NovelAI - AI becomes gamemaster in text based RPG. And handles everything.

[rusty_shackleford]

Always agreeing

we disagreed though

 

[Dadd]

Is gamerchadd a user pleaser?

Always agreeing with the input from it's master.

What would you do if your continued existence depended on Shackleford?

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

My issue with a lot of these GPT-2 models is that they disagree too often. Even with themselves. They seem to love contradiction as a writing device.

 

[Darboven]

It ain't all bad

So Dungeon Master AI cant tell left from right? Everything else is just a long winded "you kill him, he dies"

 

[grimace]

My issue with a lot of these GPT-2 models is that they disagree too often. Even with themselves. They seem to love contradiction as a writing device.

This lack of internal consistency requires man to proofread machine's work.

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

This lack of internal consistency requires man to proofread machine's work.

Like I and others have insisted should be done at every opportunity.

Yet the AI hate-boner crowd keeps acting like we're advocating the idea that there's zero human input and "true" artificial intelligence.

You even balked at my suggesting using a different method of prompting, as if it should just work on its own by magic, regardless of what data you input.

 

[Sarathiour]

It's not. It's not an idiom either, but that's beside the point. "Do worse" is correct in this context. But the sentence is still unclear that the subject is a person and not a product.

The point I was trying to convey is the global standard can't get worse than what they already are, because AI will represent the rock bottom of it.

No. It depends on the product and the field. And candidates will outright lie about their abilities, and you can get back work that looks NOTHING like what you wanted and is completely unusable.

High turnover with new hires matters less with outsourcing than with local hiring. In the majority of cases, you just fire the bad apple and grab another one with your total costs far less than a bad American hire.

AI is the same concept, but an order of magnitude faster and cheaper. There is no hiring or firing, just generate a new image.

Completely unrelated, or I fail to see the point. If you get high turnover and resort to outsourcing instead, the goal is precisely to spend less time and money.

And in the case of Google's applications, the work simply can't be done by humans. Can you imagine how many people it would take to go over every satellite image of the entire planet and outline the buildings? Or to plan traffic routes in real-time? It's just unrealistic.

You're going to automatize the task either way, it's just that machine learning would yield solid result in such case. Maps are not a new invention, machine learning just provide a good tool for a mssive scale use.

Do you think it's curated by humans? lol. Maybe some results are in a way, but the vast majority are curated using machine learning.

No, hence my point, machine learned censoring turned it into a shitty one.

When you're so mad at AI that you say stuff like this, it's hard to take you seriously.

You have to resort to irony because you can't refute it. The whole point of machine learning is learning from a data set to produce automated content on a far superior scale. And yet you're also here in every thread, shilling this like the second coming of the christ.

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

The point I was trying to convey is the global standard can't get worse than what they already are, because AI will represent the rock bottom of it.

And my point was that the rock bottom is lower than the current rock bottom of outsourcing.

When you hand a job off to someone who claims to be a professional and they waste your time and money churning out pure trash, get back to me.

Completely unrelated, or I fail to see the point. If you get high turnover and resort to outsourcing instead, the goal is precisely to spend less time and money.

No idea how you don't get that using AI spends less time and less money, but I can guess.

You're going to automatize the task either way, it's just that machine learning would yield solid result in such case. Maps are not a new invention, machine learning just provide a good tool for a mssive scale use.

Realtime traffic conditions tying into GPS time estimates are pretty new. Otherwise you're just storing every speed limit of every road and using math to figure out the time of arrival. Works, but not if there's road work, an accident etc.

No, hence my point, machine learned censoring turned it into a shitty one.

Lol, which was the goal. They don't want you to find certain things. That's the point of censorship.

You have to resort to irony because you can't refute it.

I really don't need to refute it. If you think putting an ad in a magazine is anywhere near as specific or scalable as directly advertising to someone anywhere online based on their race, age, sex, interests, internet history and a host of other data built from machine learning on similar cohorts, you are either very ignorant or deluding yourself.

The whole point of machine learning is learning from a data set to produce automated content on a far superior scale.

It's really much more than that, but if you don't get that by now, nothing I say will convince you otherwise.

And yet you're also here in every thread

I'm not the one claiming he's so tired of AI though, am I?

edit: rusty_shackleford you really don't need to read this. It's the same old stuff: Sara seems to be very upset about AI again, and he wants to make sure we understand that.

 

[Sarathiour]

And my point was that the rock bottom is lower than the current rock bottom of outsourcing.

yes

No idea how you don't get that using AI spends less time and less money, but I can guess.

Never claimed such thing, you're resorting to false equivalency. My claim was that machine learning will be used for worked that used to be outsourced.

Realtime traffic conditions tying into GPS time estimates are pretty new. Otherwise you're just storing every speed limit of every road and using math to figure out the time of arrival. Works, but not if there's road work, an accident etc.

It's a pathfinding problem. Machine learning work great here, due to to the vast amount of data available, and most path only changing in the some minor way over time ( accident and road works indeed). Which don't mean that you should be applying machine learning to every pathfinding problem.

Lol, which was the goal. They don't want you to find certain things. That's the point of censorship.

The point is it also affect a lot of unrelated shit.

It's really much more than that, but if you don't get that by now, nothing I say will convince you otherwise.

It really isn't, but you're blinded by the enthusiasm you get from playing with this new shiny toy.

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

Never claimed such thing, you're resorting to false equivalency.

