2house2fly
Magister
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 1,877
If the price I have to pay for MCA being put in charge of a game is that game being a Fallout 4 spinoff then...
itemization were greatly improved
If you could get MCA or some ex-Obsidian (because Obsidian sucks now) guys to make a spinoff in the FO4 engine it would be solid.
If the price I have to pay for MCA being put in charge of a game is that game being a Fallout 4 spinoff then...
oh yess, validate my opinion baby,
*rubs nipples*
oh yeah, right there, my opinion, validates it bby. oooooo yeeaaaaa oooooooo heeeeeya
^p much the reason why people make and watch these videos
They've been mailing it in on DLC since Skyrim. Even though the majority of FO3 DLC was terrible at least they put forth some effort into it.
This video is similair to that about Fallout 3, but author is diffrent and in my opinion video is better than that about F3 as author logically and with calm voice pointed out every aspect of the story and explained why main story is shit. Entire video is very good but from 11:37 to 1:00:00 and then since 1:06:32 it is pure gold. If you never want to try Fallout 4 there you can gain all the knowledge that is needed to hate the game.
I dunno if I'd call that Nuka-World thing 'proper-sized.'They've been mailing it in on DLC since Skyrim. Even though the majority of FO3 DLC was terrible at least they put forth some effort into it.
Huh? Fallout 3 got one "true" expansion DLC and a bunch of linear trash like Operation Anchorage, Mothership Zeta and whatever the one with the edible baby was. Fallut 4 got a bunch of bite-sized trash, The Mechanist, and then two proper-sized expansions.
We've been on this train for 15 years already.It takes an hour and a half to explain why a game is complete shit and not even remotely an actual Fallout game?