Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Crispy™ There has never been a walking simulator with a good story

Zed Duke of Banville

Dungeon Master
Patron
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
13,279
if i find this Story guy who is driving all these bad games i'm gonna make him pay. By making him play every walking simulator.
Walking simulators might be easier to play than Arcanum, though.

Narrative-Writing-In-CRPGs-Was-AMistake.jpg
 

Hell Swarm

Learned
Joined
Jun 16, 2023
Messages
2,144
I agree with this notion. RPGs are the best genre to deliver good stories in games, but even if you look outside the genre the best stories are usually not delivered in walking simulators. Look at Metal Gear, many people call the saga movie games, and it certainly is very movie-like, but you can't deny the gameplay and the mechanics are there always supporting the story being told.
RPGs are one of the worst ways to tell an interactive story. Games as a medium have issues with stories but JRPGs do 5 minutes of dialog then an hour of gameplay before 5 minutes more dialog. It's not built into the game at all.

CRPGs can be even worse where I spend 2 weeks collecting wolf pelts before I find the next main story mission.
A good story in a walking sim is a oxymoron. Games as a medium are defined by the fact that the player gets to be an active participant in the story. Meaning that in some way the player is essential for the story to even occur and procced. However when all the player does is walk from A to B and then C then what kind of relevance can the player even have? The player has to be by definition essentially irrelevant because the only interaction they can perform is barely interactive to begin with.
Walking sims do make the player an active participant. Still Wakes the Deep as about as walking sim as they come but I did control Caz and I did use inputs to fix problems that manifested story content. I had to fix the jennies and I did and that made something else go to shit. But I got more dialog from characters and I progressed the story.
 

kangaxx

Arbiter
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
1,722
Location
atop a flaming horse
Recently played the first and only walking simulator I've ever "enjoyed"... Pools. Creepy in its own way, but not even a modicum of gameplay or story.

People always talk about Firewatch as having a good story... no idea why, it's shite.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom