Sacred82
Self-Ejected
:trigglypuff:
Historically, which era do you find more aesthetically interesting?
It's nubsidian we're talking about here. Practically everyone from the Obsidian that made good games is gone.What surprise? Was there ever a doubt Obsidian would deliver a good game?
You don't know that the Codex considers PoE shit?What surprise? Was there ever a doubt Obsidian would deliver a good game?
You don't know that the Codex considers PoE shit?What surprise? Was there ever a doubt Obsidian would deliver a good game?
Not me personally tbh but yeah, I'm influenced
Yes, and taking 10 times as long for everything since they're consulting twitch chat for choices.Are they just running the first hour again? Not worth my time if it's the same shit Obsidian has already streamed.
What people think about PoE doesn't really matter since Tranny is made by a different team.
Don't be like people such as FreeKaner that think a game is made by a disembodied entity called Obsidian instead of being made by a team of people, he thinks all Obsidian games will be good even though everyone credited for them being good is gone (MCA, Ziets, Gonzalez, Fenstermaker, etc)
Actually there is great architecture and art at that time, on Mesopotamia alone, each city from Ur to Babylon had their own culture and art. I find the fantasy element the weakest part of this game.Bronze age is a boring part of history in terms of aesthetics. I am glad they went for bronze age society but more fantasy aesthetics.
Actually there is great architecture and art at that time, on Mesopotamia alone, each city from Ur to Babylon had their own culture and art. I find the fantasy element the weakest part of this game.Bronze age is a boring part of history in terms of aesthetics. I am glad they went for bronze age society but more fantasy aesthetics.
Darklands on sumerian lands would be cool. Something like Conan or Dark Sun would be better.
Over the top fantasy always make me cringe, I think the fantasy part is clashing hard with the bronze age thing.