Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Pillars of Eternity II turn-based mode confirmed, coming January 24th

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,236
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Tags: Josh Sawyer; Obsidian Entertainment; Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire

Obsidian confirmed today that the Pillars of Eternity II turn-based mode they accidentally released last month is an official thing. It's coming out as part of Patch 4.1 later this week on January 24th. Josh Sawyer introduced the new mode in a video that was distributed to a number of news outlets, including MMORPG.com and Shacknews. Here's MMORPG's copy:



Other articles released today include an interview with Josh at PCGamesN and a preview of the turn-based mode at TechRaptor. I'll quote the latter here:

Pillars of Eternity was supposed to play just like Baldur’s Gate. BioWare’s first CRPG popularized pausable real-time combat back in the 90s, successfully implementing the Dungeons & Dragons 2nd Edition ruleset. As the isometric CRPG genre evolved, some players have come to express a great distaste for this combat mode. Their arguments are usually that it doesn’t feel tactical enough, especially when played with the AI on. It’s often just buffing your characters up, selecting targets, and watching them hit-and-miss for a couple of minutes. We can see why Obsidian Entertainment decided to add a turn-based mode to their award-winning RPG Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire.

My personal experience with the combat in Deadfire was actually very positive, though I do generally prefer turn-based combat in CRPGs. Compared with the first Pillars, Deadfire not only felt more engaging, it also felt more fluid and less hacky. I still like the first game, but, with Deadfire, the developers realized that there’s room to evolve beyond nostalgia. Despite Deadfire’s reportedly poor commercial performance, it was a step in the right direction. This direction points to a place where classic RPGs can still thrive in the current industry. We had the chance to do a hands-on preview, hoping that it adds a new dimension to the game. You can’t switch back and forth between the two modes. You also can’t use an existing save in real-time. When you start a new game you’ll get to choose either real-time or turn-based, then you can’t go back.

The player character and the companions still move in real-time, and you can still pause. You can also inflict stealth attacks in real-time right before you go into turn-based combat mode. In that sense, it resembles my experience with Mutant Year Zero: Road to Eden, where I can set up my characters in advance before the actual turn-based battle. The difference is that there are no tiles. Movement is handled in in-game meters, with every character being able to move exactly 10.2 meters. There is currently no menu option to change it. Even if you run out of meters you can still execute an action. A melee attack requires close engagement with an enemy, obviously.

You can only do one Standard or Cast action per turn, alongside your movement. Clearly, you execute Standard actions instantly. Cast actions, you guessed it, involve spellcasting, and take up two turns. It’s awkward to watch magic users spellcasting with flailing arms waiting for the turn to release it, though it suits the feel of a classic RPG. There are also Free actions, mostly buffs or special skills, and apparently, there’s no cap on them. The general impression is that the spells and skills feel more essential in turn-based. If you can use a spell or skill to knock out an enemy, it’s one less nuisance to worry about.

On the whole, there is much to like in this implementation, though it’s too early to say how it’ll play like in an entire playthrough. There is the fact that, despite all its flaws, pausable real-time at least allows you go on autopilot when you have to face swarms of feeble creatures. Turn-based requires that you are always on alert for each battle, no matter how minor. There doesn’t appear to be fewer battles in this mode either. It’s also possible that, since the Pillars games meant to emulate the tradition of the Infinity Engine games, there’s an unpredictable element when you put a turn-based mode on top of it. It will take time to adjust, and some balancing patches will most likely be necessary.

My main gripe so far is that, since the movement system isn’t based on tiles, character positioning can look very awkward. Sometimes when you move a character, he/she pushes other characters to the side, making them slide out of the way. It just looks like they didn’t design the animation system for this, and it might need some tweaks. This also happens in real-time mode, but you don’t see it as much because in the fray of combat the characters tend to move a lot more as they tackle different enemies. Either way, it will take some getting used to, or a movement animation patch to make it look more natural.

It’s hard to say how the turn-based system differs in technical terms. You would have to replay the full game in both modes, paying attention to the stats and the combat log. Then you might be able to draw a conclusion as to which is better or more balanced. Or we could accept that it depends on personal preferences and that each system has its own strengths and weaknesses. What I can say is that it doesn’t feel like they just slapped it together and tacked it on top of the real-time mode.

As I fired up Deadfire to try out the turn-based mode I didn’t expect it would pull me in again, as it’s been less than a year since I played it for the review. It was surprising to find myself hankering to play one quest after another, and really enjoying it. Maybe not more than I enjoyed my first playthrough, but probably just about as much. This is the baseline to gauge how compelling and successful this mode can be in the long-term. I don’t know that it’s enough to attract a new playerbase, but it’s definitely enough to retain the current one, giving us a new combat experience.​

Although it sounds like it's already quite playable, the turn-based mode will initially be considered a beta. I imagine the plan is to finalize it for the game's console release later this year.
 
Self-Ejected

Safav Hamon

Self-Ejected
Village Idiot The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
2,141
Movement is handled in in-game meters, with every character being able to move exactly 10.2 meters. There is currently no menu option to change it. Even if you run out of meters you can still execute an action. A melee attack requires close engagement with an enemy, obviously.


