Deleted Member 22431
Guest
The butthurt will be glorious.Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
The butthurt will be glorious.Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
oh well it's actually in the Dungeon master guide page 270.
Side Initiative
Recording initiative for each PC and monster, arranging everyone in the correct order, and remembering where you are in the list can bog the game down. If you want quicker combats, at the risk of those combats becoming unbalanced, try using the side initiative rule.
Under this variant, the players roll a d20 for their initiative as a group, or side. You also roll a d20. Neither roll receives any modifiers. Whoever rolls highest wins initiative. In case of a tie, keep rerolling until the tie is broken.
When it's a side's turn, the members of that side can act in any order they choose. Once everyone on the side has taken a turn, the other side goes. A round ends when both sides have completed their turns.
If more than two sides take part in a battle, each side rolls for initiative. Sides act from the highest roll to lowest. Combat continues in the initiative order until the battle is complete.
This variant encourages teamwork and makes your life as a DM easier, since you can more easily coordinate monsters. On the downside, the side that wins initiative can gang up on enemies and take them out before they have a chance to act.
The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
Ok, now i am properly fucking butthurt.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1086940/discussions/0/1750150007019243913/
These games were not ever praised for there gameplay mechanics they were praised because of the incredibly deep and interesting stories and choices you could make from a role playing perspective.Thats what makes Baldurs Gate, Planescape, Neverwinter, and all these old cRPGs so memorable. The idea that it was the RTwP combat is not only nonsensical but a flat out fabrication created by a bunch of intellectually vapid nerds who refuse to move of from a nostalgic time they hold in high regards.
I don't even want to see Larian's 3D rendition of Minsc.
Characters shouldn't be able to jump around like kangaroos in a middle of a fight.
I think they said the tadpole is enhancing your jumping capabilities just like how it allowed that vampire guy to be out in the sun.
I don't even want to see Larian's 3D rendition of Minsc.
Larian confirmed all companions are romanceable. If Minsc makes it in I expect everyone will hold them to that. Poor boo.
" Bad made realistic graphic"Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
That man has good points.
But it's true tho
My point was that nobody spends a century adventuring. Retcons are possible, but most probably everyone from the original cast is either dead or has moved on to a different occupation.Wasn't there a rumor going about that Larian was going to retcon it as him being petrified for all this time?
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1086940/discussions/0/1750150007023908567/
Characters shouldn't be able to jump around like kangaroos in a middle of a fight.
I think they said the tadpole is enhancing your jumping capabilities just like how it allowed that vampire guy to be out in the sun.
Looks like we are witnessing birth of a new rpg meme - "tadpole did it"
Disgusting pedophilesShit, I despised that game so much that I cant remember anything.D:OS1 is per-unit, not team-based. It still has the same issue because you could stack it to effectively go first every fight.
But if that's the case, why would they go for a "party initiative" in BG3?
They are after the "very young children" and "completely brain-dead" demographics.
Being ugly is their racial feature, so I don't see a problem. Humans look fine." Bad made realistic graphic"Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
That man has good points.
But it's true tho
No, seriously, just look at this. Larians's incompetent art direction was not that big of a problem in DOS's top down view, it actually kinda complemented overall silly tone of those games. But here, in "cinematic" first person, it looks cringy as fuck and has strong uncanny valley vibes. Gives me Oblivion flashbacks.
The only problem is that nostalgia, stupidity and ADHD are a pretty bad mix. History teaches us that this rabid crowd will never get over it. They're going to whine everywhere endlessly, start idiotic petitions, tank Metacritic ratings, etc.The butthurt will be glorious.
Something like Divinity: Original Sin 3, which it actually is?Poor Larian. Maybe they should've called the games something else
I am gonna cum
When I play IWD and IWD2 I can hear the music even if it's turned off.It's a pre-alpha, dude.
As to music, I always turn it off. The only exception was Shadowrun Dragonfall.
When WotC gives you the rights to D&D you don't get to take all the decisionsThe only problem is that nostalgia, stupidity and ADHD are a pretty bad mix. History teaches us that this rabid crowd will never get over it. They're going to while everywhere endlessly, start idiotic petitions, tank Metacritic ratings, etc.The butthurt will be glorious.
Poor Larian. Maybe they should've named the game something else - just to shield themselves from this spampede of muppets.
I don't see the problem with those screens other than the dialogue.
Also: [ELF]
Aye, thus it can be inferred that Larian took these rights solely for the brand recognition. From the getgo, they had no intention of making it into anything other than a D:OS sequel.When WotC gives you the rights to D&D you don't get to take all the decisionsThe only problem is that nostalgia, stupidity and ADHD are a pretty bad mix. History teaches us that this rabid crowd will never get over it. They're going to while everywhere endlessly, start idiotic petitions, tank Metacritic ratings, etc.The butthurt will be glorious.
Poor Larian. Maybe they should've named the game something else - just to shield themselves from this spampede of muppets.
Being ugly is their racial feature, so I don't see a problem. Humans look fine." Bad made realistic graphic"Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
That man has good points.
But it's true tho
No, seriously, just look at this. Larians's incompetent art direction was not that big of a problem in DOS's top down view, it actually kinda complemented overall silly tone of those games. But here, in "cinematic" first person, it looks cringy as fuck and has strong uncanny valley vibes. Gives me Oblivion flashbacks.
Dude, you're trying to grasp at straws but there are no straws to grasp. As someone who's never quite forgiven CDPR for TW3 graphics downgrade, I tell you this: there's absolutely nothing wrong with the BG3 visuals even in the current pre-alpha state.
It's literally the face that never remembered.
Absolutely nothing wrong? I don't see 2d pre-rendered hand-touched backgrounds, so it's all wrongDude, you're trying to grasp at straws but there are no straws to grasp. As someone who's never quite forgiven CDPR for TW3 graphics downgrade I tell you this: there's absolutely nothing wrong with the BG3 visuals even in the current pre-alpha state.
It's literally the face that never remembered.