Sam Ecorners
Arcane
I was hoping they'd do the risky thing and make Battlefield 1 a real First World War game
Ok, skipping over everything else, I want to ask about this. Why? Why would anyone hope that EA's Battlefield game would be anything more than an arcady shoot shoot? It's the same as expecting Bethesda to develop a good RPG, or of Bioware to have good writing.
Because it is possible for a big nasty company to get a developer to make something good.
Bethesda, for all we hate them, did it with Dishonored and Wolfenstein: The New Order.
Sony did it with Uncharted and The Last of Us.
Why isn't it possible for EA to get someone to make a great WW1 game?
EA could get someone to make a good WW1 game, but it's not going to be DICE and it's not going to be a Battlefield game. I'm talking about established developers, making games they are known for, and players thinking that a new title in an established series can be drastically different from established patterns.
Dishonored was made by Arkane, Wolfenstein -- by, essentially, Starbreeze and Naughty Dog has been at the forefront of well done cinematic console popamole for years. So, personally, I see nothing surprising with these games. Look all I'm saying is, frame your expectations according to the developers. DICE are not ones to make a realistic shooter. They make fun arcady team based shooters, and this time they managed to make a good, cinematic popamolish SP experience.