This can't be right. Movement should be based on stride.

You can also inflict stealth attacks in real-time right before you go into turn-based combat mode.

Hopefully other party members will remain in stealth after combat begins like in RTwP mode.
 
Last edited:
Self-Ejected

Safav Hamon

Self-Ejected
Village Idiot The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
2,141
You can only do one Standard or Cast action per turn, alongside your movement. Clearly, you execute Standard actions instantly. Cast actions, you guessed it, involve spellcasting, and take up two turns.​

This can't be right either, and contradicts what was in the leaked version. Different spells should have different cast times.​
 

Kruno

Arcane
Patron
Village Idiot Zionist Agent Shitposter
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
11,478
You can also inflict stealth attacks in real-time right before you go into turn-based combat mode.
Looks like I will be able to fire off those fireballs on groups of small enemies and quickly finish them off in TB mode.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
246
Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign
Stamping a combat system on a game that was designed from the very beginning for a wholly different combat system? What could go wrong?

But hey, I'm not complaining here.

PoE is now turn-based.

As all games should be.
 

Deleted Member 16721

Guest
Brilliant move. Come to think of it, even though I love RTwP combat, turn-based would be great for games with a lot of spells and active abilities, like Kingmaker. Owlcats, let's get on that turn-based mode for Kangmaker, please! :)
 
Self-Ejected

Safav Hamon

Self-Ejected
Village Idiot The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
2,141
That would be great, but Owlcats lead developer hates turn based combat.

Turn-based battles are attention hogs. It takes a lot of time to finish one and there are many battles to be fought. Since they take up so much time and attention, these battles have to be different and unique, and that makes the game too combat-oriented for our taste.

For Pathfinder: Kingmaker, we wanted a classical RPG experience where your experience is varied – an experience where you go from fighting a couple of easy battles to talking to an NPC, to exploring an area to find an entrance to the cave, fighting through a couple of challenging fights to the boss, obtaining interesting loot, and so on as you continue adventuring. For this experience to work, the easy battles have to be quick, and that makes real-time a better pick. On the plus side, these battles are also more visceral and provide a better feeling of the confrontation.

He used the infamous "turn based is bad because of trash mobs" argument.
 
Last edited:

purpleblob

Savant
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
564
Location
Sydney
Both Kingmaker and PoE2 were developed with RTwP combat in mind, simply giving it a TB option is not going to make the combat better - the devs would have to go through significant re-work on encounter design which most of people don't seem to get.
 

Drowed

Arcane
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
1,676
Location
Core City
That would be great, but Owlcats lead developer hates turn based combat.

Turn-based battles are attention hogs. It takes a lot of time to finish one and there are many battles to be fought. Since they take up so much time and attention, these battles have to be different and unique, and that makes the game too combat-oriented for our taste.

For Pathfinder: Kingmaker, we wanted a classical RPG experience where your experience is varied – an experience where you go from fighting a couple of easy battles to talking to an NPC, to exploring an area to find an entrance to the cave, fighting through a couple of challenging fights to the boss, obtaining interesting loot, and so on as you continue adventuring. For this experience to work, the easy battles have to be quick, and that makes real-time a better pick. On the plus side, these battles are also more visceral and provide a better feeling of the confrontation.

He used the infamous "turn based is bad because of trash mobs" argument.

It's more like, "turn-based is bad because he wants to use trash mobs" in the game, because this offers... Variety, I guess?
 

purpleblob

Savant
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
564
Location
Sydney
It also simulates things like troll invasion a lot better imo than just throwing in just a couple of trolls to depict that.
 
Self-Ejected

Safav Hamon

Self-Ejected
Village Idiot The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
2,141
That would be great, but Owlcats lead developer hates turn based combat.

Turn-based battles are attention hogs. It takes a lot of time to finish one and there are many battles to be fought. Since they take up so much time and attention, these battles have to be different and unique, and that makes the game too combat-oriented for our taste.

He used the infamous "turn based is bad because of trash mobs" argument.

It's more like, "turn-based is bad because he wants to use trash mobs" in the game, because this offers... Variety, I guess?

He's saying that designing good encounters is too much work and RTwP let's them get away with cutting corners
 
Last edited:
Self-Ejected

Safav Hamon

Self-Ejected
Village Idiot The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 15, 2018
Messages
2,141
449715578.jpg


12883.jpg


800px-Deadfire_seekerslayersurvivor_screenshot_firetitan.jpg



1542125719_belranga.jpg


PE2_Kraken_2.png


PE2_Nemnok_the_Devourer.png



PE2_Engwithan_Titan.png


PE2_Soul_Collector.png


662px-20180703154241_1.jpg


326px-20180925174846_1.jpg


h4x7BaQ.jpg


pillars20220bird20dragon.png


hqdefault.jpg




ss_e44c08bd6c595ca5c3e92948ab925859032cb65f.600x338.jpg




662px-20181217140047_1.jpg
 

Cyberpink2069

Literate
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
9
Are they planning an expansion? Why would they give this game some love if they didn't?
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom