Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Pre-Release Thread [EARLY ACCESS RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

Deleted Member 22431

Guest
The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).
C0tK5He.png


3V0m83n.png


1dMVQ1s.png
The butthurt will be glorious.
 

Riddler

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
2,394
Bubbles In Memoria
oh well it's actually in the Dungeon master guide page 270.
Side Initiative

Recording initiative for each PC and monster, arranging everyone in the correct order, and remembering where you are in the list can bog the game down. If you want quicker combats, at the risk of those combats becoming unbalanced, try using the side initiative rule.
Under this variant, the players roll a d20 for their initiative as a group, or side. You also roll a d20. Neither roll receives any modifiers. Whoever rolls highest wins initiative. In case of a tie, keep rerolling until the tie is broken.
When it's a side's turn, the members of that side can act in any order they choose. Once everyone on the side has taken a turn, the other side goes. A round ends when both sides have completed their turns.
If more than two sides take part in a battle, each side rolls for initiative. Sides act from the highest roll to lowest. Combat continues in the initiative order until the battle is complete.
This variant encourages teamwork and makes your life as a DM easier, since you can more easily coordinate monsters. On the downside, the side that wins initiative can gang up on enemies and take them out before they have a chance to act.

So we solve an issue that no-one had (in crpgs) in a way that destroys the balance for anyone not terminally retarded? Where have we seen something like this before? Oh that's right, in Larian previous game with their armour system!

Say what you will but Larian but they seem determined to stay on brand not only in the "humour" department.
 

Dramart

Learned
Joined
Nov 28, 2019
Messages
540
Location
Argentina
The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn

Ok, now i am properly fucking butthurt. :rage:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/1086940/discussions/0/1750150007019243913/

These games were not ever praised for there gameplay mechanics they were praised because of the incredibly deep and interesting stories and choices you could make from a role playing perspective.Thats what makes Baldurs Gate, Planescape, Neverwinter, and all these old cRPGs so memorable. The idea that it was the RTwP combat is not only nonsensical but a flat out fabrication created by a bunch of intellectually vapid nerds who refuse to move of from a nostalgic time they hold in high regards.

A lot of people is triggered. That nerd calling others nerds. This is a war of nerds, rpg nerds.
 

Hamster

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
5,936
Location
Moscow
Codex 2012 Grab the Codex by the pussy Codex USB, 2014
The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).

3V0m83n.png

That man has good points.
" Bad made realistic graphic"

But it's true tho

No, seriously, just look at this. Larians's incompetent art direction was not that big of a problem in DOS's top down view, it actually kinda complemented overall silly tone of those games. But here, in "cinematic" first person, it looks cringy as fuck and has strong uncanny valley vibes. Gives me Oblivion flashbacks.

PM2ysZc.jpg


drYBkxb.jpg
 

rhollis

Educated
Patron
Joined
Jun 25, 2019
Messages
78
Wasn't there a rumor going about that Larian was going to retcon it as him being petrified for all this time?
My point was that nobody spends a century adventuring. Retcons are possible, but most probably everyone from the original cast is either dead or has moved on to a different occupation.

Any companions belonging to long-lived races (e.g., Aerie) could be around and doing their own thing. You could round them up like a heist movie montage and convince them to join you. It would be corny as hell but not sure why that would stop Larian.
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,819
Location
Ingrija
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1086940/discussions/0/1750150007023908567/

Characters shouldn't be able to jump around like kangaroos in a middle of a fight.

I think they said the tadpole is enhancing your jumping capabilities just like how it allowed that vampire guy to be out in the sun.

Looks like we are witnessing birth of a new rpg meme - "tadpole did it"

What a convenient premise, allowing to handwave any retarded shit developers come up with in order to impress plebs.

Too bad it stays retarded nonetheless.
 

NJClaw

OoOoOoOoOoh
Patron
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
7,620
Location
Pronouns: rusts/rusty
Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
387
I like what we are getting. I love Larian, Baldur's Gate, D&D and Turn-based combat. I like that devs are making their own story, instead of feeding off of nostalgia like Star Wars and most modern remake culture. Combat looks fun and faithful to the ruleset, without forgetting that it's not a tabletop game. Story set-up sounds interesting and companions don't make me want to kill them outright(except that dirty bloodsucker). Cinematics look junky but that will be fixed.
Overly bright visuals and quantity/quality of humor is my only concern.
I have confidence that this will turn out to be, at least, a very fun time. Larian seem to care about making a good game instead of shitting trash out and profiting off of it's name like Dungeon Siege 3, DA:I or Andromeda.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Messages
387
The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).