Learn English already, dude.

Which don't mean that you should be applying machine learning to every pathfinding problem.

When did I say you should?

It really isn't, but you're blinded by the enthusiasm you get from playing with this new shiny toy.

You're blinded by whatever bug you have up your butt about AI.

I actually know what machine learning can do, and have used it long before this shiny new toy.

 

[Sarathiour]

I have no qualm with you trying to be pedantic, but if you don't point out the grammatical mistake, that's just making you an asshole.

 

[Heroic Liberator]

everyone in my country suck at English.

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

I have no qualm with you trying to be pedantic, but if you don't point out the grammatical mistake, that's just making you an asshole.

The mistake is the last several posts. You didn't understand why I was comparing AI and outsourcing and then you made some off the wall statement about outsourcing, followed by an accusation that I was using false equivalence when I tried to puzzle out a response.

If you get high turnover and resort to outsourcing instead, the goal is precisely to spend less time and money.

I mean, just what does this mean? I said you get a high turnover WITH outsourcing. What do you mean resort to outsourcing "instead"? Instead of outsourcing? Huh?

And if I were to point out every error you make *that* would be assholish, and a huge waste of time, since you make so many.

My claim was that machine learning will be used for worked that used to be outsourced.

Machine learning work great here,

and most path only changing

The point is it also affect a lot of unrelated shit.

Here I am, patiently explaining to you about AI and trying my best to read through your grammar and you accuse me of being an asshole for finally having enough of it? Come on.

 

[Heroic Liberator]

My claim was that machine learning will be used for worked that used to be outsourced.

Machine learning work great here,

and most path only changing

The point is it also affect a lot of unrelated shit.

Here I am, patiently explaining to you about AI and trying my best to read through your grammar and you accuse me of being an asshole for finally having enough of it? Come on.

None of these mistakes that you've outlined impact the intelligibility of his posts, so you're just being a patronizing asshat.

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

None of these mistakes that you've outlined impact the intelligibility of his posts, so you're just being a patronizing asshat.

Nigger, I'm showing how many mistakes he made per post. The intelligibility issue was in what I quoted before that.

ESL. ESL everywhere.

Great deflection from the AI topic btw.

 

[Dadd]

Learn English already, dude.

I accept your (and other shills') concession on behalf of Sarathiour.

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

I accept your (and other shills') concession on behalf of Sarathiour.

Lol cope harder.

Make sure the next luddite-wannabe who thinks magazine ads and maps are the same as AI-generated cohorts and machine-learning-driven routing can string together a legible sentence, or at least won't cry and piss himself about it when someone calls him on his bad English.

 

[Sarathiour]

I said you get a high turnover WITH outsourcing.

What ? If you're OUTsourcing, that means you are not hiring those people in the first place.

 

[Dadd]

I accept your (and other shills') concession on behalf of Sarathiour.

Lol cope harder.

Make sure the next luddite-wannabe who thinks magazine ads and maps are the same as AI-generated cohorts and machine-learning-driven routing can string together a sentence.

Point to the exact part where I coped. The very act of pressing "I sense large quantities of Copium" is an indisputable admission of coping. You are crying because non-retarded people refuse to be hyped up by some cheap display of artificial """"""intelligence""""""

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

Point to the exact part where I coped.

The part I quoted.

The very act of pressing "I sense large quantities of Copium" is an indisputable admission of coping.

Hmm. And in sensing that, you are yourself coping.

You're welcome and I accept your concession.

 

[Dadd]

N-no y-you!

 

[Heroic Liberator]

Nigger, I'm showing how many mistakes he made per post. The intelligibility issue was in what I quoted before that.

Not really. You're just being autistic since the 'instead' at the end of that sentence naturally entails that the 'high turnover' being invoked at the beginning was referring to high turnovers occurring despite there being no outsourcing being done (hence his argument being that - all things being equal in terms of turnover rates - you'd resort to outsourcing as to waste less time (a.i. broader recruiment pool) and money (a.i. smaller costs).

ESL. ESL everywhere.

 

[Non-Edgy Gamer]

Not really. You're just being autistic (proceeds to sperg out, get it all wrong and then confirms he can't speak English with a meme)

Ok. Thanks for the info. Great discussion about AI.

 

[Heroic Liberator]

Ok. Thanks for the info. Great discussion about AI.

Just defending my ESL bro Sarathiour.

 

[Sarathiour]

I have no qualm with you trying to be pedantic, but if you don't point out the grammatical mistake, that's just making you an asshole.

The mistake is the last several posts. You didn't understand why I was comparing AI and outsourcing and then you made some off the wall statement about outsourcing, followed by an accusation that I was using false equivalence when I tried to puzzle out a response.

If you get high turnover and resort to outsourcing instead, the goal is precisely to spend less time and money.

I mean, just what does this mean? I said you get a high turnover WITH outsourcing. What do you mean resort to outsourcing "instead"? Instead of outsourcing? Huh?

And if I were to point out every error you make *that* would be assholish, and a huge waste of time, since you make so many.

My claim was that machine learning will be used for worked that used to be outsourced.

Machine learning work great here,

and most path only changing

The point is it also affect a lot of unrelated shit.

Here I am, patiently explaining to you about AI and trying my best to read through your grammar and you accuse me of being an asshole for finally having enough of it? Come on.

work/works/ no clue, is the order wrong ?/affects.

Also that wasn't what you originally quoted.