Darkzone
Arcane
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Messages
- 2,323
Problem is in Middle Ages there actually weren't that many forests, just freely standing in the freeware countryside. The richest lords had some, as their private hunting grounds, but other than that everything was cut down for firewood or timber.A forest that actually looks like a forest. Huh.
I guess they decided to pass on that particular historical detail so we won't be running around the virtual equivalent of Ukraine - fields, fields and more fields.
Perhaps this applies to Bohemia, but even then i wouldn't be sure about this. Because the last living urus or aurochs was killed in poland in 17th or 18th century, the last free living wisents in WW1. But this was in bialowieza, once the protected hunting ground of the polish kings.
Nearly all mighty noblemen keep forests as their own hunting grounds and then the were the swamps. The swamps around Rom were dried out by mussolini and the pripet swamps were dried out by the soviets after WW2. Ukraine has the best grounds for plantation of crops in europe called black earth, but why the ukrainians cannot properly use this, i cannot tell you. Bohemia had a large population density in the middle ages compared to Poland or Hungary, so yes the amount of forests in bohemia should be far less than this of poland and ukraine in this times (around 10 million people for 1 million km^2, poland itself had only 3.5 million ). HRE had in 1500AD only 12 million people.