Ol' Willy
Arcane
Shurygina claimed physical violence and actual rape, not revoking of consentYou're from Russland, so aware of Shurygina and some other cases.
Shurygina claimed physical violence and actual rape, not revoking of consentYou're from Russland, so aware of Shurygina and some other cases.
Not wanting a biased (against you) or activist judge presiding your case seems rather obvious. You for instance wouldn't want this judge in charge of your libel suit regarding sexual assault allegations, no?Serious discussions on a judge's political bias on what a case's outcome will be is of concern. Everything in america is like this yes?
Similarly if you're suing a corporation or the government you wouldn't want a corporate cocksucker/lobbyist stooge or or a die-hard apparatchik presiding the case. They may rise over their initial bias given the facts of a case presented and the law, but it's less likely and not a great starting point. It makes sense to try and Min-Max that way if possible.
Irregardless of the verdict his former friends in the Australian games industry have fully turned on him.
Essentially though Chris is fighting for his legacy not so much to return. I think the sentiments even here in Australia would also to some extent apply within the AAA industry internationally as well as its all just a big circle jerk.
I think his working career is over unless he works remotely under alias even if he does win and clears his name.
If he doesn't however clear his name. They'll erase him from history and pretend he never existed. That would be hard to watch your entire lifetime of work be destroyed in an instant.
What's the source of that picture?Not wanting a biased (against you) or activist judge presiding your case seems rather obvious. You for instance wouldn't want this judge in charge of your libel suit regarding sexual assault allegations, no?Serious discussions on a judge's political bias on what a case's outcome will be is of concern. Everything in america is like this yes?
Similarly if you're suing a corporation or the government you wouldn't want a corporate cocksucker/lobbyist stooge or or a die-hard apparatchik presiding the case. They may rise over their initial bias given the facts of a case presented and the law, but it's less likely and not a great starting point. It makes sense to try and Min-Max that way if possible.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...unched-texas-judge-wears-pussy-hat-courtroom/What's the source of that picture?
"The lawyer in the thread is biased, unfortunately," wrote Avellone. "I respect his right to be heard, but while mocking one for pleading 'hurt feelings,' he should already be aware that's standard wording for libel suits in California and includes a range of emotional distress, including suicidal thoughts."
Schmeyer declined to add anything specific to that remark, but did respond to the claim that he is biased. "I don’t know Chris Avellone personally, nor do I know any parties to this lawsuit," wrote the lawyer in an email to PC Gamer. "I've played his games, and enjoyed them, but that's the extent of it. Being a lawyer, I found the legal issues surrounding his complaint to be of interest, and I commented.
Are you just acting like a silly little cunt?Angry men afraid that their right to coerce drunk women into sex without getting called rapists making up an absolute binary state, ignoring the gradient from drunk to incapacitated when even the definition of incapacitation is up for debate in a lot of cases. "Her eyes were open and she was mumbling, and I heard yes".
Law is often very dodgy on these things.
Not as dodgy as your clearly idiotic statements. You said that "drunk people can not give consent" and later doubled down when someone called you out on your clearly retarded statements by calling him a "potential rapist". And you never even brought up the difference between incapacitaded and drunk before the tweet I quoted. It's almost like you don't have the slightest idea of what you're talking about.
You sound like you are... triggered.
Wow, a media outlet who actually contacted Chris for comments, and also that TwitterLayer Schmeyer.
Making you pay for her trip home, the whoreI think the slightly tipsy lass (trying to drag you into a taxi with her at the end of the night) knows exactly what she wants.
It wasn't the first one. There was another article that mentioned contacting Avellone but he didn't reply.Wow, a media outlet who actually contacted Chris for comments, and also that TwitterLayer Schmeyer.
Dude wtf it's barely 30 pagesI just spent like 3+
its a dark day for the industry when really amazing knowledge about designing games and narratives is lost forever because "he did a bad thing once".
Chris did something bad because of vice. He gave into his alcoholism which the industry encourages and enables.
He is not unique in this. I am far more interested in the Ubisoft scandal as that has way more wider reaching issues.
I can only hope that out of all of this the executive culture dies in this industry because that's where a lot of the problem stems from. Chris was encouraged to drink because of that culture.
The social environment of the games industry is entirely the problem here and its something that has to either be changed or outright decimated and started over because its the source of so much wrong with games today and the past even.
Richard Garriott has spoken before about the drug culture the industry had in the 70s and 80s. I hadn't realised how big a problem it was.
Its odd how that isn't the focus, instead the focus is on destroying Chris. We have so many widespread problems and its all getting ignored again.
Look, sexually attractive people don't tend to think that way at all so who the fuck even cares about your/their opinion on this? Come to think of it, danger haired cunts from twitter are basically projecting when screeching "incel! incel! INCEL!!!" all the time.Drunk people can not give consent. Doesn't matter what she thought, said or felt in the moment if she was drunk and if she were, she would have every right to call it whatever she wanted to call it later on, even years later.
And if she were drunk and Chris made a move on her, that is basically sexual assault.
2/10, made me reply.
If you don't agree with this very fundamental principle on consent, you are a potential rapist.
It is not in an ambiguous state where it can be consensual or not-consensual depending on how a person feels about it later.
Look, sexually attractive people don't tend to think that way at all so who the fuck even cares about your/their opinion on this? Come to think of it, danger haired cunts from twitter are basically projecting when screeching "incel! incel! INCEL!!!" all the time.Drunk people can not give consent. Doesn't matter what she thought, said or felt in the moment if she was drunk and if she were, she would have every right to call it whatever she wanted to call it later on, even years later.
And if she were drunk and Chris made a move on her, that is basically sexual assault.
2/10, made me reply.
If you don't agree with this very fundamental principle on consent, you are a potential rapist.
I understood "chingu" and "sexual predator". I resent this video because one of my best friends is Korean but she mispronounces my name in a different way every time she says it. But this bastard actually says "Chris Avellone" properly. Really shows how much a person is worth.
It is not in an ambiguous state where it can be consensual or not-consensual depending on how a person feels about it later.
You never heard of Schrodinger’s Cock?
I understood "chingu" and "sexual predator". I resent this video because one of my best friends is Korean but she mispronounces my name in a different way every time she says it. But this bastard actually says "Chris Avellone" properly. Really shows how much a person is worth.
Chris Avellone pretty much has kpop idol level of status in South Korea. Koreans will be REALLY angry if this case goes bust in court and Chris wont get properly compensated for his trouble.