Wirdschowerdn
Ph.D. in World Saving
WAB steaming off on "box-ticking diversity."
It's customary for Battlefield's campaigns to magnify the myriad flaws of CoD campaigns.
Now that CoD doesn't even have a campaign I shudder to think how bad it'll be.
Are you implying in any way or form that they aren't? Haven't you seen the world cup? France is one of the most ancient black african countries in Europa!
nvestigations include:
- What type of disruptive behavior do we see in Battlefield today?
- What drives or triggers people to disrupt other players games?
- How can we prevent disruptive behavior in our titles and community?
- What are some experiments we could conduct to measure benefits of punishing bad or rewarding good behavior?
I watch only the user score,don't care about the shill one.BFV is shit and all but taking Metacritic seriously is kind of a joke to begin with.
Come on,show me game where the user score is not accurate. People get emotional over good and bad games,not over some mediocre nohype games.User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
How can I know where is the user score more "accurate"? Is there some other knowledge base to compare with? I'm only saying that metacritic user score is simply the depiction of the emotional reaction of people on games, not necessarily representing the actual quality of the game it selfCome on,show me game where the user score is not accurate. People get emotional over good and bad games,not over some mediocre nohype games.User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/hitman-absolutionCome on,show me game where the user score is not accurate. People get emotional over good and bad games,not over some mediocre nohype games.User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
Yeah no shit, but any game that has a negative popular opinion will be bombed with 0s by people who have never played the game to begin with meaning the entire thing is pointless.I watch only the user score,don't care about the shill one.
https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivionCome on,show me game where the user score is not accurate. People get emotional over good and bad games,not over some mediocre nohype games.User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/hitman-absolutionCome on,show me game where the user score is not accurate. People get emotional over good and bad games,not over some mediocre nohype games.User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/dragon-age-inquisition
So you have played all the games you have criticized?Yeah no shit, but any game that has a negative popular opinion will be bombed with 0s by people who have never played the game to begin with meaning the entire thing is pointless.I watch only the user score,don't care about the shill one.
Nothing wrong with review bombing,if the customers are pissed they bomb it,don't be a corporate shill. In the end i am old enough to be able to read past the bullshit whine and decipher the real problems by reading a few user reviews.Plus lets not forget the amazing art of "review bombing" for whatever reason that happens in each separate case
Can you put even less effort in your next post?https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/the-elder-scrolls-iv-oblivionCome on,show me game where the user score is not accurate. People get emotional over good and bad games,not over some mediocre nohype games.User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
yeah, fuck offCan you put even less effort in your next post?
I can call Overwatch poorly designed and balanced hero shooter shit, but I won't go on Metacritic to rate it as something I have played, because I have not. If BFV was on Steam and there was a baseline to entry because you have to buy and play games to review them on Steam, I believe it would have mixed or mostly positive reviews.So you have played all the games you have criticized?
I disagree with you darling,it is higher effort than the last one .yeah, fuck offCan you put even less effort in your next post?
Physically i agree,mentally...not really. I was literally thinking while writing the post that some retard will bring up some dead horse like oblivion or fallout3.Technically, googling Metacritic, looking up Oblivion, then copypasting the link requires more steps than typing words.
Plus lets not forget the amazing art of "review bombing" for whatever reason that happens in each separate case
your problem is using the console examples when we know the popamolers gonna popamole. DA:I in its PC version has a 59 user score (Hitman only goes down by 0.4 compared to PS3)https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/hitman-absolutionCome on,show me game where the user score is not accurate. People get emotional over good and bad games,not over some mediocre nohype games.User scores are also very "emotional" and not reliable. People vote either 0 or 10 and a lot vote without even having played the game.
Not talking about BFV specifically of course
https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/dragon-age-inquisition