takes its premise more seriously than your average modern game. It's not just about content, but about tone, and the tone of writing has shifted heavily towards insincerity.

The tone of gaming 20 years ago, even when it was dumb and self-referential, was more along the lines of "Look at this awesome shit! We're having fun in an awesome fantasy world, fuck yeah!"
Today, the tone is more like "Look at this silly and stupid world with all its silly tropes! But don't worry, we're totally aware of these tropes and don't take it too seriously. Being serious about fantasy is for nerds, right? Ha, anyway, here's some modern social issues that REALLY matter, unlike all this made up fantasy stuff!"
Fallout 2 was absolutely horrid about this and it should not be just handwaved. President of the Enclave is fucking named "Dick Richardson", with his vice president being an over the top Dan Quayle caricature. When your main villains are a complete joke, what's left. No matter of apologist can change the fact that Fallout 2 is massive decline compared to the first game.
That was bad, but what was worse was the inability to side with the Enclave, so you're shoehorned into destroying them.

I could find the jokes at the end more acceptable if FO2 had preserved FO1s more open freedom of choice for the ending.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom