Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

The Valve and Steam Platform Discussion Thread

Caim

Arcane
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
17,470
Location
Dutchland
Valve is the saviour and the cancer of PC Gaming at the same time.
No, Valve is like a bomb waiting to go off one day. You all better hope Gabe doesn't die of a heart attack or something and Valve gets bought by EA/Activision/etc.
Not sure how this works legal-wise in the Kwa, but isn't Gaben one of few owners of Valve, and upon his or those of his partners' death(s) does their part get divided equally amongst the survivors?
 

DragoFireheart

all caps, rainbow colors, SOMETHING.
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
23,731
Not sure how this works legal-wise in the Kwa, but isn't Gaben one of few owners of Valve, and upon his or those of his partners' death(s) does their part get divided equally amongst the survivors?

It would likely go to his wife depending on how his will is written.
 

Zewp

Arcane
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
3,604
Codex 2013
No, Valve is like a bomb waiting to go off one day. You all better hope Gabe doesn't die of a heart attack or something and Valve gets bought by EA/Activision/etc.

With practically every giant publisher having financial trouble and the way Valve has been expanding likely, I doubt anyone would be able to afford buying Valve in its entirety a few years down the line. Activision maybe, depending on whether WoW and CoD remains cash-cows.
 

DragoFireheart

all caps, rainbow colors, SOMETHING.
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
23,731
With practically every giant publisher having financial trouble and the way Valve has been expanding likely, I doubt anyone would be able to afford buying Valve in its entirety a few years down the line. Activision maybe, depending on whether WoW and CoD remains cash-cows.

That's why I said they are a time bomb and not a issue now.
 

Metro

Arcane
Beg Auditor
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
27,792
Fargo is right. Obviously not through the games they develop but the Steam platform has given a huge lift to designers who otherwise wouldn't be able to put their game out. The only negative on Steam is the whole 'game ownership' debate which, in the grand scheme of things, is trivial compared to 99% of people's daily living expenses. There is no problem with Early Access -- it's entirely optional. I've bought a couple of Early Access titles but have now decided it usually takes too long to reach released state that there's no point in playing an alpha/beta. Again, completely the consumer's choice. If you don't think you should pay for access to a game in alpha... don't.

As far as Valve ownership, I believe Gabe is either the sole or the majority partner by a significant majority. He has a wife. He has a child. I'd say the chances are high that it stays in the family. Maybe twenty or so years from now something bad will happen but at that point the Steam detractors will look like idiots: bunch of fifty year olds grousing about whether they can still access some thirty year old games.
 

Metro

Arcane
Beg Auditor
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
27,792
Or maybe the unthinkable will happen and Drago will spawn children so they can grouse about game ownership issues while he passes a kidney stone.
 

tuluse

Arcane
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
11,400
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong
Or maybe the unthinkable will happen and Drago will spawn children so they can grouse about game ownership issues while he passes a kidney stone.
His philosophy is that it's better to get reamed in the ass now by Microsoft and Xbox than to potentially get reamed later on by Valve.
 

Unkillable Cat

LEST WE FORGET
Patron
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
28,591
Codex 2014 Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy
Wasteland 2's Brian Fargo: Valve "the saviour of the PC"

And yet Brian Fargo doesn't get it HOW Valve became the savior of the PC.

By relieving developers of the pressure of having to charge $60 for their products.
 

Destroid

Arcane
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
16,628
Location
Australia
Valve is the saviour and the cancer of PC Gaming at the same time.

No, Valve is like a bomb waiting to go off one day. You all better hope Gabe doesn't die of a heart attack or something and Valve gets bought by EA/Activision/etc.



Indeed, I've been saying this for a while, when Gabe dies it is going to be a disaster of unprecedented scale for PC gaming.
 

Delbaeth

Learned
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
320
Maybe twenty or so years from now something bad will happen but at that point the Steam detractors will look like idiots: bunch of fifty year olds grousing about whether they can still access some thirty year old games.

Yeah.
Fargo does look like an idiot for sure: he was trying to revive a 25 YEARS OLD IP.
And the whole Codex is full of idiots praising games like Fallout: OMG, IT'S MORE THAN 15 YEARS OLD!

Just stick to recent popamole crap.


His philosophy is that it's better to get reamed in the ass now by Microsoft and Xbox than to potentially get reamed later on by Valve.

Ooooooh Yeah. There's nothing else for sure.

Binary minds don't deserve choice and freedom.
 

Kane

I have many names
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
22,478
Location
Drug addicted, mentally ill gays HQ
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
Valve has said Early Access is "the way games should be made.

:retarded:

Well, it's beta testing by people who are so interested in the task they are willing to pay for it. As long as the devs ignore the stupid suggestions and don't run away with the money, everyone is happy.

And that's exactly the problem I have with it. The developers have absolutely no obligation to not do just that. I mean, I assume that around 90% of all studios are owned and operated by morally sound individuals that are in business for making games first and money second. But that still leaves 10% that potentially just want to screw you over. Only paying for existing and finished products effectively zeros that possibility.
 

Zewp

Arcane
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
3,604
Codex 2013
My problem is that Steam doesn't seem to have any way of checking whether Early Access developers are actually competent enough to get around to ever finishing their games. What Early Access has essentially done is empower a whole generation of hobby developers to put their games on Steam without doing anything about the fact that hobby developers very often don't finish products because they get bored halfway through or they get 'burned out' like the Towns dev.

You can just check out the Desura Alpha Fund section the see where Steam Early Access is heading in the next few years. Desura's Alpha Fund is filled to the brim with games that have been abandoned for years already simply because the developers got bored or couldn't be arsed to go back and finish them.
 

Kane

I have many names
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
22,478
Location
Drug addicted, mentally ill gays HQ
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
My problem is that Steam doesn't seem to have any way of checking whether Early Access developers are actually competent enough to get around to ever finishing their games.

And there will never be a way to 100% guarantee that. Investing in early access is just that: an investement. You're gambling your money on the positive outcome of the game's development.
 

Hoaxmetal

Arcane
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
9,173
Desura's Alpha Fund is filled to the brim with games that have been abandoned for years already simply because the developers got bored or couldn't be arsed to go back and finish them.

I think that there's also the simple problem of devs getting too much money at once. Either they'll start working on too many things at once or just will enjoy the sudden extra cash for their own needs. Imagine being Notch, working on your little pet project and over a short period of time getting all that money - I sure wouln't mind stopping working at my late 20s/early 30s or w/e.
 

Spectacle

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
8,363
I can't see any reason why gaben would sell Valve. He's already filthy rich, and Valve provides him with infrastructure and constant income to fund any kind of crazy project he might want to play around with.
My problem is that Steam doesn't seem to have any way of checking whether Early Access developers are actually competent enough to get around to ever finishing their games.

And there will never be a way to 100% guarantee that. Investing in early access is just that: an investement. You're gambling your money on the positive outcome of the game's development.
Depends on the game. Many "early access" games are playable and worth the money even if they're not finished yet. Caveat Emptor applies of course, but a good rule of thumb is to only pay for early access if you want to play the game in its current state.
 

tuluse

Arcane
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
11,400
Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong
And that's exactly the problem I have with it. The developers have absolutely no obligation to not do just that. I mean, I assume that around 90% of all studios are owned and operated by morally sound individuals that are in business for making games first and money second. But that still leaves 10% that potentially just want to screw you over. Only paying for existing and finished products effectively zeros that possibility.
You must really hate kickstarter then.
 

Kane

I have many names
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
22,478
Location
Drug addicted, mentally ill gays HQ
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
And that's exactly the problem I have with it. The developers have absolutely no obligation to not do just that. I mean, I assume that around 90% of all studios are owned and operated by morally sound individuals that are in business for making games first and money second. But that still leaves 10% that potentially just want to screw you over. Only paying for existing and finished products effectively zeros that possibility.
You must really hate kickstarter then.
Hate is the wrong word but yes, I am highly critical of KS.
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,745
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
And that's exactly the problem I have with it. The developers have absolutely no obligation to not do just that. I mean, I assume that around 90% of all studios are owned and operated by morally sound individuals that are in business for making games first and money second. But that still leaves 10% that potentially just want to screw you over. Only paying for existing and finished products effectively zeros that possibility.

Well, there's always the possibility of being screwed over with finished products too: bugged game won't be patched, multiplayer game gets abandoned in a wekk, or the game can just be really shitty
 

Kane

I have many names
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
22,478
Location
Drug addicted, mentally ill gays HQ
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
Well, there's always the possibility of being screwed over with finished products too: bugged game won't be patched, multiplayer game gets abandoned in a wekk, or the game can just be really shitty

Sure, but you know what you get if you buy a finished product. Plus, reviews.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom