Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Twitter embeds not displaying on firefox

pakoito

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
3,092
Probably a request for help more than feedback. For some reason nothing from twitter seems to be loading on firefox, with or without uBlock active.

ugmW9ER.png
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Self-Ejected

Shitty Kitty

Self-Ejected
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
556
is feature, not bug

EDIT: best non-Firefox browser options are Ungoogled Chromium, Brave and OperaGX IMO
 

Sentinel

Arcane
Joined
Nov 18, 2015
Messages
6,670
Location
Ommadawn
Based on the chromium web browser
Why not just use a chromium build by itself then?
same reason you'd use an improved fork of software over the original?
What improvements are those?
 

pakoito

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
3,092
Based on the chromium web browser
Why not just use a chromium build by itself then?
same reason you'd use an improved fork of software over the original?
What improvements are those?
A heightened sense of smugness, because Brave c-levels are as trashfire as everywhere else.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Based on the chromium web browser
Why not just use a chromium build by itself then?
same reason you'd use an improved fork of software over the original?
What improvements are those?
better performance, better privacy by default(anti-fingerprinting, HTTPS upgrading by default, etc.,), integrated(read: native performance) adblocker, builtin TOR for private browsing tabs, IPFS support.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Based on the chromium web browser
Why not just use a chromium build by itself then?
same reason you'd use an improved fork of software over the original?
What improvements are those?
A heightened sense of smugness, because Brave c-levels are as trashfire as everywhere else.
keep using a browser that tracks you and is developed by people who want you in prison bro
https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/browser_privacy.pdf
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
We study six browsers: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox,Apple Safari, Brave Browser, Microsoft Edge and YandexBrowser. For Brave with its default settings we did not findany use of identifiers allowing tracking of IP address overtime, and no sharing of the details of web pages visited withbackend servers. Chrome, Firefox and Safari all share detailsof web pages visited with backend servers.
"In the first (most private) group lies Brave, in the second Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, and in the third (least private) group lie Edge and Yandex."
 

Sentinel

Arcane
Joined
Nov 18, 2015
Messages
6,670
Location
Ommadawn
Based on the chromium web browser
Why not just use a chromium build by itself then?
same reason you'd use an improved fork of software over the original?
What improvements are those?
A heightened sense of smugness, because Brave c-levels are as trashfire as everywhere else.
keep using a browser that tracks you and is developed by people who want you in prison bro
https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/browser_privacy.pdf
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
We study six browsers: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox,Apple Safari, Brave Browser, Microsoft Edge and YandexBrowser. For Brave with its default settings we did not findany use of identifiers allowing tracking of IP address overtime, and no sharing of the details of web pages visited withbackend servers. Chrome, Firefox and Safari all share detailsof web pages visited with backend servers.
"In the first (most private) group lies Brave, in the second Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, and in the third (least private) group lie Edge and Yandex."
can I use uMatrix and uBlock in Brave?
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
50,754
Codex Year of the Donut
Based on the chromium web browser
Why not just use a chromium build by itself then?
same reason you'd use an improved fork of software over the original?
What improvements are those?
A heightened sense of smugness, because Brave c-levels are as trashfire as everywhere else.
keep using a browser that tracks you and is developed by people who want you in prison bro
https://www.scss.tcd.ie/Doug.Leith/pubs/browser_privacy.pdf
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
We study six browsers: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox,Apple Safari, Brave Browser, Microsoft Edge and YandexBrowser. For Brave with its default settings we did not findany use of identifiers allowing tracking of IP address overtime, and no sharing of the details of web pages visited withbackend servers. Chrome, Firefox and Safari all share detailsof web pages visited with backend servers.
"In the first (most private) group lies Brave, in the second Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, and in the third (least private) group lie Edge and Yandex."
can I use uMatrix and uBlock in Brave?
They should work fine, but I'd suggest disabling ublock adblockers as the native brave blockers should be faster.
Brave is compatible with nearly all chrome extensions.
 

Lady_Error

█▓▒░ ░▒▓█
Patron
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
1,879,250
Brave is a good, lean browser - but it keeps crashing once every couple of days for me.

And its process cannot even be stopped in the taskbar, requiring a reboot. Never had that problem with Firefox.
 

Lady_Error

█▓▒░ ░▒▓█
Patron
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
1,879,250
Task Manager, where you can close running processes after some shit crashes but is still running parts of it.
 

Twiglard

Poland Stronk
Patron
Staff Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2014
Messages
7,240
Location
Poland
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut
You can add this to about:config.
Code:
urlclassifier.features.socialtracking.skipURLs = *.twitter.com, *.twimg.com
urlclassifier.trackingSkipURLs = *.twitter.com, *.twimg.com
Then go to twimg.com and twitter.com and disable cookies & persistent storage for them.

You'll be able to to turn on tracking protection with the embeds visible, while not letting them actually track you.
 

hayst

Educated
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Messages
128
CanvasBlocker is a nice anti-fingerprinting extension for firefox and chromium. Good option menu.
 

hayst

Educated
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Messages
128
There's a fake mode that generates a fingerprint, "But values obtained by the APIs are altered so that a consistent fingerprinting is not possible."

https://github.com/kkapsner/CanvasBlocker
Got any sites in the wild doing fingerprinting? Is the industry doing it at all?
When you're using the extension it just tells you what it's adding in fake mode not if the javascript was being used to track you through fingerprinting. You can pretty much assume the big internet players do use it. I'll quote a paper called; Fingerprinting the Fingerprinters: Learning to Detect Browser Fingerprinting Behaviors from 2021 that says, "We find that browser fingerprinting is now present on more than 10% of the top-100K websites and over a quarter of the top-10K websites. We also discover previously unreported uses of JavaScript APIs by fingerprinting scripts suggesting that they are looking to exploit APIs in new and unexpected ways."
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom