Big Wrangle
Guest
The stock of CDPR stopped progressing around July. Decrease is about 3% so far nothing that'll get people talking. Though I guess you can factor the underwhelming sales for Thornebreaker for future projection.
Does it? Why so?I don't think the investors are doing anything but sweating profusely as the stock maintains its decline.This must have caused heavy salivating among the investors.
Because it's overvalued and there's no reason why it wouldn't? The hike was based on hype and nothing else, they don't even have a tentative release date. Then the Sapkowki case happened. Then one of the directors sold all of his shares. Now they just released financial report 2 weeks ago and the poor performance of Thronebreaker didn't help.Does it? Why so?I don't think the investors are doing anything but sweating profusely as the stock maintains its decline.This must have caused heavy salivating among the investors.
Now available online: https://www.pcgamer.com/story-comes-first-in-the-making-of-cyberpunk-2077/
lol, 60+ hours playing "ruined" games you profess not to like. Get a job dude.Another game to play twice and forget.
lol, 60+ hours playing "ruined" games you profess not to like. Get a job dude.
Obvious troll is obvious
I need someone rich to buyout paradox and hire resurrected Black Isle, by fusing Obsidian and InXile into one, to make a WoD game.
Actually you are a dumb troll, because you said that great story makes a forgettable game. The Witcher 3 aint forgettable at all, you you just hate for no reason.You keep using the word troll, i don't think you know what it means... A troll does not bother to explain his reasoning, moron.
Combat is shit, I dont argue on that and probably wont play it again. But characters and story are great to me.
lol, 60+ hours playing "ruined" games you profess not to like. Get a job dude.
The only reason i suffered through Witcher 3 was because of the world building, the story, and characters. I was already invested in the story since reading ALL the books and playing the prequels before most of you plebs knew Witcher was a thing. Sometimes i get the itch for a 3rd playthrough but when i remember how trash the gameplay was, i stop right there.
Still, i can't say i am interested in Cyberpunk in the same way. For one, cyberpunk as a genre sucks most of the time, unless it is Deus Ex, and i don't know if the story will be likeable. If the gameplay sucks, i will just uninstall. Like i do with most games these days.
Obvious troll is obvious
You keep using the word troll, i don't think you know what it means... A troll does not bother to explain his reasoning, moron.
Yeah, I bet that exact same 30+ hour story was even more fascinating the second time, huh?The only reason i suffered through Witcher 3 TWICE was because of the world building, the story, and characters.
That's pretty tough talk there mister. How many do you actually refund?If the gameplay sucks, i will just uninstall. Like i do with most games these days.
I need someone rich to buyout paradox and hire CDPR to make a WoD game.
I need someone rich to buyout paradox and hire CDPR to make a WoD game.
I need someone rich to buyout paradox and hire resurrected Black Isle, by fusing Obsidian and InXile into one, to make a WoD game.
Oh, poor youThe only reason i suffered through Witcher 3 [twice] was because of the world building, the story, and characters.
I need someone rich to buyout paradox and hire CDPR to make a WoD game.
CDPR would stuff it with romance options and big tiddies for teenage fanboys to jerk off to
Obsidian would make the protagonist purple-haired and gender non-binary and have the enemies be fluffy teddy bears so as not to trigger audiences with scary sights of vampires and werewolves.
Obsidian would make the protagonist purple-haired and gender non-binary and have the enemies be fluffy teddy bears so as not to trigger audiences with scary sights of vampires and werewolves.
So you are saying that they would stay faithful to the source material of the current edition of WoD? Great!
Obsidian would make the protagonist purple-haired and gender non-binary and have the enemies be fluffy teddy bears so as not to trigger audiences with scary sights of vampires and werewolves.
So you are saying that they would stay faithful to the source material of the current edition of WoD? Great!
We don't mention nWoD in these parts.
Obsidian would make the protagonist purple-haired and gender non-binary and have the enemies be fluffy teddy bears so as not to trigger audiences with scary sights of vampires and werewolves.
So you are saying that they would stay faithful to the source material of the current edition of WoD? Great!
We don't mention nWoD in these parts.
Sadly any new game will be based on nWoD.
Obsidian would make the protagonist purple-haired and gender non-binary and have the enemies be fluffy teddy bears so as not to trigger audiences with scary sights of vampires and werewolves.
So you are saying that they would stay faithful to the source material of the current edition of WoD? Great!
We don't mention nWoD in these parts.
Sadly any new game will be based on nWoD.
Quite the pessimist, aren't you? Look how Games Workshop are handling the games they license to devs. None of the new Age of Sigmar crap, just tried and true Warhammer Fantasy.
IIRC Vermintide/Total War being end times is a decision from the devs, not GW. They play pretty fast and loose with it anyways, especially Creative Assembly.But they already starting to license games during the Shit Times like Vermintide 1 and 2.