Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

People News David Gaider: On Romances in Games

shihonage

DEVELOPER
Patron
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
7,181
Location
United States Of Azebarjan
Bubbles In Memoria
RPG romance is stupid.

It cannot believably develop from chemistry between two characters, because it requires the kind of dynamic behind-the-scenes narrative adjustment that is not possible to create. Context of player actions is ignored. You just spent 40 minutes naked, stabbing rats in the crotch, with the object of your affections continuously trying to walk through a wall, and then you kissed...

And after the romance is established on this shaky and clumsy foundation, it does not go beyond a couple of triggers that transform the very notion of romance into something mundane and boring - your partner is essentially reduced to being a mule, a piece of furniture, or an extra gun.

An RPG should do its damndest to hide the underlying strings that pull the puppets around. The world should encourage the player to accept its abstractions and to be able to immerse within its imposed rules. Romance is one of those things that exposes more of the puppetry than it should. Suddenly, that particular NPC is not bordering on barely-making-sense category as all the rest, but she exposes the entire structure as complete nonsense.
 

UnknownBro

Savant
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
373
The best thing about romances in games is that you can skip them.

The moment you penis start asking for boobies is when your brain is out of the ecuation, not a good thing in turn-based tactical games... oh wait....
 

Darkforge

Augur
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
216
All I ask is that if you insist on this rampant faggotry is an option in the game that asks what your sexual preference, is and tailors the romances accordingly. I am not a homosexual I don't want any gay ass elves hitting on my character..
 

commie

The Last Marxist
Patron
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
1,865,260
Location
Where one can weep in peace
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2
RPG romance is stupid.

It cannot believably develop from chemistry between two characters, because it requires the kind of dynamic behind-the-scenes narrative adjustment that is not possible to create. Context of player actions is ignored. You just spent 40 minutes naked, stabbing rats in the crotch, with the object of your affections continuously trying to walk through a wall, and then you kissed...

And after the romance is established on this shaky and clumsy foundation, it does not go beyond a couple of triggers that transform the very notion of romance into something mundane and boring - your partner is essentially reduced to being a mule, a piece of furniture, or an extra gun.

An RPG should do its damndest to hide the underlying strings that pull the puppets around. The world should encourage the player to accept its abstractions and to be able to immerse within its imposed rules. Romance is one of those things that exposes more of the puppetry than it should. Suddenly, that particular NPC is not bordering on barely-making-sense category as all the rest, but she exposes the entire structure as complete nonsense.

Whoooahhh.....that's really deep shit bro....It's like you got ejucations and stuff, all that Lyotard, Derrida, Lacan...man.
 

jewboy

Arbiter
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
657
Location
Oumuamua
It almost seems like Gayder is either trying to get fired or just doesn't care anymore. Maybe he's burned out or he is tired of droning for EA. Probably he's just jealous of all of the kickstarter devs having way more fun actually doing creative interesting stuff instead of EA_RPG2013.
 

waywardOne

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Messages
2,318
There's a Japanese proverb I stumbled across when I was in college. "If you meet a master swordsman, show him your sword; but do not show your poem to one who is not a poet." One of the meanings of that, to me, is that it takes someone just as well-versed in a subject as you for them to be able to appreciate or judge what you do in that subject. For Gaider, he's slowly waking up to the fact that 99% of Bioware's fanbase are neither swordsmen nor poets, so to speak.
 

Diablo169

Arcane
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
1,270
Location
Grim Midlands
Honestly I want them to release an RPG where you get cock-blocked at every turn, the amount of butt-hurt rage would be delicious.
 

racofer

Thread Incliner
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
25,857
Location
Your ignore list.
It almost seems like Gayder is either trying to get fired or just doesn't care anymore. Maybe he's burned out or he is tired of droning for EA. Probably he's just jealous of all of the kickstarter devs having way more fun actually doing creative interesting stuff instead of EA_RPG2013.
And if he does get fired and starts his own kickstarts, the drones will follow and the Antichrist Antigame will be born.

It's best for all of us if he stays where he is.
 

Zeriel

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
13,963
Honestly I want them to release an RPG where you get cock-blocked at every turn, the amount of butt-hurt rage would be delicious.

For whatever reason, this seems like a trope in weeabo games. It's kind of amusing.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom