-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Game News Legends of Eisenwald Released
- Thread starter Infinitron
- Start date
Aterdux Entertainment
Aterdux Entertainment
Game is a bit demanding on CPU, so closing other applications will help. Also, if notebook, make sure it runs on its good card, not Intel HD. Nvidia settings will help with that.
That's the issue I heard only from the cracked version of the game.
Gregz
Arcane
Well you certainly don't need to be a clone of Napoleon in order to be successful in the combat aspect. On the acclaimed and "totally a thing" scale of SITHOFASS (Strategists In The History Of Time And Space Scale) I would put it near the level of Hitler or even Emperor Skutaxx II.
The game plays a little different compared to King's Bounty mainly due to the fact that you work with single units - which get knocked out and can be healed up to full health - instead of, as I like to call them, number mountains known from familiar games like King's Bounty or HOMM. So playing mediocre in the combat encounters and having units get wiped off the board is not as big of a deal because you can just heal them back up in exchange for a relatively small payment of resources. Which in this case happens to be gold, the only variable resource in the game next to unit experience and unit equipment. The latter two are accumulated in a more linear fashion.
Legends of Eisenwald is broken down into single maps/chapters, when transitioning to the next one you loose most of your accumulated wealth (advanced troops, gold, equipment). You only get to keep the equipment and experience on your Avatar, sometimes a couple selected troops (including the equipment on their persons) and a handful of legendary items you managed to gain via special quests.
Like I mentioned you do loose all your leftover troops, gold and equipment from the inventory - so you can't simply unequip the troops before the transition for the sake of selling them for a cheap gold boost at the beginning of the next map.
This was obviously done for balance reasons and I personally don't have a problem with it, but judging from various forum posts and reviews apparently many people don't like to loose their grinded and powerlevelled assets. Perhaps they treat this title a little different compared to other strategy games because this game has stronger RPG ties.
During my experience with about half a dozen maps thus far I found that your typical map plays somewhat like a 4X:
- Explore the map: either a very big chunk or all of it, with the goal of finding quest hooks and identifying the strength of the various enemy stacks. You'll recruit your initial troops along the way as well.
- Expand your stack & Exploit the map: by probing the in the "Explore phase" uncovered quests you identify the easiest ones, solve them and fight the lower level/number stacks on the map in order to expand the strength of your stack via experience and equipment, often also recruiting one or two additional units depending on how much gold you manage to obtain in this phase.
- Exterminate: tackle the medium/hard quests that sometimes even grant you legendary items and face the main foe(s) of the map. Often times in this phase you will also conquer castles which in turn allow you to recruit a couple more units to finally max out your stack and, after you exterminated the big bad of the map, you finish up by completing the special quests which will open up the passage to the next map (many times the hardest quests of the map obviously involve exterminating the big bad, too).
But let me tell you about what you've been referring to, the combat!
Combat can be summed up by this simple 3 word formula: attack - defense = damage
Or in 3 other words: number crunching simulator
Or if are inclined to go even further here are 3 more words: banal, shit, boring
As you probably already saw from screenshots, the battlefields themselves are quite small. There are also no special fields like blocked terrain or "danger fields" like traps for instance. The movement system itself works like this: each melee unit can engage it's closest enemies, there are no movement points.
It doesn't matter if the closest enemy to friendly unit A is 1 tile away or 8 tiles away. Unit A can always move up to attack. BUT it can only move as far as the closest enemy unit.
So for instance let's say the enemy archer B is 2 tiles away from friendly unit A, A can move up and attack. BUT if enemy knight C is 1 tile away, suddenly our unit A can't move the 2 tiles to the enemy archer B any longer, because the enemy knight C is only 1 tile away thus the maximum movement range of our unit A becomes 1, because the closest enemy unit (the knight C) is 1 tile away.
On paper it sounds a little confusing, in-game though it becomes intuitive rather quickly.
But what does this mean in terms of tactical combat? Well one might say combat becomes less tactical because of this movement system and I tend to agree. Then again if you exchange the movement system with areas of control like from D&D for instance, the outcome is essentially the same because of the small size of the battle grid.
