Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

From Software Bloodborne. Discuss or die!

Ravielsk

Magister
Joined
Feb 20, 2021
Messages
1,820
I can't agree with this. Yes, there are some iterative improvements, but all of Souls games have their own unique components that simply do not exist in other games. I played Demon's Souls way after Bloodborne and Dark Souls 3 and it still captivated me. A buddy of mine played Bloodborne after Elden Ring and couldn't shut up about the game for two months.
Yes, and? I am not arguing that going out of order is somehow 100% going to ruin your experience. Only that in general its not recommended.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom