evdk
comrade troglodyte :M
Good that DF graciously allows people shit they a) can't prohibit and b) can't enforce. Tim is my hero.sharing your impressions on unofficial sites (like the Codex) is allowed according to the latest update.
Good that DF graciously allows people shit they a) can't prohibit and b) can't enforce. Tim is my hero.sharing your impressions on unofficial sites (like the Codex) is allowed according to the latest update.
Bullshit. Those games are simply that good, there's no nostalgia involved. Last year I replayed DoTT, Grim Fandango and Monkey Island 1 & 2, and they all are absolutely brilliant.
DoTT was even better than I remenbered.
Why are you so passive agressive? Did Tim touch you somewhere? They didn't use the term "allow". They asked, and said please.Good that DF graciously allows people shit they a) can't prohibit and b) can't enforce. Tim is my hero.sharing your impressions on unofficial sites (like the Codex) is allowed according to the latest update.
We will see how the pudding tastes in a few hours.As someone said, a lot of people expected Tim Schaefer to make a game like he used to - DoTT, SMI, Full Throttle - and while in a similar vein, it's not exactly that. Which, now, I can say is okay - he's doing a combination of what he wants and what will have the most likelihood of wider appeal and thus great financial success for DoubleFine. I suppose it's up to other people to fill that niche, the old school scratch, that needs to be filled. Which is odd, cause I know a couple of people doin' that...
I will be interested to see what Broken Age looks, feels and plays like. At this time, almost two years later, it's been a lot of speculation, debates, arguments, and outright guessing as to what it'll be... and I'm tired of pontificating (myself, anyone else is free to do so, of course!) and now I want to see if the proof is in the pudding, as they say.
Bt
You're not really helping your case because DoTT looked like a Saturday Morning Cartoon. It was probably the most childish looking adventure game Lucas Arts made.Bullshit. Those games are simply that good, there's no nostalgia involved. Last year I replayed DoTT, Grim Fandango and Monkey Island 1 & 2, and they all are absolutely brilliant.
DoTT was even better than I remenbered.
It won't have as difficult puzzles as you mentioned that's for sure. But I hope it will be challenging enough.At this point, I'm just interested to know how the puzzles are. There is a fucking infuriating trend on last years, even on german adventure games, of making puzzles almost solve themselves. I used to be stuck for a long time trying to figuring out what to do, nowdays it's very rare for a puzzle to give you a challenge and based on the little I experienced of Double Fine forums, most people that backed this game are casuals LARPING being "hardcore". We will see if Tim managed to put some intelligent design on his puzzles because based on most of his backers, he can make an interactive book with no puzzles in it and they would be fine with it.
Backers working at review sites and running blogs are under embargo, sharing your impressions on unofficial sites (like the Codex) is allowed according to the latest update. They just ask to be sensitive about spoilers.I've read that there is an embargo on backers posting their impressions of the early copies they get until the date the official review embargo for magazines and sites is up. Not sure how ethical that is.
You have to sign a contract to get the early copy. That contract says you can't discuss it until a certain date.How on earth can they legally enforce this embargo ? Isn't there such a thing called Freedom of the press ? Whatever this is, they are not in a buisness relationship with Double Fine. Double Fine can't fire bloggers, and I strongly doubt they can sue them.
Yes, I am perfectly aware that this applies to all games NDA.
You have to sign a contract to get the early copy. That contract says you can't discuss it until a certain date.How on earth can they legally enforce this embargo ? Isn't there such a thing called Freedom of the press ? Whatever this is, they are not in a buisness relationship with Double Fine. Double Fine can't fire bloggers, and I strongly doubt they can sue them.
Yes, I am perfectly aware that this applies to all games NDA.
If you breach the contract, Double Fine can assuredly sue you.
NDAs have decades of precedents, so I'm going to assume they know what they're doing. You also conveniently ignored the rest of my response.Not all contract clauses are exactly legal, especially depending on the country you are in. They might sue a Kwan, but can they sue a European ?
If not, what is the goddamn point ?
This I don't know and it seems like a bad idea. InXile realized that and put no restrictions.But in this case, the backers in general are getting the game. If a backer decides to post his/her impressions on their Facebook or Tumblr before the street review date, how can Doublefine pressure them? They are not professional reviewers, they are just customers who got their product and decided to review it, these are not press copies after all.
I am pretty sure that the decades of precedents are not worth a damn in for example potatoland. And trying to sue someone across borders is pretty much futile.NDAs have decades of precedents, so I'm going to assume they know what they're doing. You also conveniently ignored the rest of my response.Not all contract clauses are exactly legal, especially depending on the country you are in. They might sue a Kwan, but can they sue a European ?
If not, what is the goddamn point ?
It's made pretty clear that posts on facebook/whatever is not what they are talking about.This I don't know and it seems like a bad idea. InXile realized that and put no restrictions.But in this case, the backers in general are getting the game. If a backer decides to post his/her impressions on their Facebook or Tumblr before the street review date, how can Doublefine pressure them? They are not professional reviewers, they are just customers who got their product and decided to review it, these are not press copies after all.
we are requiring all -->formal reviews<-- be held until January 27 at 10am Pacific time (6pm GMT).
They can't actually enforce that, so it's a request.As you know, backers are getting access to Broken Age Act 1 before anyone else, so we request that you be sensitive to spoilers when discussing the game and releasing Let’s Plays and similar game footage.
To that end, we are requesting that any videos you release of the game be cut off after the Sugar Bunting Maiden’s Feast in Vella’s world and upon meeting Marek in Shay’s world.
[You also conveniently ignored the rest of my response.
There are ways to sue Europeans, I'm pretty sure European companies do NDAs.I'm sorry, I didn't realize we were having a fight of some sort.
Also, you didn't answer my question. At all.
There are ways to sue Europeans, I'm pretty sure European companies do NDAs.I'm sorry, I didn't realize we were having a fight of some sort.
Also, you didn't answer my question. At all.
As I said originally, even if you can't sue, the press who leaks their info would get blacklisted and not given any more early information."Pretty sure'" is not an answer when it comes to law.
Enforceable to employees, or people in business relations ? Probably.
Limiting the freedom of the press to customers and random people on the internet who are not in a business relationship? I highly doubt it.