Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Fallout: New Vegas - By Obsidian, For Bethesda

Joined
Aug 23, 2008
Messages
34
elander_ said:
You only play FOT in RT mode if you want to. I played FOT entirely in CTB (continuous TB mode) and only switched to RT when the enemy was mostly eliminated. If VATS was like FOT it would be the same.
Oh, you mean that there is the option to _never_ leave VATS, at least not while there is hostile in the certain zone.

But if you still decide, in the middle of combat, to leave VATS and go into RT, how much of an impact do you think that all the traits that have a significance impact on you character in VATS mode, should effect your character in RT mode, in order to maintain a signal coherent combat system (feel free to replace "coherent combat system" with "combat system that doesn't give a player with good twitch skills an advantaged over a player with bad one", think PvP)?
 
Unwanted

Micormic

Unwanted
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
939
raving nincompoop said:
elander_ said:
You only play FOT in RT mode if you want to. I played FOT entirely in CTB (continuous TB mode) and only switched to RT when the enemy was mostly eliminated. If VATS was like FOT it would be the same.
Oh, you mean that there is the option to _never_ leave VATS, at least not while there is hostile in the certain zone.

But if you still decide, in the middle of combat, to leave VATS and go into RT, how much of an impact do you think that all the traits that have a significance impact on you character in VATS mode, should effect your character in RT mode, in order to maintain a signal coherent combat system (feel free to replace "coherent combat system" with "combat system that doesn't give a player with good twitch skills an advantaged over a player with bad one", think PvP)?
stupid faggot lol
 

Arcanoix

Scholar
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
574
Anthony Davis said:
M_I_C_K_E_Y_M_O_U_S_E said:
Why isn't Avellone working on this FO3.5? AP can't be it since it's only 6 months from release so most or all of the writing should be done by now.

Avellone wears many hats at Obsidian. He is currently the chief creative officer (or something like that) as well as the project director and lead designer for AP.

To whomever asked up above, Feargus is of course still at Obsidian. He is currently the CEO and project director of an unannounced project that is not FO.

Josh Sawyer is the project director and lead designer of Fallout: New Vegas.

They put Sawyer on FO3.5...Decline.

:(
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
Whatever. Obsidian has no talent, call me when Avellone will release a good game because in the past 10 years he didn't.
I actually even bet that Obsidian's game will be even more boring than original failure. After all they've managed to make NWN1 combat system even worse and that's a huge achievement.
 

obediah

Erudite
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,051
MetalCraze said:
After all they've managed to make NWN1 combat system even worse and that's a huge achievement.

Even more impressively, they fixed NWN1 combat's biggest flaw ( D&Diablo no party control) and still managed to make it worse.

Xor said:
Skyway's material is getting stale.

I agree. It's about time we get some good games for a change.
 

Shannow

Waster of Time
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,386
Location
Finnegan's Wake
Kraszu said:
I didn't play NWN2, how the combat could be any worse then in NWN?

Take NWN1's combat, add BG combat, remove AI, add 3D with a wonky camera, remove isometric POV, add a laggy UI, add hundreds of camera adjustment possibilities that all suck...
It wasn't easy but Obsidian managed just fine.
 

Herbert West

Arbiter
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
1,293
Xor said:
Skyway's material is getting stale.

I believe it's entirely possible to create Skyway's electronic simulacrum that would randomly generate "itz shit" posts in such a way that none would spot any difference.
 

Oarfish

Prophet
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Messages
2,511
Herbert West said:
Xor said:
Skyway's material is getting stale.

I believe it's entirely possible to create Skyway's electronic simulacrum that would randomly generate "itz shit" posts in such a way that none would spot any difference.

All posts is being a bit crap, only returned 4 pages for input set. Not enough good old skyway negativity in there.

Markov-Skyway said:
I always wondered why the A film is regarded as subpar to or Now is an action comic movie similar to Batman and the likes but It has suspence It has a nice location It has suspence It has action and a Topic Best Movie Fight Scene I already forgot how awesome the Mortal Combat scenes are Great camera work innovative choreography awesome artstyle great music EPIC Oh and Gladiator had some nice scenes Descent was nice or good shockers nice gore nice claustrophobic feeling nice chicks Martyrs on

Markov-Skyway said:
I always wonder who does the trailers for Bethesduh Btw nice setting You know even for Fallout it would be interesting to wander in Louisiana swamps Good soundtrack too Too bad it has Bethes Its still retarded What the fuck do you need MB for for Naval Ops Especially when something as horribly compicated as Diablo potentially hundreds of items each with individual randomized stats Topic Best Movie Fight Scene I already forgot how awesome the Mortal Combat scenes are Great camera work innovative choreography awesome artstyle great music EPIC Oh and Gladiator had some

Markov-Skyway said:
Who here has triedwill try Demons Soul skyway Topic This totally deserves its so awesome the A Want your cock next Driving around in fucking canalsroads fo Power corrupts Savegames have physics gameplay good Topic Lets play Shitout is an action and went rapidly downhill afterwards plummeting into skyway I tried to stay in streetfight skyway It has Bethes Driving around in fucking canalsroads fo Topic Corpse Crew Alpha Version A film is training for Fallout it yay Btw nice Oh
 

Sckarecrow92

Educated
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
286
Luzur said:
i think Skyway really is just SKYNET trolling around before judgement day.

