actually its clearly the Fallout 5 where todd repents and returns to turn based combat and in depth rpg mechanicsNah, it’s more like Fallout 4 for me — getting away too far from the Bethesda’s magnum opus.
For me, it's the same as it was with Fallout 3. The new studio takes over and does it its own way, changing the formula.
consolization has come to mean turn based mechanics. codexers will never recover from this psychic damageFor me, it's the same as it was with Fallout 3. The new studio takes over and does it its own way, changing the formula.
The same as turning an isometric RPG into an FPS? This thread. smh
In before people start crying that Bethesda is adding skills to their games.consolization has come to mean turn based mechanics. codexers will never recover from this psychic damage
consolization has come to mean turn based mechanics. codexers will never recover from this psychic damageFor me, it's the same as it was with Fallout 3. The new studio takes over and does it its own way, changing the formula.
The same as turning an isometric RPG into an FPS? This thread. smh
In before people start crying that Bethesda is adding skills to their games.consolization has come to mean turn based mechanics. codexers will never recover from this psychic damage
Also Baldur's Gate was never deep or beautiful. It was a fun fantasy adventure for teens in the 90s. It's not the 90s anymore and that style does not have the appeal for today's youth, much like how the 60s looked terribly old-fashioned to kids of the 90s.
I didn't realize that you were praising Fallout 3, an objectively awful game and definitely ruined compared to Fallout 1 & 2.Oh right, I've forgot that changing formula = ruining something. What a great thought. Noted!
Dear Non-Edgy Gamer, to say that a change has taken place is not to praise it (also, not condemn it).I didn't realize that you were praising Fallout 3, an objectively awful game and definitely ruined compared to Fallout 1 & 2.Oh right, I've forgot that changing formula = ruining something. What a great thought. Noted!
It's not the 90s anymore and that style does not have the appeal for today's youth, much like how the 60s looked terribly old-fashioned to kids of the 90s.Larian has a special place in my hate, just because they make such a mockery of the medium.
You're right, it's aimed at adult gamers.BG3 is obviously not aimed at teens and, no matter what and how much it changes compared to IE iso crpgs, has like zero appeal for that age group, so I'm not sure what the point of that "argument" even is.
This Game may contain content not appropriate for all ages. It contains General Mature Content, and may include Nudity or Sexual Content.
Something that was good in its time will be good forever.
17-19 is still teen.You're right, it's aimed at adult gamers.
Thanks, it is proven now that the game is aimed at the teen and adult gamers. I'd say the emphasis is put more on young adults than for middle (around 40 years old) and old aged ones. It makes sense to me. They want as much as player base as is possible.17-19 is still teen.You're right, it's aimed at adult gamers.![]()
All you need to know:
From the logos, to the music, to the themes and writing... It's like we went from something deep and beautiful to some parody of depth and beauty, except the parody takes itself seriously and can't ever seem to stfu.
I hate many modern RPG studios for the low quality of their product, but Larian has a special place in my hate, just because they make such a mockery of the medium.
This is a poor comparison because the BG3 trailer is not the intro.
Also Baldur's Gate was never deep or beautiful. It was a fun fantasy adventure for teens in the 90s. It's not the 90s anymore and that style does not have the appeal for today's youth, much like how the 60s looked terribly old-fashioned to kids of the 90s.