Ranged units, both projectile and magic based, can hit any unit, neither friendly nor enemy units can block the line of sight.
Initial positioning also has very little impact on the actual outcome once again thanks due to the small battle grid size, there is no real room for outmaneuvering especially in the mid- and late game of a map when the stacks of units reach their maximum sizes.
While there are some special abilities for units, they are mostly of the really simple and uninspired variety. For instance archers can forfeit their current turn in order to gain +x% damage the next one (to help overcome high defense units. Remember attack - defense = damage). Other units can forfeit their turn for +defense (minor tactical decision: forfeit turn for unit, so enemy melee unit can't reach it at all thanks to movement system).
If a unit gains enough experience through combat, you can advance them on the spot to a higher tier which means +stats and being able to equip better gear (a unit that could only wear light armor and swords now can equip medium armor and axes along swords for example). Most units can choose between two different paths. Basic ranged units for instance can become either Archers (high intiative, good against low defense units) or Crossbowmen (low initiative, good against high defense units).
I did mention conquering castles earlier during the 4X description and perhaps that got you all excited about siege battles. Well I'm afraid siege battles are just normal battles. The only difference is that units start with a little less HP (simulating the ranged units firing upon the each other I suppose).
Taking all of this into account, I'm afraid to say that the combat boils down to an almost pure number crunching simulator and as a result you find yourself working very methodically through the maps. Beating overpowered units only via superior tactical decisions becomes nigh on impossible.
Then again, this seems to be part of the overall design. This is a strategy game after all, not a tactical combat simulator. And luckily there's an auto resolve button which thus far came in very handy for me. The auto resolve outcomes aren't as good as if you were playing the battles manually but an abundance of resources (gold) to replenish your troops on most of the maps make it a very tempting alternative that I made good use of thus far.
Having said all of that, minor no-brainer tactical decisions during combat can be found here and there. For instance you can move your more advanced/higher armor units up to the front while ordering the lower tier/squishier units to wait until the end of a combat turn. So the enemy will waste some of their damage potential on the heavy unit and you move your squishy units in at the end of the round to maximize damage potential. Still these little really no-brainer decisions won't be able to satisfy even the most inexperienced armchair general.
Another factor for the number crunching which also affects battles in a major way are unit equipment choices.
During the adventure you will find plenty of gear to outfit both your avatar and your troops. There are plenty of different armors, weapons, trinkets etc. to be found. Sadly, there are very few "cool" and unique items. Even the legendary items you obtain via lengthy and sometimes hidden questlines are more often than not essentially just bigger numbers.
Weapons come in different types of categories like Spear, Axe, Sword etc. each with unique combat boni. For instance axes ignore part of the enemy defense, swords allow for a counter attack of attack X% etc.
2 handed weapons are available and you trade +attack for -defense (lack of shield), sometimes -initiative (unit acts later in a combat round)
Armors (light, medium, heavy) are essentially gradually higher defense numbers, minor downside can be a lower initiative. But same as for weapons the formula is bigger = better.
Trinkets, of which each unit can equip 4 different variations like rings or amulets, also give minor boni like for instance +5 health or +1 attack. *yay*
In terms of equipment, and almost anything else about this game, it is very rare to stumble across something truly special or unique. But there are exceptions from the rule. You will find the occasional interesting item like a magical sword... which will ignore % of enemy defense thanks to it's "magical" attribute. In of itself not particularly awe inspiring but true to the "realistic fantasy" setting, you will encounter the odd enemy that is immune to worldly damage and can only be hurt via magic damage like for instance a ghost. 97.357% of the enemies you'll encounter are of the mortal, worldly variety though. And so will be your own units by the way.
On a more positive note, even while the combat can indeed be considered lackluster thus far I did enjoy the overall atmosphere of the game, the quests as well as the map objectives are varied and while the main story line is a little heavy on the cliché and OMG TWIST side of things I'm still engaged. There's also choice to be found in some quests, not so much consequence though.
I also have to mention that I did enjoy the exploration of the maps tremendously especially in conjunction with the quests. While many quests do have quest markers, there are just as many quests where you have to figure out for yourself where to go or what to do. That is quite the refreshing experience. More of this please!
