Kyl Von Kull
The Night Tripper
Historical fiction sucks, honestly. There is no point to it, history already exists and requires no fiction to be indulged or researched. Moreover when a person or a group of people attempt to create historical fiction, they will not be able to even come close to depth, complexity and variety real history offers, after all its a story of countless people.
However a low fantasy fiction interwoven in historicity and verisimilitude could be extremely appealing if the intricacies of loose belief systems, court intrigue and faction politics were to be applied successfully. However that is not about a game being historical, that's about a game being in-depth.
I generally agree that historical truth is more entertaining than historical fiction, but for periods where we have less documentation well-researched fiction can be excellent. I loved Gore Vidal’s Julian, even though he basically just did to Ammianus Marcellinus what Robert Graves did to Suetonius. Although Suetonius was basically writing historical fiction at the time and that’s pretty great, too.
Hillary Mantel’s books on the French Revolution and Thomas Cromwell also get a big thumbs up. But she’s writing about real people and the fiction is mostly just covering gaps in the historical record.