-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Company News Bethesda vs Interplay in the court of William M Nickerson
- Thread starter DarkUnderlord
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 15,003
We hear you, what was it this time?
They deleted my posts from Beth forum because I said that I talked to an Interplay insider and he said that Bethesda never intended to approve anything for Interplay.
I replied with
and then I was banned for 10 days for publicly disagreeing with the moderator.
I replied with
and then I was banned for 10 days for publicly disagreeing with the moderator.
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 15,003
Same old shit.
Vaarna_Aarne
Notorious Internet Vandal
R00fles.
Luzur
Good Sir
Ausir said:
hahah.
:monocle:
Secretninja
Cipher
Ausir said:
Pliskin
Arbiter
Ausir said:
Please report to the nearest Bethesduh Reeducation Station.
Remember: Ignorance is Strength!
Xi
Arcane
Do we judge the situation, or the internal disposition of the company in this case? I want to believe we should judge the companies' disposition, but I know this is hardly the case. Fucking apes banging their chest in the jungle. That's the situation, and it's not that they're inherently apes, even though they are, rather it's because they're in a fucking jungle. God damn the legal jungle. It's a zoo without cages!
Section8
Cipher
RaXz said:
Xi said:
Shannow
Waster of Time
Who didn't see this comming when Beth/Zenimax and Hearve set up that stupid contract of theirs?
Wow. they must have the worst qualified moderators ever on their forums 
poocolator
Erudite
Their moderators are perfectly qualified for their own forums. Bethesda only demands absolute obedience and fanatical worship, not intelligence or anything of the sort, from their moderators. By any other forum standards, those creeps would be kicked and banned for being morons. What can you expect, besides a banning, when a codexer goes over there for discussion? Certainly not that. (Unless you enjoy discussing mods that change the colour of BethDogmeat's ball sack.)
Luzur
Good Sir
thesheeep said:Wow. they must have the worst qualified moderators ever on their forums
yeah, but they are good at slurping the dev dongles, especially princess_stomper.
MetalCraze
Arcane
Well Ausir kinda localizes their games for them so that means they have his soul anyway.
Pliskin
Arbiter
Tails said:
I saw someone banned for pointing out that Fawkes was a female.
Still don't understand the reasoning behind that one --- except maybe it upset the kiddies, or sumfink.
Luzur
Good Sir
Pliskin said:Tails said:
I saw someone banned for pointing out that Fawkes was a female.
Still don't understand the reasoning behind that one --- except maybe it upset the kiddies, or sumfink.
could have been about the information ruining the circlejerk the kids where doing since girls could give them cooties.
Looks like Shacknews has some quotes from the actual court filing:
http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/60435
http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/60435
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.