TL;DR: If you are looking for a true alternative to King's Bounty or HOMM I'm afraid you will be disappointed, but Legends of Eisenwald is fun in it's own right. Too bad the combat is lackluster, since you will be doing quite a lot of it I can understand how that could be off-putting. But there's always the auto resolve button and the exploration together with the quests make Legends of Eisenwald a worthwhile experience in my humble opinion.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2002
- Messages
- 17,068
Seriously, though...
Aterdux Entertainment
Where is my key? I backed the game for a digital copy. No e-mail or anything.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2012
- Messages
- 9,377
Yes, I've played the pirated version and I regret nothing.
Excidium II
Self-Ejected
I'm surprised anyone took the time to crack and put on torrents such a niche release (inb4 it was the devs themselves with added bugs to disencourage piracy)
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2012
- Messages
- 9,377
Aterdux Entertainment
Aterdux Entertainment
Zed, please go to https://www.humblebundle.com/store/keyresender and enter the email address you provided in the survey. We ask Humble folks on Friday to send out keys but they didn't do it yet. That's the only way we can do it, our apologies!
Last edited by a moderator:
Aterdux Entertainment
Aterdux Entertainment
Angelo85, copying my response from another thread:
Thanks for long read! So seldom these days. I disagree of course about combat but that's just me. Did you watch a battle I had in my combat video? The thing is the level of challenge depends on you and what armies you take on:
- Play "safe" and attack armies only weaker than you - means less healing, more gold and less exp
- Play "tough" and attack strong armies early on - means more healing, wounds and more exp.
The save to my combat video is still there and the thing is auto resovle looses that battle. But I could win it in the end.
Like in King's Bounty, attacking very weak armies won't give you enough tactical richness, same is here. So playing the "tough" way is my choice.
Thanks for long read! So seldom these days. I disagree of course about combat but that's just me. Did you watch a battle I had in my combat video? The thing is the level of challenge depends on you and what armies you take on:
- Play "safe" and attack armies only weaker than you - means less healing, more gold and less exp
- Play "tough" and attack strong armies early on - means more healing, wounds and more exp.
The save to my combat video is still there and the thing is auto resovle looses that battle. But I could win it in the end.
Like in King's Bounty, attacking very weak armies won't give you enough tactical richness, same is here. So playing the "tough" way is my choice.
Then fuck your problem.
Game is fun so far but with a few minor quirks; its button are often hard to click on leading to instance when you click the option you were not intended to and game is heavy at CPU... My Comp melted once even with 8 fans installed and good Cooler (Buts its middle of heat wave and I left game on for hours)... And Btw how to hurt the damn ghost on first Map? I almost rage quit this one (and no I am not playing pirate version). But its Great work Komrades for small studio from Best Russia owerall. 
Waiting here for patches will play more later. :russia:
Waiting here for patches will play more later. :russia:
Kz3r0
Arcane
- Joined
- May 28, 2008
- Messages
- 27,026
Except you were playing such boring game at lenght and only the bug stopped you, try harder.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2012
- Messages
- 9,377
At length? Let's not get over ourselves.
But yea, the bug and the realization that I am wasting my time on a game nowhere near intriguing as I thought with boring and frustrating combat mechanics.
If it were not for the bug, it could have been just as easily the need to take a piss or someone ringing at the door to stop me from continuing to play.
If I were to pirate some AAA game and tell about it, nobody would have cared.
But if I pirate a mediocre turn based game just to see what's all about from a studio the Codex has a fetish for, all the hypocrites start to come out from the woodwork riding high horses and fisting each other.
Aterdux Entertainment
Aterdux Entertainment
Zed, sorry for this stuff, it's either us fucked up or Humble. I will send you a key in a private conversation right now!
Main campaign is about 50 hours.
Clockwork Knight
Arcane
The dude's name appears to be glitched, I just see garbage characters.
LeStryfe79
President Spartacus
I finally checked my old kickstarters.....Wow, $35 got me the soundtrack and an extra key? Sweet!
Gord
Arcane
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2011
- Messages
- 7,049
Should have been fixed in the patch from friday night or such.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.