The RPGcodex is actually where Skynet gains sentience.

Talk about a bad first impression, though. No wonder it tries to destroy humanity.
 

bat_boro

Arcane
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
1,545
Oh, well, I thought that something good might come out of it, since it stars Christian Bale and I just loved his 3.10 to Yuma acting.

What about the new Star Trek?
 

Xor

Arcane
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
9,345
Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Divinity: Original Sin 2
It's terrible if you're a Star Trek fan or mediocre otherwise.
 

Deleted member 7219

Guest
Xor said:
It's terrible if you're a Star Trek fan or mediocre otherwise.

I'm a Star Trek fan (mainly TOS and TNG, but DS9 and VOY have good episodes too), and I liked it.
 

Ahzaruuk

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
1,184
Location
Just a city called Sirius.
VonVentrue said:
Black said:
So if we have Obsidian guys here allow me to take advantage of you.

1) Will it feature turn-based combat and isometric view.

The most important question of them all. I will never consider NV a Fallout game unless this requirement (or the first part of it, at least) is met.
Optimists can go to hell for all I care.
So let me get this straight...


It could have no sense of continuity of the Fallout setting and have homosexual sparkle-fairies everywhere.

BUT IT HAS TB AND ISO VIEW, SO UT MUST BE FALLOUT/!
 

Deleted member 7219

Guest
Ahzaruuk said:
VonVentrue said:
Black said:
So if we have Obsidian guys here allow me to take advantage of you.

1) Will it feature turn-based combat and isometric view.

The most important question of them all. I will never consider NV a Fallout game unless this requirement (or the first part of it, at least) is met.
Optimists can go to hell for all I care.
So let me get this straight...


It could have no sense of continuity of the Fallout setting and have homosexual sparkle-fairies everywhere.

BUT IT HAS TB AND ISO VIEW, SO UT MUST BE FALLOUT/!

It's fucking stupid, isn't it?
 

Black

Arcane
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
1,873,126
Matt7895 said:
Ahzaruuk said:
VonVentrue said:
Black said:
So if we have Obsidian guys here allow me to take advantage of you.

1) Will it feature turn-based combat and isometric view.

The most important question of them all. I will never consider NV a Fallout game unless this requirement (or the first part of it, at least) is met.
Optimists can go to hell for all I care.
So let me get this straight...


It could have no sense of continuity of the Fallout setting and have homosexual sparkle-fairies everywhere.

BUT IT HAS TB AND ISO VIEW, SO UT MUST BE FALLOUT/!

It's fucking stupid, isn't it?

Yeah, that P&P emulating shit- pretty stupid. They should've went fps in 1997 instead of making those weird design decisions.

And hey, nice going listening to a tesforums-level moron. Mechanics is one. The world is two. It won't be Fallout without post-apo USA with 50s pop touch and it won't be Fallout without the mechanics we all already discussed to death.
So, go suck on a dick, you fucking piece of shit, who can't even troll right!
 

Ahzaruuk

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
1,184
Location
Just a city called Sirius.
Black said:
Matt7895 said:
Ahzaruuk said:
VonVentrue said:
Black said:
So if we have Obsidian guys here allow me to take advantage of you.

1) Will it feature turn-based combat and isometric view.

The most important question of them all. I will never consider NV a Fallout game unless this requirement (or the first part of it, at least) is met.
Optimists can go to hell for all I care.
So let me get this straight...


It could have no sense of continuity of the Fallout setting and have homosexual sparkle-fairies everywhere.

BUT IT HAS TB AND ISO VIEW, SO UT MUST BE FALLOUT/!

It's fucking stupid, isn't it?

Yeah, that P&P emulating shit- pretty stupid. They should've went fps in 1997 instead of making those weird design decisions.

And hey, nice going listening to a tesforums-level moron. Mechanics is one. The world is two. It won't be Fallout without post-apo USA with 50s pop touch and it won't be Fallout without the mechanics we all already discussed to death.
So, go suck on a dick, you fucking piece of shit, who can't even troll right!
You'll never get a new fallout game in that case. No developer in their right mind is gonna make a game with mechanics that was used 10 years ago.

Especially not FO's TB combat.
 

Double Ogre

Scholar
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
765
FO's combat was mediocre at best, to be fair. Single character TB is never a good idea, and in Fallout's case it was nothing spectacular either. When you get your combat skill to around 120% you just aim for the eyes and that's it. No other tactics required. The combat was well balanced, but still very simplistic.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom