rusty_shackleford
Arcane
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 50,754
I wonder if Rowling can sue Kotaku for that, doesn't the UK have very strict libel laws?
Well, they are forbidden, so I don't expect you being able to use them. It will probably end up with you using regular disarm spell, just like Harry & Co. do in the books. Then again, they do state something about the possibility of "yielding to the temptation of more sinister magic", so who knows?She could've claimed that until the fourth novel, where it's explicitly stated that ANYONE can use the three forbidden spells. There's nothing special about them. They aren't this horrible power possessed only by people of pure evil, as they should be in a fable. Instead, you can just pick it up in your spare time.
That's not entirely true. While Hogwarts was always the centerpiece, there were places outside of its walls that saw action...:The game feels too late (and also misframed). The technology for such a game was around 15 years ago (when Bully was released). The franchise no longer seems as important, and the preview seems to emphasize the off-campus adventuring more than the intramural aspects, even though the intramural aspects really were the heart of the franchise.
The first leak, the real one said there will be forbidden curses for the MC to learn. And about everyone being able to use them - Potter wanted to torture the hag that killed Sirius, but being fueled by righteous anger didn't give the spell It's needed power - mainly delight in cruelty and malevolence. It's a theme about spells there actually, like Potters mother sacrificing herself and powering the spell with love to protect him. So yeah, curses are actually powered by literal evil.Well, they are forbidden, so I don't expect you being able to use them. It will probably end up with you using regular disarm spell, just like Harry & Co. do in the books. Then again, they do state something about the possibility of "yielding to the temptation of more sinister magic", so who knows?She could've claimed that until the fourth novel, where it's explicitly stated that ANYONE can use the three forbidden spells. There's nothing special about them. They aren't this horrible power possessed only by people of pure evil, as they should be in a fable. Instead, you can just pick it up in your spare time.
That's not entirely true. While Hogwarts was always the centerpiece, there were places outside of its walls that saw action...:The game feels too late (and also misframed). The technology for such a game was around 15 years ago (when Bully was released). The franchise no longer seems as important, and the preview seems to emphasize the off-campus adventuring more than the intramural aspects, even though the intramural aspects really were the heart of the franchise.
...so it makes sense to widen the game world a little and include them. Especially if it's not done at the cost of the school itself (which would be stupid, considering it's the most important part of the universe).
Well, we know the protagonist is going to be a 5th year student, which makes him 16 y.o. Which means you are not playing a kid, which is great, yet I wouldn't hope for anything too mature either. We can probably expect it to be similar to movies thematecally.The biggest problem I forsee, is that this game will be created for children despite the core fan base being in their late 20s and early 30s.
The early games were kinda cool, I've played a lot through the first 3.
Not sure who even cares about Potter nowadays.
I remember a PC game where you had to go around as Harry Potter, killing small brown gnomes while platforming.The early games were kinda cool, I've played a lot through the first 3.
Not sure who even cares about Potter nowadays.
Only played the first one myself. It was a bit shit and easy to be honest, but you don't notice that when you're 11. Plus the music by Jeremy Soule was great and the game as a whole was pretty atmospheric apart from the FLIIIIIIPENDOOOOO!!!111
Game Boy Color games were pretty good I seem to remember.
Well, we know the protagonist is going to be a 5th year student, which makes him 16 y.o. Which means you are not playing a kid, which is great, yet I wouldn't hope for anything too mature either. We can probably expect it to be similar to movies thematecally.The biggest problem I forsee, is that this game will be created for children despite the core fan base being in their late 20s and early 30s.
I vow to buy this game on day one for full price if I can play as a Goblin
the jewish kid was secretly called goldberg
The funny thing about JK Rowling is that she went from Woke to Retarded to Gas all the Trans in, what, a year or two?
My theory is way better because it might include a future edition of Harry Potter with more n-words with hard rs.The funny thing about JK Rowling is that she went from Woke to Retarded to Gas all the Trans in, what, a year or two?
My impression is that she hasn't changed at all from her woke persona. What has happened is a combination of the ground moving under her and her being wilfully misrepresented by the tranny lobby at every turn. Case in point being her recent book, which despite what you might have read on twitter, isn't about a tranny going around murdering people.
In a game where wizard is the only playable class, I'm going to expect
a lot of faggotry
I wonder if Rowling ever thought about the long-term consequences of leaning into the crazy fandom, making Dumbledore gay and Hermione black, leading Twitter mobs, etc.
I would, however, play a HP-skinned Theme Hospital where you design your wizard school to maximise revenue, set up souvenir shops for visitors, and quietly shred the dead bodies of students in classes gone wrong.
But the first leads to the second. It's like being all for rolling that boulder from the top of the hill, but being against that boulder smashing into that house sitting underneath the hill.Ever think maybe she's just a genuine person who was for gay rights and racial diversity but thinks eradicating the meaning of female is stupid?
Old Hermes would like to see Dogon wizards.Exactly, maybe you could have colored people in the school but they would be black Africans, not mixed race Britts.Britain was a colonial empire so you would think there would be wizards from the colonies and holdings there, from both Africa and the Orient, makes sense for wizards from all the four corners of the world to gather there. Not like in this game however, because each would bring a different body of teachings and ways, not pseudo-British children, because those would not just be Anglo-Saxon only with maybe some Jews also but also upper class. That kind of thing would be a secret society and order in a normal high-status private school and even if that would make a good story this is not that.
It is not nuance, if you saw off the tree branch which you sit upon you will fall. One thing is predicated to another. Not hard math. Put an equal sign between men and women and it must go in both directions, Rowling do not want it to, but it does.nuANcE Is bAD!