You really don't know the horror that is fallout 3.
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/inde...play-a-shitty-game-fallout-3-completed.34530/
Fair warning: Reading it might cause you to lose some part of your sanity. Not much as playing though.
4. Intelligent, hairy deathclaws. Would't have minded the hairy (are they even the same animal?) but them being intelligent is highly canon-breaking.
GOG Fallout versions are the shitty euro versions iirc. Remember to patch the kids in.
See it's funny because smarter people than you made that exact metaphor.
4. Intelligent, hairy deathclaws. Would't have minded the hairy (are they even the same animal?) but them being intelligent is highly canon-breaking.
Deathclaws were initially hairy in FO1. They removed the hair when it didn't render properly, so having them be hairy in FOT is a nod to the original design. Intelligent deathclaws were introduced in FO2, so even if you consider it canon-breaking I don't see how it can be an issue with FOT, since it's not the one that brought that to the series.
GOG Fallout versions are the shitty euro versions iirc. Remember to patch the kids in.
Only Fallout 1 is the euro version. Fallout 2 is glorious kwan version.
It wasn't a terrible game on its own but it was a terrible Fallout game, imho.But seriously, Fallout 3 was objectively fucking terrible compared to Fallout 1 and 2. There is no weaseling around that fact. It might be a decent hiking simulator (I wouldn't know) but as a Fallout sequel it is the second worst game in the franchise, and it only escapes being the worst because FOBOS exists.
It did nothing well and many things horribly, on top of that it has a lot of technical issues.It wasn't a terrible game on its own
It did nothing well
and many things horribly
I don't know why anyone plays them either!nobody plays Bethesda games for the characters anyway.
I don't know why people play ascii rogue crap, yet they are obviously popular and we even get regular codex news on some obscure crawlers which have even less to do with rpg than F3, so what?I don't know why anyone plays them either!
FOT did away with sensible stats and dmg values for weapons and introduced shitty loot "progression" instead. Which means that by the time you can start recruiting deathclaws your normal goons with weapons will be much deadlier. And the deathclaws as meleers simply can't stand up to the ordnance the enemies bring up against you. And they were also less tough than in FO1/2.I think Deathclaws in FOT are kinda nerfed, through. Original Gangsta Deathclaws are pratically bullet-proof, and require a ungodly ammount of ordinance to take down, or a flamer/laser, and they're way faster than humans (I think 12 AP or something). Deathclaws in FOT can be defeated by your AK-47-toting squads no problem, but then again my memory of FOT is kinda clouded.
Top notch exploration? Hardly, with rubble blocking ways, metro tunnels filled with cannon fodder and radiation walls.
It did nothing well and many things horribly, on top of that it has a lot of technical issues.It wasn't a terrible game on its own
How is that not the definition of "terrible"?
The exploration was top notch.It did nothing well
Oh wow, I see a last grasp attempt at the most dumbfuck statement of 2013and we even get regular codex news on some obscure crawlers which have even less to do with rpg than F3, so what?
Comrade Yewriej has scored good point here
But Herve is evil of the past though and Bethpizda will rape the corpse of fallout in most un-tasteful way Forever.
Fuck those losers. Seriously, what gives? People love GOG and I highly doubt any Bethesda release of the old Fallout games would be comparable in terms of features, support or bonus items. Fallout games are still top sellers on GOG and GOG has way more reach than the... what, Bethesda Store or some shit?It seems that Bethesda has no working relationship with GOG whatsoever and that they aren't interested in forming one
Developer? Definitely, people love Bethesda Game Studios. Publisher? Most people don't seem to give a shit about Bethesda Softworks itself. Generally speaking though, I have heard a lot of stories that suggest ZeniMax is a pretty standard triple-A publisher - that is, petty, exploitative, performs many legally questionable activities, etc.Is there any other game developer more hated than Bethesda?
Th4if and Deus Ex are two different teams in the same studio.Eidos Montreal deserves at least a little credit for DX:HR.
It's not his fault, he's French. I think everyone over there looks that way.I still can't believe how anyone at Interplay ever thought it was a good idea to go in business with a guy who looks like this. He looks like he could molest your children by enticing them with candy and shitty console RPG's.
Have you read Codex LP of F3? It is bad game with awful writing, moronic story and theme park enviroment; if you want to play sandbox hike simulator pick Morrowind, FNV or Far Cry 3 instead.
The same reason we play Skyrim - yes, almost all of its systems are broken or clunky, but there is simply nothing else to provide similar experience and gameplay.