Yeah... I don't even think bolt-action rifles will be standard equipment.
this is going to be arcadey run and gun killstreak onl1n3 gaym yes?
Battlefield doesn't have kill steaks but from what I've seen of insurgency, I doubt this game will be as slow or realistic as insurgency.this is going to be arcadey run and gun killstreak onl1n3 gaym yes?
not slower paced? e.g. insurgency
Concept art:
http://imgur.com/a/Qhm25
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/battlefield-1-ea-was-concerned-kids-didnt-know-ww1/1100-6440385/
Battlefield 1: EA Was Concerned Kids Didn't Know WW1 Even Happened
There was "some debate" internally about Battlefield 1's World War 1 setting.
Following last month's news that EA Studios boss Patrick Soderlund initially rejected DICE's pitch for Battlefield 1, EA CFO Blake Jorgensen said today that there were concerns the company's younger audience didn't even know World War 1 happened.
Speaking at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2016 Global Technology Conference, Jorgensen said there was "some debate" inside of EA about Battlefield 1's setting.
"World War 1, we were worried that many of the younger consumers out there didn't know that there was a World War 2 or Vietnam, so World War 1..." he said.
One of the reasons why Soderlund originally rejected DICE's Battlefield 1 pitch was because he thought trench warfare couldn't be fun. But World War 1 offered much more than that, and once developers presented these ideas to EA, the project got the green light.
"I think what people don't understand about World War 1 is the technology shift that went on during the war," Jorgensen said. "People started the war on horseback and ended the war with airplanes and tanks and battleships and submarines. And that's a huge opportunity for us to be able to do a video game around."
Jorgensen also mentioned that there is a huge geographic opportunity for Battlefield 1's content, since World War 1 took place across all of Europe and northern Africa.
It appears people are indeed interested in a World War 1 Battlefield game. The game's announcement trailer is now the most-liked trailer for anything on YouTube. Jorgensen said this speaks to the "excitement" that exists around the game, even if it might not necessarily be indicative of future sales.
On the one hand, I'm kinda averse to glorifying WWI as something 'fun', since as a New Zealander I've been beaten over the head with how awful and wasteful the first world war, and the Gallipoli campaign in particular, was.
The whole idea of producing games for children on times that made grown men go insane is weird
I dunno, maybe I'm just averse to them presenting the horrors and tribulations of the first world war to dubstep.
Like I said, I'm inherently biased towards the subject because WWI is still very much a sore point in New Zealand public conscience, unlike in places like the United States where it's mostly passed over in favour of discussing WWII.
(even though my view of the events of WWII as something that 'fun' can be derived from has dimmed as I've gotten older and began reading more in to subjects like the Pacific campaign and the Great Patriotic War)
People's perception of WWI is too colored by pacifist authors with no front line experience.
That, and the screaming.Edit: The only game that handles the Eastern Front well is Red Orchestra because the gameplay with its one shot one kills does its best to emulate being scared of war and dying mercilessly when you find yourself trying to hide wishing you could get even one kill before someone spots you and downs you.