Diogo Ribeiro
Erudite
Patrick Stewart erosion and mounted crossbows with schedules.
Electronic Gaming Monthly said:Oblivion: What could possibly go wrong? Despite the fact that its developer guarantees that we'll see Oblivion on shelves alongside the 360 hardware on day one, a few nasty bugs are still infecting its mammoth fantasy. "There is a unicorn in the game, and the other day when I was playing I found it dead," explains Howard. "The Minotaur killed it; he's supposed to protect it, but his A.I. is just too aggro." If the game's inhabitants can't get along, is there any hope for players? Massive patches, bug-fixes, and even recalls happen surprisingly frequently in the realm of PC games, but nobody wants to bring home a busted, buggy, and potentially crash-ridden console game on launch day.
Role-Player said:Patrick Stewart erosion and mounted crossbows with schedules.
Tintin said:That's so clever. You should lead the world.
crpgnut said:I can't wait to find out about the story. Morrowind had a cluster-ahem for a story. As far as I know, Ken Rolston is still doing the story and I hope he gets a little in touch with reality this time. Nobody cared about being the Nevarine, nobody wanted to save the Dark Elves. I would have much rather have been the prophesied scourge of the Dark Elf race in Morrowind, than their saviour.
geminito said:In general, I find most suggestions made as ways to improve Morrowind would have only made the game worse. Most suggestions were about making it more "realistic". People don't always suggest things that would make a game more fun.
Examples:
- Poison should kill you.
- You must eat and sleep.
- You can get crippled limbs and lose limbs in combat.
Fun? NO!
Yeah, look at the kind of shitty combat and graphics you get with just one artist and one programmer.MrSmileyFaceDude said:Doing mounted combat right would have involved a significant amount of dedicated time from more than one programmer and more than one artist and a good chunk of time spent in QA.
Just without any crossbows.MrSmileyFaceDude said:And no, the game is not being rushed for anything. It'll be released when it's ready.
That's because all unicorns are natural born pacifists.DarkUnderlord said:Unicorns do rock though. I'm willing to bet you can't ride one though or fight mounted warriors.
That's not a sign of being a gamer, it's a sign of being an imbecile. And I don't care about the arguments why I supposedly can't expect someone to talk properly which are so en vogue.MrSmileyFaceDude said:And why can't we use "aggro." You know, most game developers got into the business because they're -- gasp -- gamers.
Exactly.Claw said:That's not a sign of being a gamer, it's a sign of being an imbecile.MrSmileyFaceDude said:And why can't we use "aggro." You know, most game developers got into the business because they're -- gasp -- gamers.
Role-Player said:I already sent an application to the proper authorities but they haven't responded yet. That's what I get for interacting with people who don't have Radiant AI.
Claw said:Sure, some gamers are also imbeciles. But not all imbeciles are gamers, and aggro isn't gamer lingo, it's idiot talk.
Yeah, look at the kind of shitty combat and graphics you get with just one artist and one programmer.DarkUnderlord said:MrSmileyFaceDude said:Doing mounted combat right would have involved a significant amount of dedicated time from more than one programmer and more than one artist and a good chunk of time spent in QA.
Redcoat-Mic said:Shitty combat and graphics? The combat is one of the best i've seen in a game! Graphics arn't that important as anyone who's played one of those horrible EA movie tie-in games, sure it's nice but not too important, plus their getting updated all the time after all the game is only at 0.632 beta stage. Games are about fun not how many people made it and what how a building you'll see once in a game is shaded. Mount and Blade also dosn't rob you £40 when you buy it.
After thorough consideration I can definitely state that there are 2 creatures on the second illustration provided. I have failed to find an obvious to me conclusion that would follow and support your point though. Are you suggesting that unicorns are dumber than Minotaur since there's a 50/50 chance they don't know how to straighten their hind legs? (as follows from the aforementioned pictorial proof) I'd like to know since I feel totally preoccupied with this brilliant argument and this seriously hinders my work performance.Chefe said:I never said having a unicorn is dumbing down, I simply said it was only a really dumb creature.
Surely, you must see that there's a difference between this:
I welcome and congratulate you with coming out of the closet and sharing your emotion. I look forward to get even deeper insight into your inner self, please do not stop - you can reach out much more now.Chefe said: