I finished reading Dracula not too long ago and I didn't felt there was much gay. But maybe I just missed it
It's more inferred from metatextual sources and real events from Bram Stoker's life. In the book, Jonathan Harker's imprisonment in Dracula's castle could be seen as homoerotic (like beauty and the beast, but the beauty is a man) and Dracula commanding his three wives not to touch Jonathan because Jonathan belongs to him alone. Even though Dracula doesn't feed directly from any man, he does drink all of the protagonists' blood through Lucy (they gave their blood for a transfusion). Dracula also turns others into creatures like himself, which has been suggested to be analogous to the invention of the word "homosexual" at the end of the 19th century (around gay people, more "suddenly" spring up). Everything else is derived from Bram Stoker's life, like I said. The conspicuous absence of Oscar Wilde in any of his writings; his letters to Walt Whitman; Abraham Van Helsing being an author self-insert (Abraham = Bram), the only character not showing any romantic interest in women, etc.