3V0m83n.png

That man has good points.
" Bad made realistic graphic"

But it's true tho

No, seriously, just look at this. Larians's incompetent art direction was not that big of a problem in DOS's top down view, it actually kinda complemented overall silly tone of those games. But here, in "cinematic" first person, it looks cringy as fuck and has strong uncanny valley vibes. Gives me Oblivion flashbacks.

PM2ysZc.jpg


drYBkxb.jpg
Being ugly is their racial feature, so I don't see a problem. Humans look fine.
 

prodigydancer

Arcane
In My Safe Space
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
1,399
The butthurt will be glorious.
The only problem is that nostalgia, stupidity and ADHD are a pretty bad mix. History teaches us that this rabid crowd will never get over it. They're going to whine everywhere endlessly, start idiotic petitions, tank Metacritic ratings, etc.

Poor Larian. Maybe they should've named the game something else - just to shield themselves from this spampede of muppets.
 
Last edited:

NJClaw

OoOoOoOoOoh
Patron
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
7,620
Location
Pronouns: rusts/rusty
Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture
The butthurt will be glorious.
The only problem is that nostalgia, stupidity and ADHD are a pretty bad mix. History teaches us that this rabid crowd will never get over it. They're going to while everywhere endlessly, start idiotic petitions, tank Metacritic ratings, etc.

Poor Larian. Maybe they should've named the game something else - just to shield themselves from this spampede of muppets.
When WotC gives you the rights to D&D you don't get to take all the decisions
 

Hamster

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
5,936
Location
Moscow
Codex 2012 Grab the Codex by the pussy Codex USB, 2014
I don't see the problem with those screens other than the dialogue.
Also: [ELF]

Don't get me started on the fucking dialogue. :argh:At least with visuals it's entirely possible that derpy art direction will turn out to not be a problem. It happened to me with Nier: Automata, it looked like absolute cringe, but it started making a perverse kind of sense a few hours into the game.
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
19,826
The butthurt will be glorious.
The only problem is that nostalgia, stupidity and ADHD are a pretty bad mix. History teaches us that this rabid crowd will never get over it. They're going to while everywhere endlessly, start idiotic petitions, tank Metacritic ratings, etc.

Poor Larian. Maybe they should've named the game something else - just to shield themselves from this spampede of muppets.
When WotC gives you the rights to D&D you don't get to take all the decisions
Aye, thus it can be inferred that Larian took these rights solely for the brand recognition. From the getgo, they had no intention of making it into anything other than a D:OS sequel.
 

Hamster

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
5,936
Location
Moscow
Codex 2012 Grab the Codex by the pussy Codex USB, 2014
The ongoing meltdown on the Steam BG3 forums is hilarious. /popcorn
Not sure if trolling or brain damage (although it's Steamcommunity, so probably both).

3V0m83n.png

That man has good points.
" Bad made realistic graphic"

But it's true tho

No, seriously, just look at this. Larians's incompetent art direction was not that big of a problem in DOS's top down view, it actually kinda complemented overall silly tone of those games. But here, in "cinematic" first person, it looks cringy as fuck and has strong uncanny valley vibes. Gives me Oblivion flashbacks.

PM2ysZc.jpg


drYBkxb.jpg
Being ugly is their racial feature, so I don't see a problem. Humans look fine.

Bruh.

baldurs_gate_3_23-1152x648.jpg


It's literally the face that never remembered.
 

prodigydancer

Arcane
In My Safe Space
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
1,399
baldurs_gate_3_23-1152x648.jpg


It's literally the face that never remembered.
Dude, you're trying to grasp at straws but there are no straws to grasp. As someone who's never quite forgiven CDPR for TW3 graphics downgrade, I tell you this: there's absolutely nothing wrong with the BG3 visuals even in the current pre-alpha state.
 

NJClaw

OoOoOoOoOoh
Patron
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
7,620
Location
Pronouns: rusts/rusty
Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture
baldurs_gate_3_23-1152x648.jpg


It's literally the face that never remembered.
Dude, you're trying to grasp at straws but there are no straws to grasp. As someone who's never quite forgiven CDPR for TW3 graphics downgrade I tell you this: there's absolutely nothing wrong with the BG3 visuals even in the current pre-alpha state.
Absolutely nothing wrong? I don't see 2d pre-rendered hand-touched backgrounds, so it's all wrong
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom