Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Where are you on the FEV vs radiation debate

StrangeCase

Educated
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
252
Location
A trite metaphor near you
^ I'd tend to agree, but this is Bethesda we're talking about. I'm not even just throwing out mindless Beth hate; these are the guys who, when talking about this very game, acknowledged sacrificing plot continuity for a gameplay element "because it was cool". It's just not one of their priorities, you know?
 

kingcomrade

Kingcomrade
Edgy
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
26,884
Location
Cognitive Elite HQ
I don't even know what the hell you guys are talking about. "oh gosh i pissed my pants because fallout seemed like it was from the 80s" I don't even know what that means.
 

Archaeon

Scholar
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
353
Location
Gypoland
kingcomrade said:
I don't even know what the hell you guys are talking about. "oh gosh i pissed my pants because fallout seemed like it was from the 80s" I don't even know what that means.

You're a clueless sod, aren't you?
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom