Official Codex Discord Server

  1. Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
    Dismiss Notice

Codex Interview RPG Codex Interview: Seven Dragon Saga - A Return To Golden Boxes

Discussion in 'RPG News & Content' started by Zed, Oct 10, 2014.

  1. Zed Codex Staff Patron

    Zed
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    16,606
    Codex USB, 2014
    Tags: Seven Dragon Saga; Tactical Simulations Interactive

    [​IMG]

    Tactical Simulations Interactive, or TSI Games, were kind enough to answer some of our questions regarding their upcoming (spiritual) successor to the GoldBox RPGs of the late 80s and early 90s: Seven Dragon Saga. Set in a new fantasy universe and being based on different pen & paper ruleset, one may wonder if this game will be able to live up to the legacy of the classics. Well, I don't know. This is an interview; not a preview, not a review. You silly goose.

    From this interview, we learn with certainty that TSI will indeed go the route of crowdfunding Seven Dragon Saga. Let this be a lesson to everybody seeking factuals from media outlets such as Kotaku. We also learn a thing or two about party sizes, combat, the world map and more.

    A couple of cool snippets:

    In the press-release, one bullet-point touches on the importance of choices and consequences in the game. How will these choices be present, and how are you keeping track of the consequences? Will you be using something like a reputation system? Also, will there be any moral or ethical dispositions for characters – something like D&Ds alignment system?

    The player's party represents the Empire in a newly conquered land during a time of crisis, so the NPCs on all sides fall into factions, which we will track with a reputation system. Players' choices at critical junctures can also modify the relative strengths of these faction. For instance, if the player liberates a border fort, he may have the option to raise the flag of one faction or another, granting them control of the fortress and surrounding lands. Should they come to regret the choice, another conquest of the fort may be in order.

    We are currently balancing out a Goals system for individual characters. During character creation, the player will be able to select from a limited list of Goals. When the resolution of a quest aligns with that character's goals, they receive a benefit. Not all quest resolutions will have the full range of Goal alignment, so simply having a 'Greedy' party will not provide an optimum solution. Choosing a range of sometimes conflicting goals provides the party a potentially greater benefit, but may begin to clash with the player's personal goals, or lead to the alienation of useful factions. ​

    You have made it clear that Seven Dragon Saga is not another tale of a simple farmer's rise to power and glory. What exactly does this entail for the gameplay? Will the game still have the progression relative to a beginner's campaign, but cosmetically scaled up in power? Or will it be more like a playing a high level campaign off-the-bat?

    Missing all of your attacks and having 4 HP simply isn't fun. Players can expect to start at a mid-level of proficiency with a reasonable set of skills and abilities to choose from. This means the player will not advance as quickly as some games where 10th level is only a couple of hours away, but endgame characters are more flexible and powerful. Part of this is through incremental improvements (spending points on abilities), part through acquiring new powers, and part through equipment (loot and constructed). ​​

    Enjoy the interview and have a great weekend.

    Read the full article: RPG Codex Interview: Seven Dragon Saga - A Return To Golden Boxes
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 22
    ^ Top  
  2. Dorateen Arcane

    Dorateen
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    2,954
    Location:
    The Crystal Mist Mountains
    You know, Zed, when I posted the kotaku article and their "revelations", I did say: Take it for what it's worth, considering the source

    But this was a good interview. On some points I don't agree with TSI, but overall, I'm really digging their design philosophy. I hope they stick with their intuition on party size, and go with the full six from creation.

    Nice work!
     
    ^ Top  
  3. Zombra Arcane Patron

    Zombra
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    7,146
    Location:
    Black Goat Woods !@#*%&^
    Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
    Wow, I like the sound of that Goals idea per character. Seems like a very easy way to get some consequential role-playing mechanics into what otherwise would likely be a totally straightforward battle simulator. I like RP, so, yeah. Looking forward to having my party bicker and disagree, just like in every P&P game I've ever played.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  4. LESS T_T Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    LESS T_T
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,971
    Codex 2014
    Great interview! :salute: Now I can tell that someone indeed interviewd the RPG developers.

    My hope for this game goes up even more.
     
    ^ Top  
  5. Zorba the Hutt Arcane Weasel

    Zorba the Hutt
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,865,663
    Good interview, thanks. Also like what I'm hearing so far.

    But who am I kidding... no matter what they said I'd probably still back their kickstarter.
     
    ^ Top  
  6. ERYFKRAD Barbarian Patron

    ERYFKRAD
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    14,584
    Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
    Cool stuff.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  7. Duraframe300 Arcane

    Duraframe300
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,938
    :balance:
     
    ^ Top  
  8. stony3k Augur Patron

    stony3k
    Joined:
    May 8, 2007
    Messages:
    453
    Well they're going about fixing it the right way - start at mid level, rather than the Sawyer way, which was to change the rules.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  9. Infinitron I post news Patron

    Infinitron
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    76,661
    Grab the Codex by the pussy Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker
    I hardly see how that matters. They're still taking away that low level experience from you - and defining it as non-fun, to boot.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  10. FeelTheRads Arcane Patron

    FeelTheRads
    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    12,409
    Besides the obvious exaggeration of "all attacks", actually that is fun, if not for anything else then by simply the great feeling when you start to level up and are able to kill the stuff that you couldn't before.
    Not that Sawyerists can ever get that. All the time the same challenge cuz then you apply tacticoolies like mashing the space button 5 times per second
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  11. stony3k Augur Patron

    stony3k
    Joined:
    May 8, 2007
    Messages:
    453
    Low level DnD combat wasn't fun. It got a lot better once you got a few levels. Now this isn't DnD, so they could have made the systems better but that would be pure Sawyerism.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  12. Jedi Master Radek Arcane

    Jedi Master Radek
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2013
    Messages:
    2,440
    :argh::argh::argh::argh::argh::argh::argh::argh::argh:
    :mob:
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  13. Grunker RPG Codex Ghost Patron

    Grunker
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    21,517
    Location:
    Copenhagen
    Codex 2012 Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
    "TSI are Sawyerists" - FeelTheRads 2014
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 4
    ^ Top  
  14. Roguey Arcane Sawyerite Sawyerist Sawyer's Bride No Fun Allowed

    Roguey
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    24,719
    What makes you think you won't be starting at level 1 here? They said "start at a mid-level of proficiency" as compared to D&D. They're not going to make you advance three levels with six characters at character creation.
     
    ^ Top  
  15. Infinitron I post news Patron

    Infinitron
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    76,661
    Grab the Codex by the pussy Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker
    They might! That way, if the system is symmetric, low-level enemies that are weak like a low-level AD&D character can still exist.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2015
    ^ Top  
  16. Roguey Arcane Sawyerite Sawyerist Sawyer's Bride No Fun Allowed

    Roguey
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    24,719
    Sounds a bit MMO/DA/4e inspired.
     
    ^ Top  
  17. Transfiguring Roar Arcane Patron

    Transfiguring Roar
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,253
    Location:
    Australia
    Shadorwun: Hong Kong
    Excellent Q&A, good job Codex!

    And, SDS sounds very promising, looking forward to the kickstarter!
     
    ^ Top  
  18. Stainless Veteran Arcane

    Stainless Veteran
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,133
    Location:
    Vostroya
    Err. Why there's so many people who found low-level (A)DnD campaigns no fun? For me many low-level campaigns was way more fun and challenging than high-level, which were often abominations, either to prone to munchkinism and exploiting, or artificially made more challenging but still remained not really interesting.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 2
    ^ Top  
  19. GlutenBurger Arbiter

    GlutenBurger
    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    644
    This is actually getting exciting, which is a little worrying. I had been hoping to die cold and jaded.
     
    ^ Top  
  20. Roguey Arcane Sawyerite Sawyerist Sawyer's Bride No Fun Allowed

    Roguey
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    24,719
    Too much chaos.

