The DOSBox version has audio issues and hero movement is oddly choppy, do you know if the Windows version suffers from the same problems?Yes. But I guess you can get the Windows version to both work and with correct aspect ratio if you use a wrapper like DgVoodoo or something.
The DOSBox version has audio issues and hero movement is oddly choppy, do you know if the Windows version suffers from the same problems?Yes. But I guess you can get the Windows version to both work and with correct aspect ratio if you use a wrapper like DgVoodoo or something.
Then is this my problem? HoMM1+2 were great. But I cannot play HoMM3 campaign. It is so boring..I tried so 5 times during 25 years.
None of the HoMM3 campaigns are really good, unlike the HoMM2 campaigns.
I did play through the Homm3 campaign but yeah, it doesn't hold a candle to Homm2.Then is this my problem? HoMM1+2 were great. But I cannot play HoMM3 campaign. It is so boring..I tried so 5 times during 25 years.
None of the HoMM3 campaigns are really good, unlike the HoMM2 campaigns.
You can probably win with only one, but it's much more convenient with more. Some for exploring, some for bringing fresh troops to the front, one as a squire to your main (flag unprotected sites, hold troops that don't fit your main army and such).Do I need more heroes or one is enough?
I did play through the Homm3 campaign but yeah, it doesn't hold a candle to Homm2.
In general I feel Homm3 is overrated. Perhaps not within the Homm franchise (although I still like Homm2 a bit more) but within the broader strategy/tactical genre it's definitely not the best thing since the sliced bread. I had way more fun with Disciples 2, AoW 2/3, King's Bounty, MoM.
Arma?Regarding HoMM3 campaigns - I didn't really spend a lot of time on them, but main thing to know is that the ones from Arma are a yuge improvement. Vanilla ones are very uneven and particularly the map design in them is utterly dogshit at times.