OctavianRomulus
Learned
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2019
- Messages
- 480
It's not about catering to anyone. It's about depicting the world how a straight man sees it and then inferring ...things by the framing. The most famous example is the painting Earthly Vanity by Hans Memling:how dare developersIt's the observation that the assumed default camera perspective is that of a straight man. It is the depiction of mostly people (but also events) through the eyes of a straight man for the eyes of a straight man.
*checks notes*
develop games that cater towards the overwhelming majority of people who actually play them rather than alienating their fanbases
You have painted a nude woman because you like looking at her this way, but also assume she is looking at herself in the mirror the same way you look at her, so you have named the painting "vanity". This suggests a woman is self-absorbed, duplicitous, and perhaps sexually perverse, especially when they are constantly depicted this way. It goes way beyond "I like sexy women in my video games", trust me.
Then you just can't read the room.Of course there is a problem - they aren't being faithful to the original.You think the problem is her being older, rather than not sexually attractive? Boy, do I got news for you. This whole debacle shows there is a problem somewhere.
I am a gamer at heart, so I am looking at the problem like a gamer would. Shame on me, I guess. But, hey, let's talk about sexual attractivity in video games instead, like a true self-respecting man would. This is totally not juvenile and not pathetic at all!From where I'm standing, no self-respecting man would look at this in this light. It's not only juvenile, but also pathetic.
So you say, but perhaps it's you who's mistaken? Because I have seen plenty of people in this thread bringing actual visual evidence when discussing the point (here, for example). So this isn't just some "the Amazon does not fit my male sexual fantasy" bullshit, like you claim it is.Then you just can't read the room.
Have you noticed these new fads like tiktok and onlyfans? HAVE YOU EVER MET A WOMAN?This suggests a woman is self-absorbed, duplicitous, and perhaps sexually perverse
Games are a form of entertainment, escapism one pays for. Moreover this is a fantasy game, and Fantasy was always the most imaginative genre of all as the mere name suggests - monsters, magic, heroic men with perfect figures, heroic women with perfect figures etc. As for "real" looking people, I can just go out and walk down the street, go to a shop or whatever, I don't need to look at their potato faces in my games I pay for you utter cretin.It's not about catering to anyone. It's about depicting the world how a straight man sees it and then inferring ...things by the framing.
Sure, for some people it might be about the preservation of the original intent, but for most complainers it's not that. They wouldn't use the word "uglify" if that's the case. Ugly for whom?So you say, but perhaps it's you who's mistaken? Because I have seen plenty of people in this thread bringing actual visual evidence when discussing the point (here, for example). So this isn't just some "the Amazon does not fit my male sexual fantasy" bullshit, like you claim it is.Then you just can't read the room.
Don't buy games with non-sexy-for-you women then. This goes for everyone who wants to stare at sexy women in media. Vote with your wallets. We'll see how far that gets you.Games are a form of entertainment, escapism one pays for. Moreover this is a fantasy game, and Fantasy was always the most imaginative genre of all as the mere name suggests - monsters, magic, heroic men with perfect figures, heroic women with perfect figures etc. As for "real" looking people, I can just go out and walk down the street, go to a shop or whatever, I don't need to look at their potato faces in my games I pay for you utter cretin.It's not about catering to anyone. It's about depicting the world how a straight man sees it and then inferring ...things by the framing.
Please, don't start this "nu amazon is a milf" shit again. It's a man in a dress. Ugly for everyone.Ugly for whom?
Sure, for some people it might be about the preservation of the original intent, but for most complainers it's not that. They wouldn't use the word "uglify" if that's the case. Ugly for whom?So you say, but perhaps it's you who's mistaken? Because I have seen plenty of people in this thread bringing actual visual evidence when discussing the point (here, for example). So this isn't just some "the Amazon does not fit my male sexual fantasy" bullshit, like you claim it is.Then you just can't read the room.
I don't think she's ugly, she's more mature in terms of age.Please, don't start this "nu amazon is a milf" shit again. It's a man in a dress. Ugly for everyone.Ugly for whom?
He.I don't think she's ugly, she's more mature in terms of age.Please, don't start this "nu amazon is a milf" shit again. It's a man in a dress. Ugly for everyone.Ugly for whom?
It's ma'am!
I pity you if that's a normal, mature looking woman for you. She has obviously male features.I don't think she's ugly, she's more mature in terms of age.Please, don't start this "nu amazon is a milf" shit again. It's a man in a dress. Ugly for everyone.Ugly for whom?
Seeing as she's based off of a real actress' face, I don't know what to tell you. Maybe rethink your gender/sex theology.I pity you if that's a normal, mature looking woman for you. She has obviously male features.
Cool. It never happened before.based off of a real actress' face
maybe women should try painting then lmaoYou have painted a nude woman because you like looking at her this way, but also assume she is looking at herself in the mirror the same way you look at her, so you have named the painting "vanity". This suggests a woman is self-absorbed, duplicitous, and perhaps sexually perverse, especially when they are constantly depicted this way. It goes way beyond "I like sexy women in my video games", trust me.
Than it would be just picture of woman artist covering woman model.maybe women should try painting then lmaoYou have painted a nude woman because you like looking at her this way, but also assume she is looking at herself in the mirror the same way you look at her, so you have named the painting "vanity". This suggests a woman is self-absorbed, duplicitous, and perhaps sexually perverse, especially when they are constantly depicted this way. It goes way beyond "I like sexy women in my video games", trust me.
You'd have to be blind to think that looks remotely like this
One can always play post-apo gamesAs for "real" looking people
This seems nothing like the failure that was Reforged, so get some new material.
Maybe tell me that they did a really shitty job:Seeing as she's based off of a real actress' face, I don't know what to tell you. Maybe rethink your gender/sex theology.I pity you if that's a normal, mature looking woman for you. She has obviously male features.
They are. Maybe that's why we are getting this older version of the Amazon.maybe women should try painting then lmao
the amazon looks like a dudeThey are. Maybe that's why we are getting this older version of the Amazon.maybe women should try painting then lmao