that's just $57.
weird, this is what it shows for meYou can always switch to kwan.
Too bad I don't get paid in US$.that's just $57.
Yulia, yes I do see some similarities as well now that you mention it. The chin and cheekbones being the most perceivable difference between the two.The art for the mysterious lady, is that based on one of the devs that used to host the livestreams? Seems really alike.
It's spare change, easy decision.
I don't know, demon mommy, 99€ is a whole lot...
The Great Squeenix Backlog Dumpening is upon us!
NuTombRaider
Tomb Raider: Legend
Tomb Raider: Anniversary
Tomb Raider: Underworld
The Great Squeenix Backlog Dumpening is upon us!
NuTombRaider
Tomb Raider: Legend
Tomb Raider: Anniversary
Tomb Raider: Underworld
You can find them easily online.The Great Squeenix Backlog Dumpening is upon us!
NuTombRaider
Tomb Raider: Legend
Tomb Raider: Anniversary
Tomb Raider: Underworld
Still no expansions for TR 1-3
oh well
I've generally heard nothing but praise for 1 and The Last Revelation. 2 is generally positive, and 3 I believe is the hardest of the original series. Chronicles if you really like the gameplay, it was just something to pass the time between TLR and AoD. Angel of Darkness is a buggy, unfinished mess that never got fixed. As for the Crystal Dynamix series, I liked Legend, but there's no denying it was decline. It is TR, but with all the typical design trademarks of the era. Cutscene-heavy, lots of weird unlockable content, and following the usual TPS design template, that ironically enough was inspired by the earlier TR games. The later ones failed to hold my interest.As someone who's recently played NuTombRaider and thinks it's a bit shit, which of the older Tomb Raiders is worth a go? Isn't there other that is considered better than the others? Anniversary perhaps?
The Great Squeenix Backlog Dumpening is upon us!
NuTombRaider
Tomb Raider: Legend
Tomb Raider: Anniversary
Tomb Raider: Underworld
The first is the best, followed very closely by the second (some would argue it's even better), both are superb games; the third is a pain with terrible choices both in level design and mechanics (turret defense, clumsy bloated boss fights, irritating reiterated backtracking, poor "readibility" of interactive objects and surfaces) and the fourth has a good start and some brilliant levels but drags on and becomes a chore as you race to the end through the most uninspired platforming in the classic series, heavily suffering from bloat -Chronicles, however, is undeservedly bashed as it's great fun and introduces interesting new situations in its short albeit intense runtime, great variety and a cinematographic style that while a harbinger of decline was still charming.As someone who's recently played NuTombRaider and thinks it's a bit shit, which of the older Tomb Raiders is worth a go? Isn't there other that is considered better than the others? Anniversary perhaps?