    Level three-through the early teens is what most people seem to prefer.
     
    ^ Top  
  21. thesheeep Arcane

    thesheeep
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    7,652
    Location:
    Tampere, Finland
    The problem is not that low-level/low-skill (for non-level based systems) cannot be fun per se. Of course it can. Other systems manage that rather well.

    The problem is that DnD (pre 4th, at least) just sucks at it, as it leads low-level ad absurdum.
    It just throws you into all kinds of ridiculous situations, like a well rested mage being only able to cast one flimsy spell for the whole day (which can still miss, what a joy), or an elf dying from a single attack by a cat, or a thief not being able to open even the simplest of locks. You just suck at everything, which is simply not believable if you do not happen to play a child. Hell, a new pig farmer in DSA (yes, you can play everything there) is orders of magnitude more powerful than lvl1 DnD characters in relation to early threats. Hence all groups I know always start at level 3 or above as that is where low-level slowly leaves the absurdly weak area and enters the "this is a beginner" area, where characters do not suddenly drop if they got an arrow to the knee.

    All the broken systems of DnD (which means quite a lot of them, really) shove their shortcomings right into your face at low levels. It was clearly not designed for this.

    What you probably found fun was that feeling of your character actually being in danger. Which is really only there at low levels in DnD. As you said, later on it becomes challenging only by introducing artificial means or cheesiness. Other systems (both Shadowrun and DSA manage that well) always give you the feeling of danger if the situation is realistically dangerous for someone of your character's skill.
    In DnD, this only happens at a certain level range (IMO 3 - 10 with 3.5 DnD), which is kind of the sweet spot there. Below and above, it becomes increasingly absurd.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  22. Stainless Veteran Arcane

    Stainless Veteran
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,133
    Location:
    Vostroya
    Chaos? What chaos? And yeah, I'm aware that some people prefer level 4+ and beyond, I just didn't think that it was mainstream opinion.

    I was playing ADnD since 98` till '00 and never I encountered "an elf dying from a single attack by a cat, or a thief not being able to open even the simplest of locks". I played as thief, btw, and I can safely say that my thief at low levels could open simplest of locks, thank you very much. Mages I give you, but given that they tend to became really OP, so early suckage at least somewhat compensated it. Also, magic missile never failed our casters.

    What systems exactly are you talking about? I'm not the biggest fan of (A)DnD, but I don't really remember negative system's traits which show themselves in lower level campaigns and absent from higher level ones.

    Nope, while I certainly enjoy feelings of danger, what I like is mainly the smaller scope of both campaign's story and obstacles which character can overcome. As for that DnD becomes absurd after level 10 I certainly agree, I just don't think that it sucks so much at level 1-3 that it negates positive traits of low-level adventures.
     
    ^ Top  
  23. Roguey Arcane Sawyerite Sawyerist Sawyer's Bride No Fun Allowed

    Roguey
    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    24,719
    Miss-fests plus dying to unlucky crits. Needs more numbers to avoid both those things.
     
    ^ Top  
  24. GlutenBurger Arbiter

    GlutenBurger
    Joined:
    May 8, 2010
    Messages:
    644
    Why would you use magic missile at level one? This is when colour spray, sleep, and grease are absolute nukes. 1d4 guaranteed damage is worthless.
     
    ^ Top  
  25. Stainless Veteran Arcane

    Stainless Veteran
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,133
    Location:
    Vostroya
    Where did you find in my post that our mages used only MM? I just wanted to point that there's at least one commonly known spell which doesn't have a chance to fail and auto-hits.


    I see. Misses in melee are, indeed, kinda dumb in stimulationist viewpoint. As for crits - well, while they may pose a problem in tabletop games, I kinda fail to see what's so bad in dying from unlucky crit in PC RPG (at least if not playing ironman).
     
    ^ Top  

(buying stuff via the above buttons helps us pay the hosting bills, thanks!)