Fedora Master
STOP POSTING
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2017
- Messages
- 31,670
Everything must be deconstructed and turned to shit these days.
Cultural Marxism is about tearing down everything of value. Equality is achieved when everything is worth nothing.
Everything must be deconstructed and turned to shit these days.
That's because I don't have an argument and this isn't a debate (let alone a debate I want to be involved in). I don't have a high opinion about debates in general. I just asked a few questions that are worth asking ourselves and pointed out where the actual arguments are being made, that's all.Lacrymas the point being you aren’t actually *making* a specific argument
That's a disturbing image. Well you're a spider so of course not. You'd get squished. And spiders just don't... I don't think."welcome to a fraction of what the non-straights are subjected to"
I'm sorry I don't find anal sex with another man very sexy. Can my Amazon be hot again?
"welcome to a fraction of what the non-straights are subjected to"
I'm sorry I don't find anal sex with another man very sexy.
Bullshit. I don't care about Sorceress' slightly longer skirt. I doubt I'd notice detail this small in game. But the complete "revision" of the iconic characters? In a supposed remaster? You bet that people who care about their favourite game (this or any other) won't be OK with that. While some characters get more attention than others, it's universally agreed that Barbarian's and Druid's "transformations" are also a bothed job.Don't be naive, it's about them not being sexy enough.
This way the Codex can justly say: "Everything is shit".Everything must be deconstructed and turned to shit these days.
Even if I were to believe you personally care only that they've changed the looks of the characters too radically, I'm not as naive as to believe that is the case for everyone. The majority of this outrage is about them not being sexy enough in the eyes of the complainers.Bullshit. I don't care about Sorceress' slightly longer skirt. I doubt I'd notice detail this small in game. But the complete "revision" of the iconic characters? In a supposed remaster?Don't be naive, it's about them not being sexy enough.
So you say, but if the people who complain are the ones who grew up with Diablo 2 (or are big fans of Diablo series), then I'd say you're mistaken in your assumption, because people like that are closer to true gamers and have different priorities.Even if I were to believe you personally care only that they've changed the looks of the characters too radically, I'm not as naive as to believe that is the case for everyone. The majority of this outrage is about them not being sexy enough in the eyes of the complainers.
It depends on what you mean by this. How do you know it isn't a social construct? And what do you mean by "social construct"?beauty is a social construct (hint: it isn't)
There are many reasons why a shirtless guy isn't considered exploited, but the quick answer is that it's all about framing and how our culture perceives men, their bodies, and their sexuality.The most funny thing about this discussion is the lack of self-awareness. The SJWs bitch and moan about thin, beautiful women and completely ignore that all guys in video games are super buff gymbros. So, Miranda's ass has to go from the Mass Effect remaster but all this shirtless scenes of James Vega are still there. But yes, please tell us more about unrealistic beauty standards. Because obviously it is harder for women not to eat all the cake than for men to get fucking ripped :D
It depends on what you mean by this. How do you know it isn't a social construct? And what do you mean by "social construct"?
There are many reasons why a shirtless guy isn't considered exploited, but the quick answer is that it's all about framing and how our culture perceives men, their bodies, and their sexuality.
So, for instance, the media is filled with thin women which gives the impression that thin is more attractive than fat which is how this beauty standard is created. The claim is that without this messaging, this standard would not exist and as this standard is understood as harmful the messaging must change.
So, for instance, the media is filled with thin women which gives the impression that thin is more attractive than fat which is how this beauty standard is created. The claim is that without this messaging, this standard would not exist and as this standard is understood as harmful the messaging must change.
That's the kicker. Why the fuck would the thin standard be considered harmful, if, from a purely medical perspective, fat people are less healthy?
Which, by the way, is probably the real reason why fat people aren't considered attractive. They would make poor mates in the long run, and even worse, our animal brains don't want to risk their propensity towards gaining weight being hereditary.
I don't get why people think "thin" women are attractive (which probably is an euphemism for anorexia). Attractive people exercise. A woman can be fully clothed and still turn heads, because people are going to notice her shape. But I guess lazy women like to think they can get pretty just by starving themselves, because putting the actual work in how you look is... well, harder.Therefore, pictures of attractive, thin women in the media are a hot button issue for followers of this theory.
You both fail to acknowledge that many people are attracted to fatness in particular (chubby chasers) or don't mind it if it happens to arise.
My current ...something is not the fittest person in the world, but I still think he's the most attractive man I've ever seen
Something is "considered" attractive only within a culture and there have been many eras in which chubby women were considered peak sexy.
The point of the "fat activists" is not to force people to think they are attractive, but to combat the discrimination faced by fat people that have real consequences. For example, doctors are more likely to dismiss a patient's symptoms if they are fat and only give the advice to lose weight without further investigation.
But it is.Ok cool, but again, this is a D2 remaster of the original. Not D2 ching-chong & tranny edition.