rusty_shackleford
Arcane
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 50,754
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/827f4/827f469d6c6241e8dd5f5c243cba2ef0ea43cde2" alt="Codex Year of the Donut Codex Year of the Donut"
your odds of making money as a streamer are probably high than a chef unless by making money you mean being paid $12 an hour to be a prep cook at some shitty backwater restaurant
People who need 100 hours to play through BG2 are probably really slow readers who take an hour to get through each dialog. It's okay. Some people are just born retarded. You don't have to feel ashamed for it.
25 feet is a good length for RPGs.
We're discussing first time playthroughs.Asinine topic. Imagine I said 100 hours is the ideal length, because that's how long it took me to beat Wizardry 7. Then I replayed Wizardry 7 and was able to beat it faster. Does that mean the game got worse because it was no longer the ideal length?
Are you sure? Longer play time means prolonged development, AAA budgets, troonification, niggerization, and filler. It could be a rule of thumb: take a game's innate playtime, double it, and get a second half that isn't worth playing.Good RPGs are rare now, so the longer the better.
I like to get at least one hour per dollar spent