being different than what you like isnt valid criticism of witcher.
Still the best combat system in the series.half-decent game had a rhythm clicking combat. No amount of alchemy salvages that.
Poor Scorpia wrote during the so-called "Golden Age", which was a casual era: it's only the glorious Renaissance/API era that facilitates hardcore write-ups (Baldur's Gate, ToEE, Jagged Alliance 2). Go and check out 'Dex threads on the Goldbox games: nothing hardcore in sight. Just some oldfags talking about party composition. No stats, no breakdowns, no in-depth analysis of THAC0, AC and spell mechanics. Nothing! Because the games are primitive, full stop.
You can check out its contemporaries here. Note that Mask of the Betrayer is there. MotB is superior to PS:T.
I don’t think he cares about CnC and reactivity.Note that octavius criticized both Fallout and Jagged Alliance 2. He also only played them recently, and after he played Oblivion. Note that he has played neither ToEE nor Arcanum nor Vampire: The Masquerade Bloodlines; no Troika. But he has played Oblivion.
I don’t think he cares about CnC and reactivity.
Note that octavius criticized both Fallout and Jagged Alliance 2. He also only played them recently--after he played Oblivion. Note that he has played neither ToEE nor Arcanum nor Vampire: The Masquerade Bloodlines; no Troika. But he has played Oblivion.
Even Dragon Age: Origins is better than The Witcher.