Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Trent in Trouble: Beamdog forbidden from selling and patching BG:EE, BG2:EE on "indefinite hold"

SwiftCrack

Arcane
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Messages
1,836
There were some more details on that here: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/190432/postmortem_overhaul_games_.php?print=1

Frankly I think EA fucked Trent on that one. BioWare probably reported that there was some tard trying to leech off art assets off them to corporate and they were probably like: "Let me get this straight, there's some guy that wants us to give him the art assets to one of your games, for free so that a competitor can make money with it? LOL fuck that loser, tell him all data was lost."
:smug:

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.


For people, maybe. For corporations like EA stupidity is only a convenient excuse every time they are caught being malicious.
Losing art assets sounds like a work of an individual.

Sounds like rEApers to me.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom