Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

NWN2: Storm of Zehir at E3

Murk

Arcane
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
13,459
^ I think one such explanation is that a beginner would be a peasant with no PC class, and upon achieving a PC class you are officially "trained"

take for instance a fighter, you come in with all simple/martial weapon proficiencies, that means you know how to use at least two dozen different weapons

add in two feats and those are basically skills you developed in training

the problem is that while that's fine for flavor, mechanically, it leads a kobold killing you 'cuz it rolled a 20, and considering how many kobolds you'll fight in your career as a level 1 douchebag (over 20) there's a good chance you'll get that crit straight to your taint
 

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
Level one characters are considered fully proficient in their profession and are more skilled than NPC classes. For instance, a level one fighter would be the equivalent of a freshly trained member of a special forces division. Somebody who hadn't undergone any training yet would effectively be classless, and treated as a monster. If they reached majority and weren't pursuing a skilled profession, they generally tend to get rolled out as one of the commoner/aristocrat/warrior/expert classes, depending on which one is most appropriate.

There's a single book that could dispel the whole mystique behind this debate, just letting you all know...
 

Kaiserin

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
4,082
Okay troll, I'll bite.

Cat:
Tiny Animal
Hit Dice: 1/2 d8(2hp)
Speed: 30ft.
AC: 14
Attack: Claw, melee, +4, 1d2-4 (1dmg always)
Saves: Fort +2, Ref +4, Will +1
Feats: Weapon finesse

1st Level Commoner:
Hit dice: 1d4+Con Mod (3hp avg)
Speed:30ft
AC:10+ Dex mod
Attack: Sickle, +0+Str Mod, 1d6 damage+ Str Mod(4dmg avg)
Saves:+0 to all base saves

Commoners, as 'average npcs' tend to have an overall average of 11 for each ability score. These are going to be higher and lower for each score of course, unlike a monster who has a static block of well...stats.

Even with an ability line up of all 10's though, the extra damage and HP are a huge advantage over the cat. Not to mention that a common could have proficiency in any simple weapon, which puts a 1d8 in their hands. Most commoners would 'one hit' a cat, 30% of the time.
 

Shoelip

Arbiter
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
1,814
What you need to worry about are badgers. A single lucky badger can take down four level 1 PCs.
 

Murk

Arcane
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
13,459
dude my dire fiendish half-dragon red ant will rip your badger to bits
 

Murk

Arcane
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
13,459
i have a sibirski tooshkanchik, natural cold resistance
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
285
Amazing, this SoZ. Truly innovative gameplay... a melange of Tycoon-strategy and role-playing game.... just omg.

Cryo's Dune, anyone?

Obsidian lads really got guts, if they're so willing to test new grounds.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom