Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Warhammer Online private server (Return of Reckoning)

Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Messages
1,272
The PvP is basically WoW's battlegrounds, just more balanced. I much prefer Guild Wars in a lot of ways, but it's fun enough.

What do you like about Guild Wars 1's PvP?
 

Lacrymas

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
18,838
Pathfinder: Wrath

What do you like about Guild Wars 1's PvP?
It's much more balanced for one because GW was conceptualized as a PvP game from the start (and because they decoupled PvE and PvP balance from one another). There are no classes which feel like easy mode or classes which feel impotent unless played perfectly (WoW is especially guilty of this). The combat itself is much more robust and less floaty in GW compared to both WH Online and WoW. It's much more clear what is happening and to whom in GW. The build variety is staggering. There isn't a loot treadmill, which equalizes the playing field in that regard. The interplay and systems in GW are much more complex even though you only have 8 skills at a time. All in all, I think Guild Wars is a much more mature and focused game, even if they kind of muddied the waters a bit as the expansions came out.

Don't get me wrong, GW does have its problems, but the grievous ones are more theoretical than actual because they stopped developing it before they became a thing. Which is too bad because all of them had solutions and there is no other game like GW in existence. GW is still being played though, and has a healthy if small population, so that's one good news.
 
Last edited:

Morgoth

Ph.D. in World Saving
Patron
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
36,131
Location
Clogging the Multiverse with a Crowbar
Oh, I bought this back in 2008 and played it for a couple of months, when MMOs were still MMORPGs. It was weird... but memorable.

After fucking around with Turtle WoW, I'm now itching to return to either this, or DAoC. Which one is the Codex darling?
 

NwNgger

Educated
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Messages
137
I'll just fuck around with both and then settle with one.
Warhammer Online is a more focused PvP game whereas DAoC is more chaotic. As long as you tackle both as the PvP centric games they are and not a themepark MMO, you'll have fun.
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
7,695
Because it's a tiny studio that exists solely to pump RMT money out of the wreckage of the TORtanic.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom