I love BG1 and 2 as much as anyone else, but this obsessive hatred for the “marring” of the series is pathetically retarded.
Even if BG3 was TERRIBLE, it wouldn’t change anything about BG 1 and 2.
It’s sort of like the Star Wars sequels. In my opinion, they are absolutely awful movies. Massive shits on the established characters and lore. Does that ruin all of Star Wars? No. They’re just bad movies.
So if BG3 were bad, it doesn’t take away from BG1&2. Another example is Ultima IX. I have never seen anyone praise that game, and yet somehow Ultima is still regarded as one of the greatest role-playing game series of all time.
If you are a soulless consumer faggot, yes.
Not sure what consuming has to do with what I said.
If you don't like the direction that BG3 is taking, don't play it. No matter what it is, it cannot ruin BG 1 and 2.
Lel, since so many Larian-faggots seem to be incapable to comprehend what I'm saying and are downvoting me, let me try to explain even to the dumbest retard:
If I were to invent and sell something under a certain name, be it something intellectual like a crime story, a script for a movie, a sepcial kind of furniture or anything else, would it be ok for anyone owning the rights to just sell _anything_ under the same label, even if it was _nothing_ like the original product?
Imagine yourself in the inventor's position. Do you not care at all what the next thing labelled with the name you've given your invention would be? Something completetly contradicting your original idea?
Well, I guess not. But then you're a retarded cons00mer or brainwashed beyoned anything that'd be worth to be called a human being.