I didn't suggest implementing the ruleset or implementation of the combat in arcanum, which is about ten-times more complex than the combat in fallout, I suggested keeping the combat system of fallout 1, but havind had the option to turn on the RT/TB-system of arcanum. I also wasn't even remotely close to saying that everything should be real time. Damn, sometimes I swear that half of the codexers can't read for shit, and that they're just guessing what's written.Arcanum had shit combat. I didn't know which was worse, RT or TB. And yes, Fallout 1 combat wasn't as deep as for example JA2 combat, but it was surely fuckton better than what you suggest. Everything should be real time, so that "tedious" combat is at least faster?
BAN EVERYONE THAT THINKS DIFFERENTLY
Word. I still don't understand how people think that Fallout 3 is horrible, while New Vegas is excellent. It has better writing, sure, but not much better. And everything else, that was oh so decline when fallout 3 came out, remains: Like the change to first person, it has pop-a-mole action, pop-a-mole graphics (whatever that means, I did see someone on the codex describe the graphics in skyrim as such though, so it probably also applies here) and pop-a-mole voice acting.While Fallout 3 was shit, I enjoyed the hell out of New Vegas. So if Bethesda makes Fallout 4 I'll skip that and wait for the inevitable Obsidian sequel.
First post after a year of lurking and already a beth bash and Obsidian praise..... you have a bright future ahead of you waiting in the Codex.
Writing is actually good. Writing in FO3 was a joke. Quest structures, branching and c&c are the best in any FO game. That includes FO1. It's a brilliant game delivered in an unfortunate medium but would otherwise not be delivered at all.
Fallout died with 1.
Possibly, but the fact making these two antagonists give up is so easy and instantaneous is awful writing either way. At least in Fallout 1 you had an okay argument, though.
The day will come when a diplomatic solution means more than two minutes of passing speech passes or showing evidence near the end of the game. Or maybe it won't.
It will take place in my anus with threeexpansionsDLC add-ons featuring three new settings: a toilet bowl, a sewer pipe and a waste treatment facility.
Codex-hivemind drones are hilarious
BAN EVERYONE THAT THINKS DIFFERENTLY
Going to another forum, where everyone thinks just like me: The primary motivation for hivedrones to lurk at the codex, wouldn't bring even me half the lulz compared to staying here. It would also be boring.
Anyway, I don't see what the fuss is all about. The suggestion that fallout 1 could have been better, had it had the option to turn on the same RT/TB hybrid as in arcanum, but otherwise changing nothing, is uncontrovertial to say the least. Hell, it would even be piss easy to implement, and can probably still be made with mods. It would be free winz for everyone: For those who think that the only good combat is turn-based combat, and for others, like me, who did not see the point of having TB-combat in fallout 1.
Improve on the turnbased combat of fallout, not tack on another combat option that'll probably be unbalanced.
Yeah, that would also work. But I'm not sure if you understand the way RT combat in arcanum was implemented. It was sped up TB combat with autuomatic end turn. There is no unbalance, if it's not unbalanced turn based.Improve on the turnbased combat of fallout, not tack on another combat option that'll probably be unbalanced.
Compare fighting the golems in the Black Mountain Clan in tb to rt.Yeah, that would also work. But I'm not sure if you understand the way RT combat in arcanum was implemented. It was sped up TB combat with autuomatic end turn. There is no unbalance, if it's not unbalanced turn based.Improve on the turnbased combat of fallout, not tack on another combat option that'll probably be unbalanced.
Also, awesome writing in New Vegas! Doctor finds and heals you but can't tell if you're a man or a woman and has to ask you.
For that alone this game deserves not to give it a second look.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-nWMMT8BUVs#t=105sI don't think that happens. IIRC, It's Fallout 3 that has the 'Are you a boy or a girl?' moment - New Vegas just incorporates gender into the facial editor. The doctor says something vague about seeing the results of his surgery for yourself.
Fallout would still be a good game even if it had ponies and south park characters while retaining SPECIAL, turn based combat and isometric setting ( hmmmmm obsidian making SP rpg...)Fallout died with 1.
ban gaudaost
Fallout's combat was terrible, though. I can't imagine why you'd like it if you weren't a storyfag.
FeelTheRads said:It's not direct, but the first thing you get to choose after "you let me know if I left anything out of place" is the sex.
The whole character creation is fucking retarded (which MIGHT be Bethesda's fault since they insist of having this "immersive" shit), but even the dialog with this doctor Mitchell is stupid. And in the several hours I played, I haven't seen it get much better. It may not be full-retard like Bethesda's (although it has its share of WTF moments), but it's not something to brag about either.
It is.(absolutely retarded combat, but then you'll have shitheads who think it's somehow better than Arcanum's combat)