Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Grand Strategy Crusader Kings III

Larianshill

Larianshill

Arbiter
Joined
Feb 16, 2021
Messages
2,283
thesecret1 said:
After the End: Dogshit. Avoid. Devs fell to massive feature creep where it's almost like every province has a different religion, which just means they all suck because there's not enough focus on fleshing them out. Aside from that, it's more or less vanilla CK3.
Click to expand...
It was pretty disappointing. I've played an americanist republic, and I couldn't get rid of the feeling that I'm just playing vanilla.

thesecret1 said:
AGOT: Needs more time in the oven. Right now, it doesn't even have feature parity with CK2's version, and by a long shot. Aside from that, it seems alright.
Click to expand...
AGOT is kino, and will become better than CK2 as soon as they expand the map to Slaver's Bay and add the War of Five Kings. The way they've implemented dragons alone is a huge upgrade from CK2.

I've also tried Guardians of Azeroth. It's made by a tiny team that can't get anything done, but they promise to add magic this spring, so maybe the mod will become worthwhile then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom