Guys, it's true that I enjoy laughing at your tantrums, but, in any case, I’d like to make a serious contribution to the discussion, even though I know you’ll twist it however you please.
It’s not entirely out of the question that there were black people in Bohemia during that period because, at the time, trade (including slaves and 'servants' in general) was very extensive.
Last year, I was reading this book:
Francesco Carletti - My Voyage Around the World, which you can also find in German. It’s the account of the travels of this Florentine merchant between Cape Verde, Central and Latin America, China, Eastern Asia and Europe around 1600. He dealt in both goods and human 'cargo.' He certainly wasn’t a trailblazer, and from reading his account, it’s clear that what he was doing was common practice across Europe.
Well, at one point, without batting an eye, he says, 'Returning from Korea (which he calls by its name at the time), I brought back a korean boy, who now lives in Rome and answers to the name Antonio.'
So, there was a Korean named Antonio living in Rome in 1600. And this didn’t surprise anyone. There probably weren’t a thousand or even a hundred like him, but there were Koreans n Rome around 1600. I don’t see why the same couldn’t have happened with a Black person in Bohemia, considering how much 'black human resources' were being moved around at the time.
Link to the author