Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Update The Witcher to 1.5 - NOW!!!

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
I don't know how it is in your language, but in english "good" and "perfection" are two different terms as far as I know.

continue to support the game after release even though you didn't like it
Give them a medal for post-release support of their game. I mean who else does that?
 

bhlaab

Erudite
Joined
Nov 19, 2008
Messages
1,787
MetalCraze said:
Give them a medal for post-release support of their game.

nobody fucking is in fact for whatever bs reason youre shitting on them for it
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,544
Licaon_Kter said:
all were released containing copies of Neverwinter Nights, Shadows of Undrentide and Hordes of the Underdark, as well.
Now if only The Witcher had a decent expansion pack or two...
 

Burning Bridges

Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
27,571
Location
Tampon Bay
Sorry for asking again but has anyone succeeded in using savegames from 1.4?

Reason is I have saves in which I am half way through the game and I don't want to start over.
 

Burning Bridges

Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
27,571
Location
Tampon Bay
I wonder what you make of this news post on the official forum:

We just wanted to clear up some recent media reports concerning new projects being prepared by CD Projekt RED and Metropolis by noting that the news confirming the two games was a misunderstanding and is not true. The statement from Michał Kiciński published in the last issue of CD-Action magazine was a bit awkwardly edited, significantly changing its meaning. Below you’ll find Michał’s comment on the situation:

'The interview was edited by CD-Action without informing me, and after the changes the meaning of my answer concerning our studios’ future plans became significantly distorted. I realize I could have expressed myself more clearly; this is my mistake, and should not have happened, as I’ve been doing interviews for quite some time and I’m careful with such details. However, the fact is that the question was edited and accompanied with an editorial lead that is not a quote from my statement (and which directly speaks about The Witcher’s sequel), distorted the issue of next RED’s project and caused quite a big confusion. Regardless of whose fault it is (a bit of mine as well), I’d like to apologize for the confusion (and also for the fact that this response did not appear as quick, as it should have). As for the most interesting thing – namely our future projects – you’ll still need to wait for official statements.’

After the cancellation of console port, wouldn't you expect them to shift up a gear for Witcher 2, instead of this near denial? What I am reading in between the lines is that TW2 PC was their plan until very recently (time of the interview) but that they or their publishers now having other plans some restructuring is going on. I don't like the sound of that at all, as the whole cancellation thing was a shock and surprise, and I don't see how they can survive it unscathed.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom