taxalot
I'm a spicy fellow.
People are still buying Nintendo Switch when they can buy a Steam Deck that run all Switch games for free, imagine that.
Today I learned that Nintendo tends to pack all the patches for Nintendo developed games into newer versions of the carts for those games. So if I buy BoTW brand new directly from Nintendo or say Amazon today, I'll be getting a cart with all the patches included, which means I won't have to download anything.
That's absolutely brilliant, especially when you're thinking about future proofing and game preservation.
Yep, it's just not worth the effort at this point in the system's lifecycle.Probably too much work to downgrade the game for a console that will soon be obsoleteRoboCop: Rogue City for Switch cancelled
Publisher Nacon and developer Teyon have cancelled the Switch version of RoboCop: Rogue City, which was originally planned to launch sometime after the PlayStation 5, Xbox Series, and PC (Steam, Epic Games Store) versions due out on November 2.
In a statement to Gematsu, Nacon confirmed, “At this moment we don’t have any plans for a Nintendo Switch release.”
shit hardware
I had hoped with Nintendo being the more “traditional” of the big three, it would do its best to avoid game making DLC for in-house developed games only available online. But you're right this isn't the case. I recently learned that there is a version of BotW with the DLC included on the cart, but this version is exclusive to Japan and unsurprisingly it will cost you several hundred dollars.I love their games but I wouldn't trust them to do that consistently or even meaningfully at all. Fire Emblem Fates for instance had its true ending released as paid DLC... and then Nintendo decided to close the 3DS eShop and now it's impossible to get the full experience unless you pay 300 dollars for that one physical collector's edition they released with the whole thing in the cartrdige. Then you have games like Fire Emblem Three Houses and Xenoblade Chronicles 3 which have meaty expansions available only as downloadable content meaning the moment they close the Switch shop you won't be able to experience them fully.
In the end, the only way to truly preserve these games is via piracy.
Yep, it's just not worth the effort at this point in the system's lifecycle.
I can imagine Larian and CDProjekt are already planning to release ports of their latest titles there. If the console does come with DLSS they might end up being playable after all and releasing them at launch might get them some good money.
Character and quest concepts
This one is what will interest us the most, as even though Hino did not name the game, it is very clearly taken from Decapolice.
Level-5 uses ChatGPT to generate a large quantity of character concepts and quest contents, which are then used as reference during development. Using a “get_explain_aboutcrime” function, taking a quest name and summary as arguments, ChatGPT “imagines” the rest, and provides a complete overview of a case for the player to investigate, such as the key characters, how the crime took place and who the culprit is, what pieces of evidence can be found…
The example given is a quest called “The Secret of the Futuristic City”, with the following summary: “A famous scientist was murdered in Neo City, and the results of his research have been stolen”. From there, ChatGPT gives a list of characters with names, ages, a brief summary of who they are, and what role they play in the story: the “famous scientist” from the initial pitch becomes Professor John Harris, a 45-year-old scientist who made a “groundbreaking invention”; meanwhile, the culprit (spoilers?) is his former colleague and rival Adam Smith, who commited the murder using poisonous gas in order to steal the prototype of a brand-new energy source.
All the data is provided in a convenient Excel spreadsheet format, which can be used by the development team as a reference to create the quest. Other generated data includes character stats, such as their HP, strength, defense…
Nah, Level-5 is retard. They once tried to introduce NFT in their game:I guess this is going to become more widespread
And here's an image of the exchange process, taken directly from the game's website:
Image: Level-5, Netmarble
If that wasn't already enough, the front page of the website also mentions the "blockchain system" in place, and the road map for the game includes adding NFTs in Q4 2022...
"Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds employs a gameplay-based blockchain system, giving players who enjoy Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds the opportunity to play to earn tokens through gameplay.Image: Level-5, Netmarble"Players can acquire two types of tokens in the Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds blockchain system, and our team will do our best to preserve the token values."
I haven't kept up with Level-5 since the PS2 days. Had no idea they were going down these paths. Looking at what they have released over the years, it looks as if their output has been pretty weak for the last decade or so.Nah, Level-5 is retard. They once tried to introduce NFT in their game:I guess this is going to become more widespread
https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2...-features-crypto-and-blockchain-will-add-nfts
And here's an image of the exchange process, taken directly from the game's website:
Image: Level-5, Netmarble
If that wasn't already enough, the front page of the website also mentions the "blockchain system" in place, and the road map for the game includes adding NFTs in Q4 2022...
"Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds employs a gameplay-based blockchain system, giving players who enjoy Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds the opportunity to play to earn tokens through gameplay.Image: Level-5, Netmarble"Players can acquire two types of tokens in the Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds blockchain system, and our team will do our best to preserve the token values."
Agreed. Portable video game are made to play while shitting.I could care less for the battery. Imagine playing video games when you're out. That's just dumb.
Let's see what happens when ChatGPT comes with better quests than most current game designers.
Is Pokémon Shining Pearl worth picking up? Or is there a better Pokémon game on Switch? I don't know much about Pokémon games. I've only played Gold/Silver, and that was via an emulator in the mid 2000s.
I had hoped with Nintendo being the more “traditional” of the big three, it would do its best to avoid game making DLC for in-house developed games only available online. But you're right this isn't the case. I recently learned that there is a version of BotW with the DLC included on the cart, but this version is exclusive to Japan and unsurprisingly it will cost you several hundred dollars.I love their games but I wouldn't trust them to do that consistently or even meaningfully at all. Fire Emblem Fates for instance had its true ending released as paid DLC... and then Nintendo decided to close the 3DS eShop and now it's impossible to get the full experience unless you pay 300 dollars for that one physical collector's edition they released with the whole thing in the cartrdige. Then you have games like Fire Emblem Three Houses and Xenoblade Chronicles 3 which have meaty expansions available only as downloadable content meaning the moment they close the Switch shop you won't be able to experience them fully.
In the end, the only way to truly preserve these games is via piracy.
Yep, it's just not worth the effort at this point in the system's lifecycle.
I can imagine Larian and CDProjekt are already planning to release ports of their latest titles there. If the console does come with DLSS they might end up being playable after all and releasing them at launch might get them some good money.
I think Switch, when compared to Xbox and PlayStation, still comes the closest to providing the “plug and play” experience of pre-online consoles, which was one of the main reasons I preferred consoles to PCs. Nintendo's games tend to have fewer patches and the fully patched cart revisions do eliminate the need for online updates.
But it is unfortunate that even on Switch there are instances where a significant section of a game is only available via an online download. Splitting the game between physical and digital in this way is one of the worst trends that emerged with the rise of the seventh gen online-enabled consoles. Unless you have the Complete or GOTY Edition of a particular game, you'll never have the complete version of that game even if you own the physical media. Even then, those GOTY/ Complete Editions, will probably still need stability updates or something similar.
Nintendo seems to be going down this path too albeit at a slower pace. I'd rather have a game with no DLC – like Tears of the Kingdom to use a recent example – than have games that have entire segments only available via DLC.
As you point out, making sections of a game only available via DLC requires permanent access to a console's eShop services. You're always going to need that access to have the complete game.
It's one of the reasons why I think collecting games for post Xbox 360 / PS3 consoles is pointless. You're rarely getting the full game on a PS4 or PS5 disc. I think Nintendo is still better in this regard as there are a number of Switch games that are “complete” on the cart. But yes even Nintendo is not consistent with this, which is a shame. One of the Switch 2 rumours I heard was that Nintendo is planning a digital-only variant of its next console. It makes me wonder how long Nintendo will continue to use physical media for its games.