Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

FriendlyMerchant

Guest
FriendlyMerchant: this game is too sexual
Larian is wasting time by developing child porn, porn cutscenes, and writing cuckoldry when they were never the point of this ruleset. As such the porn is a distraction. The game would've been done already if they weren't trying to mocap michael jackson at neverland ranch. Cutscenes in general are a waste of time anyways. If you want porn, you're better off just getting the free shit on the internet. It's probably better anyways. It's just cringe shit in this game
ubh9qPv.png

Also FriendlyMerchant: I WANT BALLS
If the move is called "Fireball" there needs to be firey balls. Otherwise you might as well just call it explosion. I do want my atomic fireballs.
 

FriendlyMerchant

Guest
itt: codex gets angry at flemish man for being true to source material
It's a laser beam with their resused groundfire effect. How is that true to source material? It's probably going to keep the groundfire retardation in spite of it not being present in source material.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
2,387
Location
Milan, Italy
It’s actually much better now with all the toggles and stuff. Doesn’t seem they plan to abandon it anyway.
I’m pretty much resigned about it at this point. Which doesn’t mean I won’t bitch about it at every chance.

If nothing else I will always pride myself about TAINTING the reputation of their shitty system tying it forever to the term “toilet chain” (which I noticed some people started using even in other places, without needing to be prompted by me about it).
 

FriendlyMerchant

Guest
Well, I'm going keep dumping in this thread. But I'm not going to flush.

Pic related is why Larian shills still defend this trash
4BfgrE6.png
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
2,387
Location
Milan, Italy
The Barbarian in the trailer look like a skinny twig. Unless they will add body sliders.
I don't think they will EVER add "body sliders" nor "face sliders" no matter how people bitch about it, because their tech isn't suited for morphing.
That said, they are supposed to ass ONE type of larger body later on. It should be pretty much the same currently used in game by the druid Halsin, if dataminers are to be trusted (and its female equivalent used by last-patch Karlach).
 

Spectacle

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
8,363
There is one thing I really don't understand about this thread:

Where does the association between chains and toilets come from????
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom